Jump to content

Rugby Is Terrible

Gold Members
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rugby Is Terrible

  1. Ah so the more draconian measures in South Africa were appropriate because they didn’t add even more draconian measures. Sound. A literal curfew for goodness sake.
  2. Interesting that the South Africans believed a curfew and massive restrictions on sporting events were still required during the Omicron wave.
  3. Oh. Must be a different South Africa the echo chamber boys were prattling on about.
  4. Actually having looked it up South Africa applied some pretty draconian restrictions, including a literal curfew. That can’t be the same South Africa that the Main Players were begging us to take the lead from?
  5. What restrictions, if any, did South Africa play on large sporting events during the ‘Omicron wave’? I know there was quite a lot of anger in certain corners that we completely ignored their advice on the severity of the strain and advice on restrictions that were or were not required to combat it.
  6. Wtf!? What’s sad is the hurt and humiliation his victim felt. The fact that we can’t sign a player because he raped someone is not a pity!!! I despair at our fans sometimes.
  7. Cummings minor discretion should end his Dundee career because he’s been bang average. Charlie Adam could’ve killed someone with his drink driving but he has to stay because he’s good at kicking a ball.
  8. What on earth was the point in polling the members if the result was going to be completely ignored!? How anyone can excuse the behaviour of the board and management is beyond me. The only reason we don’t have a rapist playing for him is because we couldn’t afford him. The intention was there. The fact that we couldn’t afford him just masks the complete lack of morals.
  9. Nope. I didn’t enjoy your posts so used the reputation function to display this. Believe that’s the purpose of the system? My major concern is Rennie has been here for a while now and is still persisting with McKay. That is bordering on inexcusable and really does call into question wether he really is the man to take us forward if he can’t see that he’s a complete liability. we’d probably be better playing with 10 men.
  10. Agree with this. Watched it with the wife and it really was very poor. I renjoyed the other adaptations of Cobens stuff but this was nowhere near the same quality. Poorly acted, average script, zero tension and a laughable finale.
  11. Hopefully that’s the case. I still think it’s an absolute disgrace that our management team are willing to pay money for an actual rapist because he might drag us to a play off spot in the third tier. Nope I signed up to express my anger. The more people who do that the better surely?
  12. Care for a £100 charity bet that we sign Goodwillie?
  13. There’s an obvious reason this stuff is being deliberately leaked by people who are against the signing….
  14. Someone I trust implicitly at the club has informed us that we have 100% put in a bid for Goodwillie which has been rejected. The person in question is against the signing but the overriding feeling is the board are unwilling to meddle in such decisions.
  15. I don’t quite understand this logic though? If we’ve already made a bid to sign a literal rapist then the moral compass is already smashed into a million pieces. It says our management team and board are happy to pay cash money for a rapist because he’ll score goals and the only reason we won’t have a rapist playing for us is because Clyde are unwilling to sell. That’s completely unacceptable to me. With regards to fans demanding the board release a statement to distance themselves from the rumours, there’s an obvious reason why they haven’t done that…
×
×
  • Create New...