Fife Saint Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 If you are wondering, I have actually been set on fire before... Wondering? I've just bought a gallon of unleaded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Wondering? I've just bought a gallon of unleaded. Now, now, I don't believe for a minute you did that.... ...especially when you could have drained some red diesel from your tractor.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swampy Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Why are you adding arms and legs to the story? My dad pulled the cord because he happened to pass it first. I spoke to the driver because I happened to be closest to the intercom when he asked what had happened. Were the pair of you stacked inside a trenchcoat at the time? Why did he pull and you talk? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thommohawk Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I wouldn't say the morals of most on this thread differ.Just some find it easier to abstract the situation, that doesn't make them immoral. Right, this is the last time I reply to you cos we are getting bloody nowhere lol. Definition of immoral: 1. Of or concerned with the judgment of the goodness or badness of human action and character: moral scrutiny; a moral quandary.2. Teaching or exhibiting goodness or correctness of character and behavior: a moral lesson.3. Conforming to standards of what is right or just in behavior; virtuous: a moral life.4. Arising from conscience or the sense of right and wrong: a moral obligation. Boy sets someone on fire = bad. You find it funny = you approve, therefore you don't think it's bad ( or you know it's bad and you don't care). Boy in hospital with severe burns = Consequences of said bad (immoral) action that you approved of. Laughing at one boy setting another boy on fire resulting in severe burns = immoral. So you failed at: You had bad judgement on the badness or goodness of human action. You exhibited badness by laughing at the arsonists actions. You never conformed to standards of what is right or just behaviour You have no conscience of right and wrong cos you still think the poor c**t in hospital can be separated from the actual event. Go on, say you agree with me so I don't bite again and post lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thommohawk Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Wondering? I've just bought a gallon of unleaded. haha. Yeah, it's just what I;ve been thinking throughout this thread: "I wonder how many people have been set on fire". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Well, basically you were saying that everything was funny as f**k cos the guy is okay. If by "saying" you mean "weren't saying" then yeah, you're right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Were the pair of you stacked inside a trenchcoat at the time? Why did he pull and you talk? Thanks for proving my point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thommohawk Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 If by "saying" you mean "weren't saying" then yeah, you're right. If by "saying" I meant "saying" then I'd be right. I'm getting fed-up quoting you: Had the guy suffered serious injury then it wouldn't be funny, but people commenting on here know that it turned out alright. Unless you are implying that skin falling off and serious injuries is alright. IN THAT CASE, then we are both correct as we think certain injuries merit different grades of seriousness. In the case of serious injuries being serious injuries, then I believe I'd be correct. FAIL Now f**k off thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seamus Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 This event looks like some people's own 9/11 Next we will be getting a movie about it and conspiracy theories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 This event looks like some people's own 9/11 Next we will be getting a movie about it and conspiracy theories. You're helping to prove it as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seamus Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 You're helping to prove it as well Sorry I was not there,man. But if we all had to post pish about how being somwhere had affected us it would lead to a forum where self important cnuts who appear to lack any real life experience would act like attention seeking martyrs. I feel your pain etc.... Fuxake I hope you don't buy something out the chippy that's cold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Sorry I was not there,man. But if we all had to post pish about how being somwhere had affected us it would lead to a forum where self important cnuts who appear to lack any real life experience would act like attention seeking martyrs. I feel your pain etc.... Fuxake I hope you don't buy something out the chippy that's cold What's your fucking problem? I posted about my experience. That was jumped on and its escalated from there. You and at least two others are just fucking pathetic. You attack or criticise something that someone says, then have a go at them for banging on about it when they try and defend themselves. You all strike me as the kind of people who would beat the shit out of a kid or OAP to steal a penny and then tell them to stop whining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seamus Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 What's your fucking problem?I posted about my experience. That was jumped on and its escalated from there. You and at least two others are just fucking pathetic. You attack or criticise something that someone says, then have a go at them for banging on about it when they try and defend themselves. You all strike me as the kind of people who would beat the shit out of a kid or OAP to steal a penny. You judged others for having a laugh about a story and tried to perpetuate yourself as some kind of absolute authority on this massive event.Its only massive as you were there man. Seriously shit happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swampy Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 You all strike me as the kind of people who would beat the shit out of a kid or OAP to steal a penny and then tell them to stop whining. Did you bravely witness that, too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 If by "saying" I meant "saying" then I'd be right. I'm getting fed-up quoting you:Had the guy suffered serious injury then it wouldn't be funny, but people commenting on here know that it turned out alright. Unless you are implying that skin falling off and serious injuries is alright. IN THAT CASE, then we are both correct as we think certain injuries merit different grades of seriousness. In the case of serious injuries being serious injuries, then I believe I'd be correct. FAIL Now f**k off thanks. For the last time: I don't think it's "funny as f**k" that the guy got injured. I think the image that the BBC story conjured up was funny. If this is the level of posting that we'll get from Dundee fans, I'd rather Queen of the South were promoted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 You judged others for having a laugh about a story As have others, but I don't see you having a go at them. and tried to perpetuate yourself as some kind of absolute authority on this massive event.Its only massive as you were there man. Well, no I haven't. But evidently thinking that makes you feel happy. Which is a bit weird, to be honest, but never mind. Did you bravely witness that, too? I'm not indulging you any further. Find something else to w**k over other than my telling you to f**k off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Boy sets someone on fire = bad. You find it funny = you approve, therefore you don't think it's bad ( or you know it's bad and you don't care). Boy in hospital with severe burns = Consequences of said bad (immoral) action that you approved of. Laughing at one boy setting another boy on fire resulting in severe burns = immoral. So you failed at: You had bad judgement on the badness or goodness of human action. You exhibited badness by laughing at the arsonists actions. You never conformed to standards of what is right or just behaviour You have no conscience of right and wrong cos you still think the poor c**t in hospital can be separated from the actual event. Go on, say you agree with me so I don't bite again and post lol. That's some of the biggest load of pish posted here - and EastFootball has had a damned good crack at posting mince so that's saying something. You alone cannot decide what is moralistic, unless you are assuming everyone applies specifically to your personal moral compass, and what has conscience have to do with anything? And how can I have "no conscience of" it just doesn't make sense. Nobody is laughing at the lad. Just because you are incapable of finding humour in abstracted situations doesn't mean the rest of us can't, and it's nothing more than arrogance to assume that we are crossing some sort of moral divide when we do. Now you can keep on "biting" all you wish, but it's not my intention to keep casting you bait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seamus Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 As have others, but I don't see you having a go at them.Well, no I haven't. But evidently thinking that makes you feel happy. Which is a bit weird, to be honest, but never mind. It was your I was there quote that got me. If this situation has seriously affected you which it appears to have. Where there's blame... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 Did you bravely witness that, too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 It was your I was there quote that got me. I believe that quote was in response to either someone laughing about the situation, or someone claiming it wasn't that big a deal (or similar). If this situation has seriously affected you which it appears to have.Where there's blame... It hasn't seriously affected me. I'd have no doubt already forgotten about it had it not been for people seemingly extracting some sort of perverted pleasure from trivialising things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.