flyingrodent Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Philip or greensnake probably wrote it and went too far. Jesus Christ. So now the National Union of Journalists is controlled by deranged Rangers-haters as well, and their public statements are motivated by Rangers-hatred. Who else is part of this multi-tentacled conspiracy to make Rangers look bad? You don't usually hear this nonsense from people who don't also believe that the UN is plotting a military coup and that the Queen is a space-lizard. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 It comes to a choice between believing either an award-winning (OK, it's a small pond) journalist who says something happened but has no material proof or corroboration. A journalist who Rangers' fans say has an anti-Rangers agenda but who might just be a journalist who reports the facts. A journalist who was prepared to stand behind his statement even at the cost of his job. Or the board of RIFC, one of whom has been labelled a GASL by a South African judge. I note that the Herald says Rangers threatened legal action but Rangers haven't publicly refuted Spiers' claim: they've just gone on the offensive. ave they asked the crowd not sing offensive songs recently? Maybe a wee item in small type at the back of the programme? it comes down to either believing a liar who has made up stuff in the past about rangers and has no proof to back up his latest claim and who also refuses to name the rangers director involved or rangers who claim it didnt happen. it is up to speirs to prove it, he cant 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 the club/company thing is really easy to understand, how can you still be having trouble with it? Aye, they're the same thing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Jesus Christ. So now the National Union of Journalists is controlled by deranged Rangers-haters as well, and their public statements are motivated by Rangers-hatred. Who else is part of this multi-tentacled conspiracy to make Rangers look bad? You don't usually hear this nonsense from people who don't also believe that the UN is plotting a military coup and that the Queen is a space-lizard. glad you can admit that ill phil and greenslade are deranged rangers haters 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Aye, they're the same thing. not according to all the evidence , but you crack on with your delusions 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 I couldn't help but notice The_Arsehole and TEDI haven't been seen since MrX reminded them about his last warning? Hope they haven't been kicked off this thread that would be a right shame Just me, FB and rob left then. You really do have to believe a remarkable amount of absolute shyte, to be a Rangers fan these days. So, reporters file stories just to harm one particular club and deliberately get themselves fired from hugely profitable jobs, for no other reason than to suck up to fans of another club. Can you think of any other situation in life where this kind of thing would happen? No, you can't. Because it's ridiculous drivel. I never said that he " deliberately got himself sacked", maybe you should calm doon a bit and stop with the ott nonsense. Rangers never got them sacked. Rangers fans never got them sacked. They managed that all by themselves, which makes it all the more funnier. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 it comes down to either believing a liar who has made up stuff in the past about rangers and has no proof to back up his latest claim and who also refuses to name the rangers director involved or rangers who claim it didnt happen. it is up to speirs to prove it, he cant There are loads of situations where it comes down to one person's word against another - not enough evidence to satisfy a court but everyone 'knows he did it'. On the balance of probabilities, given the personalities involved... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 according to all the evidence , but I'll crack on with my delusions 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 I shocked to see Nacho suddenly appear since TEDI seems to have disappeared. Appears quite brazen! I hope MrX isnt looking in. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Jesus Christ. So now the National Union of Journalists is controlled by deranged Rangers-haters as well, and their public statements are motivated by Rangers-hatred. . Philip is secretary of the nuj, quite influential I believe but you already knew that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 That list of explanations for what happened between Spiers and a Rangers director, in full: - A professional journalist deliberately invented a story that might show Rangers in a bad light, purely motivated by malice and a desire to damage Rangers; He then intentionally orchestrated his own dismissal from a well-paid and cushy job, in order to show Rangers in a bad light and to win approval from Celtic fans; and now, the National Union of Journalists has backed the journalist, because the National Union of Journalists also hates Rangers and wants to show them in a bad light, or - A Rangers director told Spiers that he quite likes the Billy Boys song. Only a buffoon would believe that the former is more likely than the latter, regardless of which team they support. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Nederlander Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 the club/company thing is really easy to understand, how can you still be having trouble with it? The only member club to vote in favour of giving Rangers SPL membership was Rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Just me, FB and rob left then. I never said that he " deliberately got himself sacked", maybe you should calm doon a bit and stop with the ott nonsense. Rangers never got them sacked. Rangers fans never got them sacked. They managed that all by themselves, which makes it all the more funnier. Mods getting their banhammer out on anyone with team- rangers Rest can do and spout as much shite as they please 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 "A well paid job" Maybe rodent can tell us what spiers was getting paid, since he is in the know 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Mods getting their banhammer out on anyone with team- rangers Rest can do and spout as much shite as they please A forum this size and only 3 bears who post regularly on it, shocking stuff. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 That list of explanations for what happened between Spiers and a Rangers director, in full: - A professional journalist deliberately invented a story that might show Rangers in a bad light, purely motivated by malice and a desire to damage Rangers; He then intentionally orchestrated his own dismissal from a well-paid and cushy job, in order to show Rangers in a bad light and to win approval from Celtic fans; and now, the National Union of Journalists has backed the journalist, because the National Union of Journalists also hates Rangers and wants to show them in a bad light, or - A Rangers director told Spiers that he quite likes the Billy Boys song. Only a buffoon would believe that the former is more likely than the latter, regardless of which team they support. So if a journalist came out tomorrow and said lawell was told him he didn't mind roll of honour or roaming in the gloaming , in just a conversation . You would not want celtic to question it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 the club/company thing is really easy to understand, how can you still be having trouble with it? Because they're utterly synonymous in a football context. If they really are completely separate things, how do you define 'club'? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Nederlander Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 how do you define 'club'? IT'S THE FUCKING GOOD BITS FFS !! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Ironic TEDI n Kinky celebrating 2 people being sacked for being obsessed haters last night... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 So if a journalist came out tomorrow and said lawell was told him he didn't mind roll of honour or roaming in the gloaming , in just a conversation . You would not want celtic to question it? Do you think the default position should be to question anything unfavourable, or does the truth of a situation have a bearing? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.