wunfellaff Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 If he can't put forward a sustainable business model to progress through the lower echelons of Scottish football, with 50k punters desperate to buy in, then something is drastically wrong. Exactly, for who would want out now what with all the untold off the radar wealth about to pour in? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenolly Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 If he can demonstrate that he is leaving behind a sustainable business model, then he can go, in fact he has already confirmed this is exactly what he will do, he gets 10% of the company on completion of a successful share issue, at which point he wants voted out You mean like the one he has just now spending £6 million a year in basic wages in the 3rd division 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beermonkey Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 It is on Pauls blog page, no offence but anything written on that blog or the Scotlands Rangers Football Monitor will have the same logic applied to it, they are simply tic wet dreams Does the 3 or 4 times have some relevance? could it have been a slip of the tongue? FFS Tedi(ous)..Have a day off mate, seriously. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 The other board members And voting rights is one of the questions he has dodged / not answered, this for me is a key question, not vote = no shares the board members that he was told to put in place, hardly democratic. I am certain it was posted a while back about the AIM, and one of the 'advantages' was you could dodge the voting rights if that is your want. If indeed there is a prospectus, which he is under no obligation to provide, it will be interesting. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p&b is a disgrace Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 You are believing what Paul says or you have some other evidence? look at the comments and tell me if you see agreement, I dont He is on record as saying that this share deal will have FSA approval, national TV, if he has lied it will come out and he will be fucked http://www.londonstockexchange.com/companies-and-advisors/aim/publications/documents/a-guide-to-aim.pdf Check out page 6 which clarifies that there is no pre-vetting by the UKLA ( ie the FSA ) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 Yeah i think a 6 mill wage bill from a club getting 50k supporters through the turnstyles should be just fine, still the figures to prove it would be good for numerous reasons 50k paying customers would be better. He has already got the cash out of whatever the ST total is and the freebies handed out on match day don't count. It is the day to day cash he is needing to find and as he has already fleeced the ST punters he needs more...much like a vampire he needs to drink cash again..........soooooon. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenolly Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 If he can't put forward a sustainable business model to progress through the lower echelons of Scottish football, with 50k punters desperate to buy in, then something is drastically wrong. He's hardly started well, paying top SPL wages (More than Hearts Hibs & Aberdeen etc) whilst having his gate money halved due to lower admission prices, no TV money, no europe money, and no league sponsership & prize money. The business model is very transparent, pay his bosses off (Ticketus) with the share money and disappear when duff & phelps turn up again around xmas time 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbungo1874 Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 It is on Pauls blog page, no offence but anything written on that blog or the Scotlands Rangers Football Monitor will have the same logic applied to it, they are simply tic wet dreams If it was my club I would read it and then I would debunk what is written if it was untrue. However to say something is without merit because of where it is posted having not read it makes you look like a bit of an ignorant pie to be honest. When the News of the World ran Phill what's his name story about Rangers £24 Miilion EBT tax bill did you dismiss it as a tic wet dream thus leaving your self blissfully unaware of the facts? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnforever1992 Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 Tedi Fivestars ... under the illusion he has a say in whether Green can cash in and go or not. Under the illusion that the thick as mince bears will see through the smoke and mirrors. Under the illusion that Green will leave them room to mount a legal challenge once he fleeces them. Green will go once he fleeces you and on his own terms ..... Tedi's very own glue sniffing induced wonderland ... you tell him Tedi .... Tedi "Chuckie Cheese are you going to take us to European Super League aye?" Chuckie cheese "Yes we are going to Europe cause we are ra peepul!" Tedi "We are ra Peepul!" Craig Whyte "Alright Charlie ready to go pal?" Chuckie cheese "Yes my job is done here ticketus are happy and liquidate these b*****ds!" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p&b is a disgrace Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 Can he ask for FSA approval? I cannot find anything in that document that says the FSA will not vet the prospectus if requested Oh for f**k sake! Surely you know enough about the man to know that he will sail as close to the edge of legality as he can. He will NEVER ask for or volunteer for additional governance to imposed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fife Saint Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 f**k THE FSA, f**k THE FSA, f**k THE FSAAAA. f**k THE FSA.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 Tic fantasist forum for this pish A tick is a bloodsucker , so Green is very welcome I would suppose..... I know future Sports Personality of the Year. Craig Whyte, is 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 I can just envision Charlie striding along a country lane, followed by Tedi, Bendarroch, Bennett and the rest of the Orcs. They spy something in a field beside the road. Bennett calls to their saviour: "Charlie, Charlie, there's a load of dead clowns in that field!" "Never mind them, young fella," Charlie reassures him. "It's not far to the Circus now!" They carry on down the road a few more miles, and then they start to cross a bridge. Bendarroch looks over the parapet, and calls out: "Mr Green, Mr Green! there's a dozen horses drowned, floating down the river!" "Don't you worry your empty little head, sonny," says Charlie. "Nearly there now." Again they set off, and then Tedi pipes up: "Mr Green! Sir Charles! Look! There's two dead elephants lying next to the road!" "Oh, Tedi, you do worry too much. Come on, my followers, the Circus is just round the corner" And on they go, round the corner. Parked in a field, they see a helicopter. Confused, the Orcs look to Charlie - what can this mean? Charlie goes up to the helicopter, climbs in, and closes the door. "Bye, loyal supporters. I'm off to Monaco with Craigie now. They say there's a fine Circus there. Oh, but Tedi, why so glum? Bendarroch, is that a tear in your eye? I'm sorry, what was that? YOU want to go to the Circus? I don't remember telling you you could go. You followed me because you believed I would deliver shows and spectaculars. But then, it's not the first time that's happened, is it?" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelegendthatis Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 (edited) Can he ask for FSA approval? I cannot find anything in that document that says the FSA will not vet the prospectus if requested Unfortunately I am falling into the trap of responding to Tedi's pathetic, irrelevant and deliberately distracting tirades. Taking FSA approval as something significant is like saying being approved by Sir David Murray is important. He is typically Rangers in all their pomp, willing to discuss whether Ticketus got their money or not. Your time might be better spent talking about all the small companies who were ripped off by Murray and his entourage first and then Whyte supported by the guys who had lost their tongues. (Where is the legend that was John Grirg, as well as Martin Bain, Ken Olverman et all) Ticketus attracts money from people who are looking for a good return. http://www.octopusin...html?newsId=363 And of course investments can go down as well as up. If Octopus and Ticketus are quiet, you can be sure they have their money. End of. Whether McConville is a good guy or not is not relevant. The judgement should be on what he says. Despite your postings I won't tar you as a typical Rangers/Sevco protestant bigot, thug, lout, mason, orangeman. I will judge you on what you say. So let's forget the labels. Can give you the Latin term, but that doesn't make me a Tim, or whatever other label you want to use against anyone who is not 'one of us'. Edited October 21, 2012 by thelegendthatis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomogganners Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 http://www.londonsto...uide-to-aim.pdf Check out page 6 which clarifies that there is no pre-vetting by the UKLA ( ie the FSA ) http://www.londonstockexchange.com/companies-and-advisors/aim/advisers/aim-reg-team/aim-regulation-team.htm ...................not the FSA. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinnesTON Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 corrected Bears have been dismissing theories about their club finances as wet dreams since around 2004 .. if they only had listened and taken stock of the mess they were in then .. it could have been avoided .. It's cretins like Tedi that are responsible for their club's demise ... They spread the myth everything was fine .. nothing to see .. that allowed Murray the freedom to destroy the club ... Yet they still persist with the same attitude ..... Fcuking great !!!! Edit: You can just tell by Tedis responses he is so desperately trying to be like his hero Bennett ... Given that others have pointed out the financial plight oldco were in for many years before their demise makes you wonder when or if they will ever catch up. It's easy to deny this stuff but when some of it has came home to roost beyond many expectations of doom. How many would have predicted Liquidation ? So can anyone say for sure that there will not be further financial disasters to come given the constant links to unsavoury practices. I realize that the Sevconians have little choice, continued victims of Murray and Whyte and all the other muted directors. Given Green wants a return if you don't back this resurrection it may just force Chucky to reclaim his money by a giant fire sale. I haven't seen any Sevcoian actually rip the pish out of the Euro Super League stuff or the projections from media and capturing the Chinese market. Surely you guys are not taken in by this and nor will any investor but I doubt they expect any outside investors I think they are going for a big fan subscription. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelegendthatis Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 Shame this guy mixed up his J's with his T's. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kincardine Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 Despite your postings I won't tar you as a typical Rangers/Sevco protestant bigot, thug, lout, mason, orangeman. I will judge you on what you say. That is about 'the most shitest' post I have read on here. This is a forum and we all have respond to people as we find them. You have failed to do that. Read through the posts on this forum and then tell me who is the, " Bigot, thug, lout,". Apart from the odd alias and the occasional Wee Fanny most Bear here are certainly not louts or bigots. Shame on you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 At least he said "lout", not "loot". I mean, credit where it's due. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelegendthatis Posted October 21, 2012 Share Posted October 21, 2012 That is about 'the most shitest' post I have read on here. This is a forum and we all have respond to people as we find them. You have failed to do that. Read through the posts on this forum and then tell me who is the, " Bigot, thug, lout,". as a Sevco/Rangers apologist, which of the above do you plead not guilty to? Or is not proven still an option? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.