SS-18 ICBM Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 I see you deleted your last post re;Torbett and Masons. Just as well. Tell me,which Lodge was Torbett in because i've looked and can't find his name. eh?! have you been sniffing evo-stick again youngsy? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelegendthatis Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 So because a plc did not pay a bill to SAS you're wishing ill health and possible death to people who had nothing to do with the non-payment of a debt. You're a fucking tosspot. What is the comment about a kettle calling a tosspot black? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 eh?! have you been sniffing evo-stick again youngsy? Ha-Ha,i don't fucking think so,i was going to log in to answer it but you deleted it,as you well know. So let's leave it at that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelegendthatis Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 (edited) Lord Hodge said: "There may be a good answer to these allegations, but allegations are being ventilated which call into question the probity of proceedings." Meanwhile, the means of agreeing their (Duff & Duffer) £3.1m bill for fees and expenses has been questioned by Lord Hodge. The process of winding up administration is being further complicated by legal action in English courts against Collyer Bristow by Duff and Phelps and by others. The case continues into Wednesday afternoon. Wednesday afternoon could be a great start to November, which could be a brilliant month. (From the BBC web site. ) Edited October 31, 2012 by thelegendthatis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-18 ICBM Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Ha-Ha,i don't fucking think so,i was going to log in to answer it but you deleted it,as you well know. So let's leave it at that. I still haven't an Effin clue what you are on about. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 What is the comment about a kettle calling a tosspot black? You'll need to remind me when i wished ill health on anyone,if that's your inference 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 I still haven't an Effin clue what you are on about. Of course you haven't. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Paul the lawyer, the huddleboard, KDS, Celticminded.com as well as a few other internet green and greys are all at the COS today. Seriously what the f**k is wrong with you people? It was a straight choice between going to darkhead last night or to a court case on the Rangers today. No contest - Rangers every time. But - and don't forget this - they are not obsessed by every aspect and minute detail of our greatest of clubs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-18 ICBM Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 You'll need to remind me when i wished ill health on anyone,if that's your inference Whether you personally do or don't is irrelevant, you are an orc and you do not condemn those orc chums of yours who do. Enough said. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Sannox Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 It was a straight choice between going to darkhead last night or to a court case on the Rangers today. No contest - Rangers every time. But - and don't forget this - they are not obsessed by every aspect and minute detail of our greatest of clubs. As I said, it's all getting a bit silly on here. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Whether you personally do or don't is irrelevant, you are an orc and you do not condemn those orc chums of yours who do. Enough said. We can safely assume you fall directly into the number who did not condemn the east fife fuckwit who wants people dead because of an unpaid bill? Which would make you a total c**t. No one is surprised. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Whether you personally do or don't is irrelevant, you are an orc and you do not condemn those orc chums of yours who do. Enough said. I think it's you that's been sniffing Evo-Stick. What the fucking hell are you on about,i'll condemn anyone that wishes ill health on another person,whatever football team they support. Enough said. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 (edited) So because a plc did not pay a bill to SAS you're wishing ill health and possible death to people who had nothing to do with the non-payment of a debt. You're a fucking tosspot. Let's pause and have a think about whether "A plc did not pay a bill" is an accurate description of what actually happened. Is it? That description doesn't include the words "intentionally", "contracted services" or "in the full knowledge that the club would never be able to pay for them". Amazingly, it doesn't even contain the words "Rangers FC". "A plc"? How is it possible to describe how Rangers FC intentionally contracted services from the Scottish Ambulance Service in the full knowledge that the club would never be able to pay for them, without using these or similar phrases? It's harder, not easier, to describe that scenario in neutral, mistakes-were-made language. Clay's comment is childish and distasteful, but let's keep our boiling outrage in perspective here, eh? I don't like that kind of chat, but we are talking about the actions of "A plc" that may or may not have failed to deliver a sum of money owing to the Treasury, whether accidentally or by design. Edited October 31, 2012 by flyingrodent 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Capsule Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Lord Hodge said: "There may be a good answer to these allegations, but allegations are being ventilated which call into question the probity of proceedings." Meanwhile, the means of agreeing their (Duff & Duffer) £3.1m bill for fees and expenses has been questioned by Lord Hodge. The process of winding up administration is being further complicated by legal action in English courts against Collyer Bristow by Duff and Phelps and by others. The case continues into Wednesday afternoon. Wednesday afternoon could be a great start to November, which could be a brilliant month. (From the BBC web site. ) This is not going as well as we had envisaged. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 (edited) Let's pause and have a think about whether "A plc did not pay a bill" is an accurate description of what actually happened. Is it? That description doesn't include the words "intentionally", "contracted services" or "in the full knowledge that the club would never be able to pay for them". Amazingly, it doesn't even contain the words "Rangers FC". "A plc"? How is it possible to describe how Rangers FC intentionally contracted services from the Scottish Ambulance Service in the full knowledge that the club would never be able to pay for them, without using these or similar phrases? It's harder, not easier, to describe that scenario in neutral, mistakes-were-made language. Clay's comment is childish and distasteful, but let's keep our boiling outrage in perspective here, eh? I don't like that kind of chat, but we are talking about the actions of "A plc" that may or may not have failed to deliver a sum of money owing to the Treasury, whether accidentally or by design. Plc done all the big bad things Rangers FC done nothing wrong. It really is that easy for them to shift the blame, the "club" has nothing to do with the company. Edited October 31, 2012 by Enrico Annoni 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Plc done all the big bad things Rangers FC done nothing wrong. Ok then, let's give the full title;The Rangers Football Club PLC. Happy now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnforever1992 Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Plc done all the big bad things Rangers FC done nothing wrong. It really is that easy for them to shift the blame, the "club" has nothing to do with the company. Yes we are a new company we're not attached to the company, so are you saying youngsy that shyster Green can remove the company from the club and steal all the orcs dosh and run for it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotbawmad Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Has BDO taken over yet? Its a near certainty that sparks willing be flying over the new year period. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Has BDO taken over yet? Its a near certainty that sparks willing be flying over the new year period. It's old news. Bhairnforever reported BDO shut Rangers forever in mid-September. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Ok then, let's give the full title;The Rangers Football Club PLC. Happy now. I just find it amazing how Rangers fans can easily pass all responsibility onto the "company" to make it sound as if the "club" have nothing to do with it. it's just a cop out. Murray & Whyte, owned Rangers FC 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.