youngsy Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 No, you're getting this, the clubs boycott's because the game is deemed a safety risk. The fans boycott is because the united website called them The Rangers. Had to laugh at that. After all The Rangers is and has always been the correct name of the club from 1872. Perhaps it's just because we don't want to give them our money. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnforever1992 Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Warning: We are aware that criminals are currently using Hargreave Hale's name in an attempt to con unsuspecting victims in a share scam. http://www.hargreave-hale.co.uk/ ............................................made me laugh This? Warning: We are aware that criminals are currently using Hargreave Hale's name in an attempt to con unsuspecting victims in a share scam. To date this has been done by both telephone and in writing. Should you receive any unexpected correspondence or telephone calls claiming to be from Hargreave Hale we suggest that you contact Hargreave Hale directly to confirm if such correspondence is genuine. Haha fucking quality. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 1354841270[/url]' post='6871915']Quote from the BBC Tedi It would appear that the money will be sent to the charity foundation ! who runs that and is it a separate entity from the club itself ?. It was discussed on here ages ago, they aimed to raise 100k for the appeal. http://www.rangerscharity.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=466&Itemid=71 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Quote from the BBC Tedi It would appear that the money will be sent to the charity foundation ! who runs that and is it a separate entity from the club itself ?. The Rangers Charity Foundation is a separate entity from the club,although it is very well supported by the club and support. The money the club receive will be donated to The Prince and Princess of Wales Brick by Brick Appeal and Erskine charities via the Rangers Charity Foundation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Any chance you could answer my questions instead of ignoring them. Why did you put that forward as a quotation when it had nothing to do with the SFA statement? Point out in the SFA statement where it differentiates on continuity? f**k sake. Any chance you could give me more than 8 minutes between askin the question and then claiming im ignoring you. Total fuckin meltdown!!!! You posted a link to an old bbc story. This link differentiates between the old and new clubs. I never mentiones sfa statement. All in your head mate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Ask Burma,he brought up about differentiation over the membership transfer,i've asked him where in the SFA statement it determines any differentiation on club continuity. As in where it signifies that this is relating to different clubs. That's all that's asked for,nothing else. I never once mentioned an sfa statement. Your losing it mate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 f**k sake. Any chance you could give me more than 8 minutes between askin the question and then claiming im ignoring you. Total fuckin meltdown!!!! You posted a link to an old bbc story. This link differentiates between the old and new clubs. I never mentiones sfa statement. All in your head mate. What i've posted is the link confirming the Full SFA membership transer.What you put forward as a quote was in fact nothing to do with the transfer and indeed wasn't a quote. So show exactly where it differentiates as different clubs. It's not in my head or a meltdown,you've just posted bollox and can't show where it differentiates. Nice try at deflection though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnforever1992 Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Have we talked about this before, we did so please don't talk about separate company/club shite. It's the orcs way to troll you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomogganners Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 https://www.oscr.org.uk/search-charity-register/charity-extract/?charitynumber=sc033287 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 I never once mentioned an sfa statement. Your losing it mate. Well come on,show where it determines that this is a new club in the SFA statement i provided. You can't do it because your posting nonsense. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Any chance you could answer my questions instead of ignoring them. Why did you put that forward as a quotation when it had nothing to do with the SFA statement? Point out in the SFA statement where it differentiates on continuity? I never put forward a quotation Why have you quoted me and then ignored my post and posted on something totally unrelated to my related response to a fellow poster whom i had quoted? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnforever1992 Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 (edited) https://www.oscr.org...number=sc033287 Rangers charity fund removed from the scottish charity website? Edited December 7, 2012 by Bairnforever1992 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Any chance you could answer my questions instead of ignoring them. This guy asked a question then waited 8 MINUTES before coming back on and DEMANDING an answer. Orc to the core. Arrogant and obsessed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 What i've posted is the link confirming the Full SFA membership transer.What you put forward as a quote was in fact nothing to do with the transfer and indeed wasn't a quote. So show exactly where it differentiates as different clubs. It's not in my head or a meltdown,you've just posted bollox and can't show where it differentiates. Nice try at deflection though. Point to the post where i put forward a quote. Your either a bit unstable or you have got me mixed up with another poster. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 From your linky.... "The relaunched Ibrox club have obtained the old Rangers' licence to play after the latter headed for liquidation." You see, it's a license to play, nothing else. It has nothing to do with the continuance of the club. (The club that was liquidated) I never put forward a quotation Why have you quoted me and then ignored my post and posted on something totally unrelated to my related response to a fellow poster whom i had quoted? Do you see the large letters,part in bold,you've put that forward as a quotation. That was nothing to do with the SFA statement on the membership transfer. So now can you show where on the SFA statement about the transfer of membership it determines anything about a new club? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomogganners Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Rangers charity fund removed from the scottish charity website? No idea, don't see what the fuss is about if a club wants to donate its gate receipt monies to a charity, crack on. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Point to the post where i put forward a quote. Your either a bit unstable or you have got me mixed up with another poster. I owe you a big apology mate. Sorry i quoted another poster,too much to drink. Again apologies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Do you see the large letters,part in bold,you've put that forward as a quotation. That was nothing to do with the SFA statement on the membership transfer. So now can you show where on the SFA statement about the transfer of membership it determines anything about a new club? Have a look at the names at the top of both of the quotes you provdided. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Have a look at the names at the top of both of the quotes you provdided. I did,as i said i apologise PM on the way. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 I owe you a big apology mate. Sorry i quoted another poster,too much to drink. Again apologies. Accepted. Mistakes happen. Was startin to wonder what the f**k you were on about. Nae worries mate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.