Cowanthebluenose Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 This Phil whateverhisnameis boy really has ra peepul fuming :lol: :lol: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tio Pepe Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Surely the equipment he is waiting for has been delivered by now? Maybe the supplier is insisting upon cash on delivery. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowanthebluenose Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 (edited) Is Charlie's little friend suing the company or the club? I still can't get over that comment by Green. Moron. Edit - Green that is. Not you. (For now ) Edited August 14, 2013 by Cowanthebluenose 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Surely the equipment he is waiting for has been delivered by now? Almost, it came cash on delivery, it's back in storage now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Is Charlie's little friend suing the company or the club? I still can't get over that comment by Green. Moron. Edit - Green that is. Not you. (For now ) He just calls a spade a spade. Oh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 I take it Chuckie and Ahmad are still working together? Is this just a case of bad cop, worse cop? I had forgot about his sevcomedia contributions! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowanthebluenose Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 He just calls a spade a spade. Oh. Brilliant! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowanthebluenose Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 (edited) This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by Cowanthebluenose. View it anyway? Something about having a 'fake laugh' I'm guessing ? Or some rage fuelled post ? Aw bless you put me on ignore because you shat out of a debate so you could continue attention seeking. " :lol: " Edited August 14, 2013 by Cowanthebluenose 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyWellFan Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Aw bless you put me on ignore because you shat out of a debate so you could continue attention seeking. " :lol: " I put you on ignore because most of your posts are ridiculous. I never did get an answer as to what a 'fake laugh' is ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 They have about at least 3 players they could maybe punt off at around a million each I'd reckon,possibly Wallace,Templeton & Law.It would save them from admin but it would make the admin happen at a later date though. I was just saying that it could be a possible strategy and Green has had previous for it at Sheffield Utd. I'd be very surprised if these guys could command fees anything like that - Wallace maybe at a push, but not the other pair. Remember too that the discussion was about the 'strategy' behind this summer's acquisitions. Of the players you mention, only Law falls into this category. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowanthebluenose Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 I put you on ignore because most of your posts are ridiculous. I never did get an answer as to what a 'fake laugh' is ? My posts are ridiculous. Are you not the one who constantly posts in another teams forums with absolute shite remarks with about 4 laugh faces? Every post. Its not hard to understand. I'd be very surprised if these guys could command fees anything like that - Wallace maybe at a push, but not the other pair. Remember too that the discussion was about the 'strategy' behind this summer's acquisitions. Of the players you mention, only Law falls into this category. Wallace would. Templeton there or there abouts. Christ sake Law's only played a few games and we're talking about how much we'd get. Give the guy a chance to play first. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Someone posted some tweets from Phil, I merely commented on the mans obvious and well publicised character flaws, if I insulted him then it was well deserved, I make no apology for it. you seemed to take umbrage with this and asked what was wrong with his tweets, I told you, not once have I asked you to comment on it nor did I ask you to condemn the bigot, so I have no idea why you are introducing this stuff, I agree you should try to make your posts clearer though, it will save you having to admit it later. Typical Ted I'm afraid. Not keen on the message, so the messenger's gonna have to go. You'd think you'd learn. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeWhoWalksBehindTheRows Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Thought it's more like the scene from Pulp Fiction in the basement of the Army Surplus Store .... Sorry to be a total fanny but it was a Second Hand shop 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Wallace would. Templeton there or there abouts. Christ sake Law's only played a few games and we're talking about how much we'd get. Give the guy a chance to play first. Are you following the discussion? It was suggested that bringing in guys this summer was part of a strategy to move them on for money, given the perilous state of Rangers' finances. Some of us have questioned whether this is likely to really be the case. Your observation that Law's only played a few games is therefore to spectacularly miss the point being discussed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowanthebluenose Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Are you following the discussion? It was suggested that bringing in guys this summer was part of a strategy to move them on for money, given the perilous state of Rangers' finances. Some of us have questioned whether this is likely to really be the case. Your observation that Law's only played a few games is therefore to spectacularly miss the point being discussed. In a word, no. You are correct I have missed the entire discussion and only really read the post about their valuations. Although, if that is our philosophy then fine. We should hold out for as much money as we can for players though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 The message was garbled nonsense at best, but please do not let that stop you from having another go at me. And yet, that wasn't the nature of your objection. Instead, you simply said : "Phil really is a horrible human being, a raging bigot of the lowest order." This came before you wished nasty diseases on him. Youngsy did the same with Whyte recently. It's becoming quite fashionable for some of you chaps. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 We should hold out for as much money as we can for players though. Why yes. It would appear that Rangers are in a very strong bargaining position. Play hardball I say. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Wallace would. Templeton there or there abouts. Christ sake Law's only played a few games and we're talking about how much we'd get. Give the guy a chance to play first. Are you following the discussion? It was suggested that bringing in guys this summer was part of a strategy to move them on for money, given the perilous state of Rangers' finances. Some of us have questioned whether this is likely to really be the case. Your observation that Law's only played a few games is therefore to spectacularly miss the point being discussed. Of course not, he's trolling. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowanthebluenose Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Well why should we sell a player we could get more money for? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johncolegrady Posted August 14, 2013 Share Posted August 14, 2013 Sorry to be a total fanny but it was a Second Hand shop Not being pedantic, well I am really. It was a pawn shop! Negotiating with a chimp over a banana. Priceless. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.