hellbhoy Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I believe...if it quacks like a duck then it must be a... If you hadn't noticed that particular plastic duck cannot quack like a real duck, therefore it is a plastic imposter that can be clearly defined from an original real duck should they be placed side by side. Nice one Tedi , I do enjoy it when you make a cnut of your own argument. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 It's a Dodo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Hopefully not ... AWRA is already telling Hearts fans how he is going to blow the championship away next season in the Hearts admin thread... That will be another bookmarked thread to be repeatedly bumped often to show AWRA he stupid he was to jerk off over Boyd if he does not sign for the great pretenders. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Are you referring to this wonder blunder ... (as posted by Tedi in reply and used to back up his argument)? Aye that's it. Certainly clears it all up for me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Are you referring to this wonder blunder ... (as posted by Tedi in reply and used to back up his argument)? Aye, that's the one. Certainly clears it all up for me. What do you think Stoney? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Awaiting The Great Leaders response to his mega UEFA rule interpretation fuckup. Should be a five star performance. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Just goes to show he doesn't understand anything he reads .. can't believe he proudly posted it .... :lol: Not only that but continued to quote from it, for quite some time after. Not one mention of the word 'accounts' in that UEFA quote either. ''UEFA's stated position'' 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Awaiting The Great Leaders response to his mega UEFA rule interpretation fuckup. Should be a five star performance. Aye, now let's be sure to keep it nice and handy from now on. Very useful when having to deal with newbies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Are you referring to this wonder blunder ... (as posted by Tedi in reply and used to back up his argument)? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Are you referring to this wonder blunder ... (as posted by Tedi in reply and used to back up his argument)? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Are you referring to this wonder blunder ... (as posted by Tedi in reply and used to back up his argument)? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Are you referring to this wonder blunder ... (as posted by Tedi in reply and used to back up his argument)? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Are you referring to this wonder blunder ... (as posted by Tedi in reply and used to back up his argument)? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tio Pepe Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 I believe...if it quacks like a duck then it must be a... Do you also believe Mike Yarwood is Larry Grayson and Rory Bremner is Tony Blair? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Our rules allow for the recognition of the “sporting continuity” of a club’s match record, even if that club’s corporate structure had changed. UEFA Praise be the 78 who would not let it go. Now you have to back up this ridiculous claim by adding some authority by way of an official release from UEFA themselves. We won't accept anything other than official UEFA documents as any other source will be contaminated with pish stained tears that make no sense what so ever. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Our rules allow for the recognition of the “sporting continuity” of a club’s match record, even if that club’s corporate structure had changed. UEFA Asking any corporate lawyer, I think you will find that going into liquidation and having your assets bought from your administrators by a company formed for that specific purpose, is not merely a change to your corporate structure. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Now you have to back up this ridiculous claim by adding some authority by way of an official release from UEFA themselves. We won't accept anything other than official UEFA documents as any other source will be contaminated with pish stained tears that make no sense what so ever. Are you referring to this wonder blunder ... (as posted by Tedi in reply and used to back up his argument)? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 The ASA consulted UEFA and this was UEFA`s response. Did UEFA get it wrong? Praise be the 78 who could not let it go. You have already fucked this up once and now you are furthering your stupidity by deliberately misleading everyone by sticking to an ASA released partial interpretation of the full rules UEFA use themselves, and that you yourself supplied an official UEFA response that going newco means new club. Now you have the audacity and blind stupidity to ask did UEFA get it wrong when in fact you are quoting an ASA released interpretation of what UEFA sent them. Just exactly what did ASA ask UEFA when asking for clarity ?, the answer to this if anyone knew would clear up a whole shitload of questions. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 (edited) The ASA consulted UEFA and this was UEFA`s response. Did UEFA get it wrong? Praise be the 78 who could not let it go. To me, the only way to interpret what would appear a glaring contradiction by UEFA, is to accept that for some reason, they are prepared to overlook what is clearly stated in their rule-book (Article 12 in particular) for convenience and harmony. In their response to the question posed by STV, they have quoted (Article 12) directly from the actual rule-book, whereas in their response to the question posed by ASA, they have not done but merely issued an opinion. The rule-book wins for me all the time. ETA:- Also although we know what the STV question actually was, as HB has just pointed out, we are not so clear on what exactly was asked by ASA. Edited April 16, 2014 by Apache Don 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bing (2) Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Our rules allow for the recognition of the sporting continuity of a clubs match record, even if that clubs corporate structure had changed. UEFA Praise be the 78 who would not let it go. So let me get this straight. You are saying the rangers are the sporting wing of the company? that'll go down well at Ibrox. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.