Bendarroch Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 The conclusion that you must have more time for Celtic followers than any other Scottish fans, is however, inescapable. Firstly, spare yourself the embarrassment of walking this amateur psychology line because it's all so much simpler than that errant mince. You, like some others, seem to want to attach an importance to the bletherings on a message board far beyond their value. I meet and talk to fitba supporters all the time - the absolute pish poured out here is rarely (if ever) mirrored in the real world. For example - no one on earth I've ever met responds in conversation by presenting a picture in the wanky way that, say, SS Alba does. That's not to say I don't have a laugh or enjoy some of the humour - it's no bad on occasion. What makes me laugh most of all is the fantasy that anything other than Rangers being back at the top of what's left of Scottish is going to be the final outcome. So I give back as I get on here, returning the love in kind - within the limits of the grassing community and those who fake offence as a facade for their grassing. And, I left the sporting wing comment to last because 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Ffs i have diddies trying to choose my friends for me now. Still waiting Wisbit.... in your own time. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 I agree wholeheartedly with this sentiment. I'd extend it in this direction: In rejecting Rangers, there is no automatic positioning to adopt a fondness for Celtic. Only a certain breed of Rangers fan knows the logic behind that thinking I think it's perfectly clear that some don't like Rangers or the plastics. I think the issue arises when - and only when - some jump all over Rangers supporters on whatever issue is at hand and notably avoid slamming the sporting wing for anything similar. Only a certain breed of sporting wingers know why they would do it. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 I talk to them in the taxi but i don't associate with them..Maybe i should say socialize with them. Nothing weird about that...I am Rangers through and through and a Loyalist. I have never hidden that on here. Making a concious decision, not to socialise with people who either -or both- have been brought up with a different religion or support a different football team to yourself - IN THE 21st CENTURY! FFS! - is quite simply PATHETIC. Do you extend this exclusion to other members of society? Actually, no need to answer that question. I have heard it said, that there are 2x No8s and I've noticed some starkly contradictory posts attributed to you but this is a sad admission. Is it 'Sober No8' & 'Drunk No8' per chance? I ask this even though IMO, this would be no defence whatsoever. Having read the follow ups to the above post, I can't see any acceptance of the 'heat of the moment' excuse. You basically, are practising your own little apartheid system. Altogether now... 'We Are Truly Pitiful' 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Not sure bud. Don't drink there and its no where near the ground. 15 - 20 minute walk i'd guess, ya lazy bugger 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Anyone who chooses not to socialise or associate with an entire group of people because of their sporting or political affiliations is a complete and utter cretin. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Still no mention of Vicky? Is he actually just going to brass neck it and pretend it never happened? You have to admire his chutzpah if nothing else. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Sporting wing Scotlands shame, we know... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 And the guys on here are meant to be the saner element of ra peeps? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Lay off the haribo's, you're getting a sugar rush johnny. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Well yes, "associate" was clearly the wrong word. The follow up is actually genuiely weird here though. Are you seriously suggesting that because of your political leanings and allegiance to a football team, you won't 'socialize' with certain others whose affiliations are different? Many of us are accused on this thread of bitterness, obsession and hatred. I doubt if many come close to your stance here though. I certainly don't. So when he meets up with Tedi (both have said they do socialise on occasion), it's on the clear understanding that Tedi, does not bring his Irish, Catholic, Celtic supporting wife. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 FAO....Wisbit. C&P from my post of the 16th of February 2012....... 'I honestly cant see any justice in this at all towards the other clubs in the league. I cannot find the words to express how badly i feel about this whole scenario but as a football supporter i just feel a 10 point deduction is just a joke...a fucking joke!!! I personally feel relegation to the 3rd division is an apt punishment' Now how do you want to do this? Individual apologies or just one big apology. I'll leave that entirely up to your good self SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS on that ya bawbag Very pescient of you, No. 8. Except they weren't relegated. And D3 was a lifeline, not a punishment. Do continue with your greatest hits from last year - they're mildly amusing. Ya bawbag. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Have I? When was this? I've been on holiday for the last week, but have decided against boring you all with details of my itinerary. WRK and I don't agree on everything, what with having independent minds and all that. I see him as one of the good guys though and haven't, as far as I'm aware, sought any distancing. FWIW, I don't think the comments about transvestites etc (made by someone other than WRK incidentally) were either relevant or appropriate. Unlike WRK and a few others, I wouldn't seek to defend them. Still happy to be seen as a 'partner in crime' though. "Good Guy", is it? How very dare you! Actually, MT, as is a frequent MO of mine, rather than defending the comments on TVs and Tootsie, I was pointing out Bendarroch's knee-jerk reaction to an attack on his beloved Amigo. As per also frequently, it does appear open to misinterpretation. My bad. I've got no problems with anyone's sexual identity, having a reasonably varied family and social circle myself. Now, when's our next bank job? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 I think it's perfectly clear that some don't like Rangers or the plastics. I think the issue arises when - and only when - some jump all over Rangers supporters on whatever issue is at hand and notably avoid slamming the sporting wing for anything similar. Only a certain breed of sporting wingers know why they would do it. Maybe because this isn't the BCALT. Or maybe because you and a large proportinon of the berrz on here are such obvious hate-filled bigots, who can't make a post without belittling or abusing followers of ANY other team, frequently accusing them of being another flavour of bigot. Just a theory? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 The sporting wing of the BNP are Scotlands shame.. or is the UVF or UDA or KFC?? WATP Scotlands shame is our insult, get you're own Easy now - it's not KFC. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Still no mention of Vicky? Is he actually just going to brass neck it and pretend it never happened? You have to admire his chutzpah if nothing else. We Are Two People? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotbawmad Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Lay off the haribo's, you're getting a sugar rush johnny. That reminds of the latest sugar daddy you're about to get... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 Maybe because this isn't the BCALT. Or maybe because you and a large proportinon of the berrz on here are such obvious hate-filled bigots, who can't make a post without belittling or abusing followers of ANY other team, frequently accusing them of being another flavour of bigot. Just a theory? You have to be the most bigoted guy on here Norman and and ..... Your whole life revolves around it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 You have to be the most bigoted guy on here Norman and and ..... Your whole life revolves around it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted July 14, 2013 Share Posted July 14, 2013 You have to be the most bigoted guy on here Norman and and ..... Your whole life revolves around it. No doubt you've got many examples of my "bigotry", then, Vicky..... (Before you gleefully start fantasising, embroidering and straight-out lying - having a generally socialist, inclusive mindset which dislikes discrimination doesn't make one a bigot. IMO, of course. The fact that I don't like rangers and their acolytes is based on their (and their ex-partners) acting as a sea-anchor on Scotland's progress towards civilsation) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.