bennett Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 9 hours ago, Insaintee said: How come Sevco don't have enough money to see them through to next season? We don't? -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aim Here Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 1 hour ago, bennett said: We don't? Well you do, in the same way that someone that's just pawned their telly, their stereo and their microwave has got enough money to see them through to payday. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 21 hours ago, bennett said: We don't? Keep up 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 1 hour ago, Insaintee said: Keep up So that'll be another insolvency event then? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 2 hours ago, bennett said: So that'll be another insolvency event then? Your first, I believe. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz FFC Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 4 hours ago, The DA said: Your first, I believe. You do have to wonder what script the media and SFA would take with regards to this. If Sevco go into administration do they say this is the 1st time or 2nd and get the relevant punishment? All the Tea in China says all the media stick together and sing from the same hymn sheet (produced by Traynor) too 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 7 hours ago, Gaz FFC said: You do have to wonder what script the media and SFA would take with regards to this. If Sevco go into administration do they say this is the 1st time or 2nd and get the relevant punishment? All the Tea in China says all the media stick together and sing from the same hymn sheet (produced by Traynor) too That's not a decision anyone will have to make, Gaz. The increased penalty for a second admin event only applies if it happens within 5 years of the first. So, they were 'safe' as of last year. In any case, it'll be the holding vehicle that goes bust, not the ethereal club. The club will sail blithely on forever, racking up trophies won via the debts shed by a succession of parent companies. And they'll probably win those trophies playing out of an SFA-owned Hampden for which The The The... Rangers will pay a peppercorn rent. Of course, the argument will be that we could all do the same if we had hard enough necks. </tinfoilhat> Might edit this after the hangover goes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aim Here Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 7 hours ago, Gaz FFC said: You do have to wonder what script the media and SFA would take with regards to this. If Sevco go into administration do they say this is the 1st time or 2nd and get the relevant punishment? All the Tea in China says all the media stick together and sing from the same hymn sheet (produced by Traynor) too There's a time limit on the multiple-admin-event punishment, and it's 5 years, so the question is no longer applicable to Neo-Rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 Had such a thing happened during the five year period, it would have been treated as a second event and punished accordingly. There wouldn't really have been a debate because as we know, our cowardly authorities treated continuation as seamless and unequivocal. Rangers fans would have claimed that those of us who question such an outlook would be conflicted. We wouldn't have been though, as those making such decisions would not be us. As pointed out though, the question is no longer relevant. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 Are Rangers 2012 FC compliant with UEFA financial fair play regulations in the event of them qualifying for 2018 /19 tournaments? (not really 'laughing at Rangers' as per the thread title*) *except it is a bit. Legitimate question though, minus the laughing 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest of Dean Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 6 minutes ago, Ken Fitlike said: Are Rangers 2012 FC compliant with UEFA financial fair play regulations in the event of them qualifying for 2018 /19 tournaments? (not really 'laughing at Rangers' as per the thread title*) *except it is a bit. Legitimate question though, minus the laughing Ken Fitlike dribbling all over the forum again. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest of Dean Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 55 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: Had such a thing happened during the five year period, it would have been treated as a second event and punished accordingly. There wouldn't really have been a debate because as we know, our cowardly authorities treated continuation as seamless and unequivocal. Rangers fans would have claimed that those of us who question such an outlook would be conflicted. We wouldn't have been though, as those making such decisions would not be us. As pointed out though, the question is no longer relevant. Not only "our cowardly authorities" but UEFA and many non-football legal bodies as well. You know that though but have an aversion to speaking the truth. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 1 hour ago, Monkey Tennis said: Had such a thing happened during the five year period, it would have been treated as a second event and punished accordingly. There wouldn't really have been a debate because as we know, our cowardly authorities treated continuation as seamless and unequivocal. Rangers fans would have claimed that those of us who question such an outlook would be conflicted. We wouldn't have been though, as those making such decisions would not be us. As pointed out though, the question is no longer relevant. Finally off the fence then.... -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 17 minutes ago, Forest of Dean said: Ken Fitlike dribbling all over the forum again. will you get back with an answer though........? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest of Dean Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 3 minutes ago, Ken Fitlike said: will you get back with an answer though........? The answer is yes obviously - you know that though. How old are you? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 30 minutes ago, bennett said: Finally off the fence then.... Nah, Bennett, you'd still characterise me as very much on it. I've been entirely consistent throughout in seeing continuity as a messy, guddly affair. Rangers is kinda the same as before, yet also kinda new. Obviously, you struggle to accommodate any sort of nuanced reading, so call it fence sitting, as is your right. I've not changed my view on this at all. I certainly question the notion of seamless, unequivocal continuity, which is all I said in the post that somehow got you animated. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 46 minutes ago, Forest of Dean said: Not only "our cowardly authorities" but UEFA and many non-football legal bodies as well. You know that though but have an aversion to speaking the truth. The other football authorities took their lead from ours. I'm honestly not too fussed. You can definitely cling to your history if you need to and it pleases you. It's quite the most disgusting one in Scottish sport, but you hold on if it matters. Questions of continuity have always interested me much less than those surrounding the notion of title stripping. That's where dreadful injustice still resides. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 The answer is yes obviously - you know that though. How old are you? Is that Yes you will get back with an answer, or Yes Rangers 2012FC are fully compliant with UEFA ffp criteria?I am old enough ‘to know better’ but happy to be able to say ‘nah, f**k it.....’....and you are an alias of which previous incarnation? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 The other football authorities took their lead from ours. Ah yes, the SFA, which is pretty much a branch office of ‘Rangers’ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 4 minutes ago, Ken Fitlike said: Ah yes, the SFA, which is pretty much a branch office of ‘Rangers’ The organisation that gave us "armageddon", "withering on the vine" and "slow lingering death". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.