Confidemus Posted March 11, 2014 Author Share Posted March 11, 2014 Uh, what? Ah there you are. You ready to apologise for stating Nicola Sturgeon told "shameful lies"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Ah there you are. You ready to apologise for stating Nicola Sturgeon told "shameful lies"? I'm still waiting on your apology from yesterday's debacle? But I've already illustrated that Sturgeon told shameful lies. And not for the first time, after her lies about the position of Scotland as a co-equal successor state, which were blatant and repeated lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 I'm still waiting on your apology from yesterday's debacle? But I've already illustrated that Sturgeon told shameful lies. And not for the first time, after her lies about the position of Scotland as a co-equal successor state, which were blatant and repeated lies. I take it you agree that Scotland should not take it's share of assets and liabilities? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 I take it you agree that Scotland should not take it's share of assets and liabilities? No. I don't agree with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted March 11, 2014 Author Share Posted March 11, 2014 I'm still waiting on your apology from yesterday's debacle? But I've already illustrated that Sturgeon told shameful lies. And not for the first time, after her lies about the position of Scotland as a co-equal successor state, which were blatant and repeated lies. You'll have quite the wait, chuckles. Please tell me how Nicola Sturgeon told "shameful lies" about almost a million being in poverty due to this Government's policies? She was utterly correct in what she said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 You'll have quite the wait, chuckles. Why? Why are you refusing to apologise for being utterly wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted March 11, 2014 Author Share Posted March 11, 2014 Why? Why are you refusing to apologise for being utterly wrong? Because you, my comical little friend, have been utterly, completely incorrect on numerous occasions previously, yet you skate over it as you have literally just done. Truth be told, I'm not sure what I should be apologising for, as I struggle to maintain interest and attention when it comes to your opinion, but whatever it is, it pales into insignificance compared to the sheer amount of lies, whataboutery, deflection and insults you perpetuate on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Because you, my comical little friend, have been utterly, completely incorrect on numerous occasions previously, yet you skate over it as you have literally just done. So you were educated on your lie, and yet choose not to apologise for it? Interesting. Not surprising of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Utter tosh. Housing benefit and council tax benefit is not "money" given to people. That's literally what it is. Further, it's not you "merely pointing out" anything. It would cost the SG a fairly large chunk of their budget to simply negate a dreadful Westminster policy. But you said it didn't save much money. Make your mind up. Either it doesn't save much money, so doesn't cost much to negate, or it does save a lot of money, in which case you have to factor that into assessing how worthwhile it is. Make your mind up. I would say it would be up to your soon to be extinct chums and their bosom buddies the Tories to sort that one out. Don'tcha think? #analysis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 A Lib dem even mentioning the bedroom tax with regards to the SG really does have a solid brass neck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 No. I don't agree with that. Surely a continuator state should take all the bad as well as the good out of it's position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Surely a continuator state should take all the bad as well as the good out of it's position. I'm not sure what your point is here. Are you saying Scotland should get no assets after secession? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Surely a continuator state should take all the bad as well as the good out of it's position. "Continuator states" relate to being party to treaties under international law. It has nothing to do with anything not covered by treaties under international law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 I'm not sure what your point is here. Are you saying Scotland should get no assets after secession? I'd be quite happy for us to get no liabilities or assets, ain't going to happen though, for all the stuff we've heard so far, Scotland will take a fair share of assets and liabilities and Westminster will pay us rent for as long as Trident is here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 I'd be quite happy for us to get no liabilities or assets, ain't going to happen though, for all the stuff we've heard so far, Scotland will take a fair share of assets and liabilities Yes, that's very much what would happen despite the SNP's nonsense to the contrary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted March 11, 2014 Author Share Posted March 11, 2014 HB really does find it impossible to put his point across without being rude to someone. He's like a toddler demanding sweeties in a shop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Yes, that's very much what would happen despite the SNP's nonsense to the contrary. A currency union will happen as well despite Gideon's nonsense to the contrary. I'd much rather a Scottish pound and no debt though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 Wrong - Mr Swinney, to applause from Labour and SNP benches, said yesterday: “I give parliament the assurance today that if the DWP says no, the Scottish Government will put in place a scheme to make this additional £12m available to social landlords so that we need not see any evictions in Scotland this year as a result solely of the bedroom tax.” http://www.snp.org/media-centre/news/2014/mar/westminster-must-stop-stalling-bedroom-tax Oh dear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 http://www.snp.org/media-centre/news/2014/mar/westminster-must-stop-stalling-bedroom-tax Oh dear. But but but. The point is the SNP are within their rights to cut other services to pay for it Lib-Con are totally blameless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted March 11, 2014 Share Posted March 11, 2014 http://www.snp.org/media-centre/news/2014/mar/westminster-must-stop-stalling-bedroom-tax Oh dear. You can't go a day without making a complete spectacle of yourself, can you Parp? Which part of this wasn't clear? “I give parliament the assurance today that if the DWP says no, the Scottish Government will put in place a scheme to make this additional £12m available to social landlords so that we need not see any evictions in Scotland this year as a result solely of the bedroom tax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.