AUFC90 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 The SNP used oil prices as a central plank for independence for decades so what they predicted is a bit more pertinent than the forecasts of other bodies not using the price as an electoral strategy.As for Alex and the EU ive nae idea about him being cleared of "wrongdoing" but in my humble opinion he was "economical with the truth" through the whole membership farago.Ecks pants were on fire all right. Eck was cleared of misleading parliament. I'll recommend they invest in a larger crystal ball for oil prices in future. Funnily enough, the oil price is on it's arse and our economy is still roughly level with England. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Rider Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Of course the nationalists are all free thinkers who independently all repeat the SNP mantra. Run along. Awful fishing attempt. Not good enough. I asked why Britnats are so servile. Care to explain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todders Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Stop greeting fide Do you actually enjoy being lied to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Rider Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Do you actually enjoy being lied to? He's servile so the answer, although it must grate for him, is YES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtgilphead Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 Nae actual proof these are lies though. Oh, there's plenty proof if you know what to look for. The Express must have approached TS - there's no way TS would put out a vague press release saying they're investigating a company unless TS also provided some detail as to the scam involved or specific safety concern, This means that the Express must have a link with the complainant. The fact that the Express contacted TS before CACS notified the complaint to TS proves that the Express knew the complaint was being made before they contacted TS. As they must have a link with the complainant, why is it unclear what the complaint is about? The only logical conclusion is that they do know what it's about, and it's a minor civil breach. This is proved by the fact that the complaint was sent to TS as a notification rather than as a referral. Accordingly, the Express are lying through their teeth when they say "Although the the details of the grievance are unknown" They go on to say that "Trading Standards website says it will investigate cases where companies have misled or pressured customers into buying products or services, failed to carry out work properly, or sold unsafe, dangerous, fake or counterfeit items.", but fail to mention the civil advice role. My guess would be that the bulbs arrived broken, or that a refund is taking longer than the consumer would like. It could even be that there's no breach at all. The Citizens Advice Consumer Service gave the relevant advice then, as usual, passed on the details of EVERY complaint they received that day to Trading Standards, whether the complaint was justified or not. But that wouldn't really be worthy of a "SNPBaaaaad" smear, would it. Far better to twist the facts beyond any reasonable interpretation and hope that the unthinking Unionists assume there's no smoke without fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loondave1 Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 ^^^^^ Not actually the "lies" I mentioned initialy but your ill judged rush to refute something I wasn't actually talking about says a lot.All that typing wasted as well not to mention me having to scroll past it.Other than that great work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todders Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 ^^^^^ Not actually the "lies" I mentioned initialy but your ill judged rush to refute something I wasn't actually talking about says a lot.All that typing wasted as well not to mention me having to scroll past it.Other than that great work. Another unthinking unionist all to willing to ignore the evidence at the end of his nose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtgilphead Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 So, which bits of the story are you suggesting are correct then? Be as specific as you like. And feel free to suggest how you became aware of the specific contents of my post if you scrolled past it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted October 22, 2015 Share Posted October 22, 2015 I am sorely disappointed, I thought that this was going to be about Nicola's vage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted October 23, 2015 Author Share Posted October 23, 2015 Nae actual proof these are lies though.Oil prices however are a proven SNP porky that is absolutely demonstrable.Or the EU letter that didn't exist that's absolutely factual also.Glass houses and stones im afraid. Well there are. If you're not to closed minded to see the truth. Each of those I quoted are demonstrable lies. http://wingsoverscotland.com/when-youre-happy-and-you-know-it/#more-59141 http://wingsoverscotland.com/the-lies-you-get/ http://wingsoverscotland.com/lies-and-replies/ And if you come back with "Oh, I'm not reading Wings Over Scotland", I'll take that as not only defeat but the usual Britnat pigheadedness in refusing to accept the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loondave1 Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Well there are. If you're not to closed minded to see the truth. Each of those I quoted are demonstrable lies. http://wingsoverscotland.com/when-youre-happy-and-you-know-it/#more-59141 http://wingsoverscotland.com/the-lies-you-get/ http://wingsoverscotland.com/lies-and-replies/ And if you come back with "Oh, I'm not reading Wings Over Scotland", I'll take that as not only defeat but the usual Britnat pigheadedness in refusing to accept the truth. All I read was a slightly mad blokes viewpoint and his own spin here and there but pretty well just more speculation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 The bitterness and hate just oozes out of fide , an utter loonball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Well there are. If you're not to closed minded to see the truth. Each of those I quoted are demonstrable lies. http://wingsoverscotland.com/when-youre-happy-and-you-know-it/#more-59141 http://wingsoverscotland.com/the-lies-you-get/ http://wingsoverscotland.com/lies-and-replies/ And if you come back with "Oh, I'm not reading Wings Over Scotland", I'll take that as not only defeat but the usual Britnat pigheadedness in refusing to accept the truth. Stuart Campbell's Wikipedia entry says "Born in Stirling, he moved to Bath in 1991... He has lived in Somerset ever since...A long term supporter of Scottish independence, Campbell launched a political blog called "Wings Over Scotland"..." Is that true? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loondave1 Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Stuart Campbell's Wikipedia entry says "Born in Stirling, he moved to Bath in 1991... He has lived in Somerset ever since...A long term supporter of Scottish independence, Campbell launched a political blog called "Wings Over Scotland"..." Is that true? Naw it'll be the Unionist WIKI smearing him.......yawn.Having read the entry he appears to have "Looney" written through him like a stick of rock or he is the "voice of reason" if your a bit simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loondave1 Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 The bitterness and hate just oozes out of fide , an utter loonballIt's great fun though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Naw it'll be the Unionist WIKI smearing him.......yawn.Having read the entry he appears to have "Looney" written through him like a stick of rock or he is the "voice of reason" if your a bit simple. The Herald - http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13170835._The_bottom_line_is_I_don_t_particularly_care_if_people_don_t_want_to_be_associated_with_us_/ "Campbell is the founder of Wings Over Scotland, a controversial pro-independence site that gets an astonishing 4.5 million page views a month. Born in Stirling, he moved to Bath in 1991 for a job at a computer magazine and became a notorious reviewer of video games. He has lived in Somerset ever since." Confirmed on Wings Over Scotland - "http://wingsoverscotland.com/hello-daily-mail-readers/" Totally bizarre! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted October 23, 2015 Author Share Posted October 23, 2015 The bitterness and hate just oozes out of fide , an utter loonball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 All I read was a slightly mad blokes viewpoint and his own spin here and there but pretty well just more speculation.Really ? The first link has a list of headlines during the referendum. All shite, some mental but ALL printed in newspapers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loondave1 Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Maybe Campbell could stand for the SNP in Taunton or somewhere like Yeovil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevthedee Posted October 23, 2015 Share Posted October 23, 2015 Do you actually enjoy being lied to? No i hate when the SNP tell lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.