Ad Lib Posted March 12, 2016 Share Posted March 12, 2016 So sending a a decent man with a family to jail for a decade because he killed a deer and set a fire to stop a forest fire from destroying his property is something you don't give a f**k about? Also factor in that the Obama administration had to go through the appeal process they so wanted this man in jail, and the federal government had been harassing their family for years because they wouldn't sell their land to the government. In the context of breaking the law to violently occupy a federal government building in protest at their grievances, yes, it is something I could not give a f**k about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted March 12, 2016 Share Posted March 12, 2016 So sending a a decent man with a family to jail for a decade because he killed a deer and set a fire to stop a forest fire from destroying his property is something you don't give a f**k about? Also factor in that the Obama administration had to go through the appeal process they so wanted this man in jail, and the federal government had been harassing their family for years because they wouldn't sell their land to the government. All right, you don't have to cry. Was he a big friend of yours? Big nasty black president sounds horrid again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yank Mike Posted March 12, 2016 Share Posted March 12, 2016 Holding political rallies that appeal to racist white people in a multicultural area in order to try to stir up disorder and then to blame it on ethnic minorities. Sounds a lot like the Battle of Cable Street and what the EDL do. Pretty fascist. Don't know what the Battle of Cable Street is. Heard of the EDL, but don't know whether they are European fascists or patriotic British folks. The media likes to confuse the two and I haven't done my research on them. If they are fascists I don't like them. The point is that socialists and black nationalists and Hispanics who advocate the recovery of the Mexican cession could hold a peaceful rally in any majority white area of this country. Apparently somebody who is democratic and centrist, but opposes illegal immigration, can't hold a rally in a non-white area. Maybe that is why we worry about the future of a multicultural America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Name me one country where British troops are occupying land without either the consent of the relevant government or where they are not a party in a war. The relevant government at the time of the occupation or after regime change? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yank Mike Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 I find that a bit unlikely, but presumably you have evidence to back it up? Well, apparently I read that in the Daily Mail. Maybe. Maybe not. lol. Considering there were attempts to raid the stage before the event I'm gonna believe them on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Don't know what the Battle of Cable Street is. Heard of the EDL, but don't know whether they are European fascists or patriotic British folks. The media likes to confuse the two and I haven't done my research on them. If they are fascists I don't like them. The point is that socialists and black nationalists and Hispanics who advocate the recovery of the Mexican cession could hold a peaceful rally in any majority white area of this country. Apparently somebody who is democratic and centrist, but opposes illegal immigration, can't hold a rally in a non-white area. Maybe that is why we worry about the future of a multicultural America. Your man approves of Putin's tactics and of China's at Tiananmen Square. He promises to ban the press from saying nasty things about him if he becomes President. He encourages his fans to beat up dissenters. It does not bode well for your constitutional rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Well, apparently I read that in the Daily Mail. Maybe. Maybe not. lol. Considering there were attempts to raid the stage before the event I'm gonna believe them on this one. So you made it up, ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Don't know what the Battle of Cable Street is. Heard of the EDL, but don't know whether they are European fascists or patriotic British folks. The media likes to confuse the two and I haven't done my research on them. If they are fascists I don't like them. The point is that socialists and black nationalists and Hispanics who advocate the recovery of the Mexican cession could hold a peaceful rally in any majority white area of this country. Apparently somebody who is democratic and centrist, but opposes illegal immigration, can't hold a rally in a non-white area. Maybe that is why we worry about the future of a multicultural America. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cable_Street Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yank Mike Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 So you made it up, ok. Naw. The police had to pull people off the stage before the event. People in attendance have talked about hearing these plans. Today a person reached the stage before the Secret Service rushed the stage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yank Mike Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cable_Street Haha. The first paragraph mentions Oswald Mosley. Of course I don't support anything he was involved in. Will read the rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Haha. The first paragraph mentions Oswald Mosley. Of course I don't support anything he was involved in. Will read the rest. Don't worry, British politics past and modern is just a nest of c***s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yank Mike Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cable_Street I think a march through a neighborhood and a speech inside a building are two different things. I also think that you have to consider the context. Mosley had a long history as a racial fascist and was attempting to intimidate the people in that neighborhood. Trump has no history has a racist (in fact his personal history is filled with black friends and foreign workers) and was just trying to spread his views on the border peacefully and democratically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Don't know what the Battle of Cable Street is. Heard of the EDL, but don't know whether they are European fascists or patriotic British folks. The media likes to confuse the two and I haven't done my research on them. If they are fascists I don't like them. I don't understand why you seem to be wearing ignorance as a badge of honour. The point is that socialists and black nationalists and Hispanics who advocate the recovery of the Mexican cession could hold a peaceful rally in any majority white area of this country. Apparently somebody who is democratic and centrist, but opposes illegal immigration, can't hold a rally in a non-white area. Maybe that is why we worry about the future of a multicultural America. Trump isn't democratic and centrist. He's an immigrant hating racist fascist. He is the Oswald Moseley of his time and country. The relevant government at the time of the occupation or after regime change? The legitimate one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 I think a march through a neighborhood and a speech inside a building are two different things. I also think that you have to consider the context. Mosley had a long history as a racial fascist and was attempting to intimidate the people in that neighborhood. Trump has no history has a racist (in fact his personal history is filled with black friends and foreign workers) and was just trying to spread his views on the border peacefully and democratically. I'm not a racist because I have an *insert minority here. OK then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yank Mike Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 I'm not a racist because I have an *insert minority here. OK then. Except it's "I have 100s of minority friends and 1000s of minority employees" here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Except it's "I have 100s of minority friends and 1000s of minority employees" here. These will be the ethnic minority employees his casinos would make disappear every time the Donald came into town? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Except it's "I have 100s of minority friends and 1000s of minority employees" here. The bloke can say what he wants to get what he wants, he even had his hand down Alex Salmond's trousers for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yank Mike Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Trump isn't democratic and centrist. He's an immigrant hating racist fascist. He is the Oswald Moseley of his time and country. Would like to point out that Immigrant hating, racist, and fascist are three different ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yank Mike Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 The bloke can say what he wants to get what he wants, he even had his hand down Alex Salmond's trousers for a while. Yep. He fully admits that he tried to buy all politicians. Said it worked most of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 Yep. He fully admits that he tried to buy all politicians. Said it worked most of the time. Did he shed any light whether Eck had a happy ending? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.