G51 Red Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 On July 18, 2017 at 19:12, fan of the juniors said: So abuse on an open forum is allowed? Assume you haven't seen the campaigns aimed at stopping abuse & bullying online ? Phone the polis then , my man . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 I don't Diss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 So hear that this is going to a tribunal with Pollok unwilling to move from their original valuation of the player . Should defiantly add a bit of spice to Saturdays fixture . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsidebrazilians Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 1 minute ago, fan of the juniors said: So hear that this is going to a tribunal with Pollok unwilling to move from their original valuation of the player . Should defiantly add a bit of spice to Saturdays fixture . Oh yeah it will be handbags at dawn with the 2 treasurers. Donkey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 Won't be there myself . No gettin a penny from me until they pay what they owe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KT91 Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 Until they pay what they owe? You make it sound like they've agreed a transfer fee, took the player, then decided not to pay. The players' contract had expired and he decided to sign with another club. It's hardly dodgy transfer dealings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 Until they pay what they owe? You make it sound like they've agreed a transfer fee, took the player, then decided not to pay. The players' contract had expired and he decided to sign with another club. It's hardly dodgy transfer dealings. Did I start the original topic? Just commenting the FACT that they owe money for a player & they are unwilling to negotiate a settlement . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KT91 Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 I never once said you started the topic, calm down. As far as I am aware they don't owe anything for the player and obviously Pollok feel the same way. If the tables were turned I'm sure club would have the exact same stance. Why would a club just give money to another club if they didn't need to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 I never once said you started the topic, calm down. As far as I am aware they don't owe anything for the player and obviously Pollok feel the same way. If the tables were turned I'm sure club would have the exact same stance. Why would a club just give money to another club if they didn't need to? Pollok don't feel the same way as they made an initial offer that was refused . I won't state it on here as that is between the clubs . But what I will say is that Ladeside were initially looking for £6 grand but were more than happy to negotiate . Pollok offered less & never budged from that offer so it is now going to a tribunal . They are the facts of the matter & no one can deny them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KT91 Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 That is an astonishing figure to demand for a player that's contract has expired. I thought development fees were based on length of time the player has been with the club and the standard of facilities at the club (which would relate to how much the player has developed). Hence why I was sure Kilbirnie are not entitled to anything as they are a category 4 club (as are almost all Junior sides). Category 4 clubs aren't entitled to any development fee. I'm sure anyone on here would struggle to name an occasion where a Junior club has had to pay another Junior club a development fee for a young player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archieb Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 Fair enough as that's what tribunals are for in this game. Sad that fotj feels the need to boycott a game over it Or that anyone should describe what's gone on as dodgy dealing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 Oh yeah it will be handbags at dawn with the 2 treasurers. Donkey No but I'm sure the away fans will be a tad more vocal than the 1-1 draw last season lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rednblack Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 Pollok don't feel the same way as they made an initial offer that was refused . I won't state it on here as that is between the clubs . But what I will say is that Ladeside were initially looking for £6 grand but were more than happy to negotiate . Pollok offered less & never budged from that offer so it is now going to a tribunal . They are the facts of the matter & no one can deny them If Kilbirnie wanted 6k and Pollok offered 2k and nobody is budging surely a tribunal would settle it at 4 k or is that to simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackD1908 Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 From my poor understanding of the way these fees are calculated and the rumour circulating the terraces about how munched we offered. I'd say it was a fair deal. Did Ladeside pay Stranraer £6k when they signed Forde originally? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 If Kilbirnie wanted 6k and Pollok offered 2k and nobody is budging surely a tribunal would settle it at 4 k or is that to simple. Far far too simple mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsidebrazilians Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 19 minutes ago, fan of the juniors said: Pollok don't feel the same way as they made an initial offer that was refused . I won't state it on here as that is between the clubs . But what I will say is that Ladeside were initially looking for £6 grand but were more than happy to negotiate . Pollok offered less & never budged from that offer so it is now going to a tribunal . They are the facts of the matter & no one can deny them 6 grand for a player you paid £500 quid for. Aye right. Out of contract and wanted to move on. You will be lucky to get £1200 if that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsidebrazilians Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 58 minutes ago, fan of the juniors said: Won't be there myself . No gettin a penny from me until they pay what they owe Well that's one less trouble maker to worry about on Saturday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fan of the juniors Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 Well that's one less trouble maker to worry about on Saturday Never caused 1 bit of bother in my life at a match buddy so put your rod away . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsidebrazilians Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 There only wanting money cause there club is in the crapper financially . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsidebrazilians Posted August 17, 2017 Share Posted August 17, 2017 Just now, fan of the juniors said: Never caused 1 bit of bother in my life at a match buddy so put your rod away . Better a rod than a glass bottle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.