doulikefish Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 Sir Keith will be pictured soon digging a trench on a beach near Dover shortly 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted January 15 Share Posted January 15 4 hours ago, StellarHibee said: It's almost as if he's one of them. He is one of them. His middle name could, or should be Margaret Thatcher. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 So tuition fees will stay in England under Starmer. It’s an interesting strategy, vote for us as we’re not going to do any of the things we promised. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/keir-starmer-indicates-he-will-ditch-leadership-pledge-to-scrap-tuition-fees_uk_63c3b84de4b0cbfd55f3c7e3 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 tl,dr: Keef is a Tory c**t says Sturgeon. Sturgeon accuses Starmer of being 'pale imitation' of Tories and calls his NHS plans 'dispiriting' At her news conference, asked about Keir Starmer’s claim that the SNP and the Tories are both exploiting the gender recognition bill for partisan advantage (see 10.22am), Nicola Sturgeon said that this had only become a constitutional issue because Westminster was refusing to accept the right of the Scottish parliament to legislate on a matter within its own competence. She went on: “So, if anybody is trying to use it politically, it’s those Westminster politicians.” She pointed out that most Labour MSPs voted for the bill. And she said the Scottish government accepted an amendment, from Labour, saying the bill would not affect the Equality Act. So Starmer needed to understand this was not just an SNP bill, she said; it was legislation backed by a large number of MSPs. Sturgeon also said that she found Starmer’s comments on the NHS in his interview with Laura Kuenssberg yesterday “pretty dispiriting”. She claimed that some of what he was saying was “quite dangerous”, because he implied people with serious conditions should not consult their GP, or should bypass their GP. She said Starmer may have intended to say something different. And she said Starmer should be committing to invest more in the NHS, and to reverse Brexit, to address the staffing problem in the health service. She went on: Keir Stamer needs to stop trying to be a pale imitation of the Tory government he’s seeking to replace, and actually start offering some positive alternative. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brother Blades Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 7 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: tl,dr: Keef is a Tory c**t says Sturgeon. Sturgeon accuses Starmer of being 'pale imitation' of Tories and calls his NHS plans 'dispiriting' At her news conference, asked about Keir Starmer’s claim that the SNP and the Tories are both exploiting the gender recognition bill for partisan advantage (see 10.22am), Nicola Sturgeon said that this had only become a constitutional issue because Westminster was refusing to accept the right of the Scottish parliament to legislate on a matter within its own competence. She went on: “So, if anybody is trying to use it politically, it’s those Westminster politicians.” She pointed out that most Labour MSPs voted for the bill. And she said the Scottish government accepted an amendment, from Labour, saying the bill would not affect the Equality Act. So Starmer needed to understand this was not just an SNP bill, she said; it was legislation backed by a large number of MSPs. Sturgeon also said that she found Starmer’s comments on the NHS in his interview with Laura Kuenssberg yesterday “pretty dispiriting”. She claimed that some of what he was saying was “quite dangerous”, because he implied people with serious conditions should not consult their GP, or should bypass their GP. She said Starmer may have intended to say something different. And she said Starmer should be committing to invest more in the NHS, and to reverse Brexit, to address the staffing problem in the health service. She went on: Keir Stamer needs to stop trying to be a pale imitation of the Tory government he’s seeking to replace, and actually start offering some positive alternative. Don’t worry Jedi* will be on to reassure us all that Keith HAD to say all that to fool the electorate and things will be completely different if the get the keys to number 10, he will also set us right that in fact it’s Sturgeon & the Natzis who really want to privatise parts of the NHS. Personally I don’t think Nicola has gone far enough, current Labour are more than a pale imitation it Tories, they are Tories! *no he won’t he’s either banned or slinked off when the truth became clear. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Wolf Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 As I'm trying to eradicate the c word from my vocabulary I have literally nothing to say about Starmy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leith Green Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 (edited) Anyone else think its more than a coincidence that Starmer is "onside" with Rishi regarding gender reform in Scotland (despite his MSPs stance), while looking for Sunak to "work with" Starmer and Labour in order to make the best of the Brexit shambles and blindside the ERG? Maybe just me - I will look out my tinfoil hat.......................... Edited January 16 by Leith Green 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 2 hours ago, Bad Wolf said: As I'm trying to eradicate the c word from my vocabulary I have literally nothing to say about Starmy. I'll say it for you then. He’s a Conservative; an absolute Conservative. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 18 hours ago, Granny Danger said: So tuition fees will stay in England under Starmer. It’s an interesting strategy, vote for us as we’re not going to do any of the things we promised. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/keir-starmer-indicates-he-will-ditch-leadership-pledge-to-scrap-tuition-fees_uk_63c3b84de4b0cbfd55f3c7e3 Didn't that tube Jedi tell us Labour would bin those? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 Anyone else think that if this lady was leader, people might begin to take Labour seriously? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 If I were a SLab MP or MSP I'd seriously be considering defecting to the SNP - siding with the Tories on GRR is just criminal. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StellarHibee Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 8 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: If I were a SLab MP or MSP I'd seriously be considering defecting to the SNP - siding with the Tories on GRR is just criminal. Any SLAB MPs and MSPs with any scruples have long since defected. What remains are a group of spineless simpletons who will do exactly what they're told to do by head office. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sophia Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 5 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: If I were a SLab MP or MSP I'd seriously be considering defecting to the SNP - siding with the Tories on GRR is just criminal. That's all very well but we're only talking about Jackie Baillie, Daniel Johnson and Ian Murray who could do that and not forfeit their post. What a sorry bunch. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpetmonster Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 27 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said: Anyone else think that if this lady was leader, people might begin to take Labour seriously? Ish. If I lived in England and she was leader I’d consider voting for them rather than just spoiling my paper. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 hour ago, ICTJohnboy said: Anyone else think that if this lady was leader, people might begin to take Labour seriously? What do you think Labour’s position on a second IndyRef would be if she was leader? Or whether they supported the Tories on striking down legislation in the devolved Scottish Parliament? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StellarHibee Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 minute ago, Granny Danger said: What do you think Labour’s position on a second IndyRef would be if she was leader? Or whether they supported the Tories on striking down legislation in the devolved Scottish Parliament? It would be entirely the same. Right now she has the privilege of talking as someone who isn't party leader. But should she find herself in that position, she will fall right into line. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 1 minute ago, StellarHibee said: It would be entirely the same. Right now she has the privilege of talking as someone who isn't party leader. But should she find herself in that position, she will fall right into line. Very much my point. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 14 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: What do you think Labour’s position on a second IndyRef would be if she was leader? Or whether they supported the Tories on striking down legislation in the devolved Scottish Parliament? I believe she could very well be sympathetic to both, but we'll never know as long as Starmer is in charge. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamthebam Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 2 hours ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: If I were a SLab MP or MSP I'd seriously be considering defecting to the SNP - siding with the Tories on GRR is just criminal. Their Unionism is above any socialist feelings. Which is what has been killing Scottish Labour for a decade or more. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StellarHibee Posted January 16 Share Posted January 16 23 minutes ago, tamthebam said: Their Unionism is above any socialist feelings. Which is what has been killing Scottish Labour for a decade or more. Except it can hardly be called "Unionism" these days. They know what it has become and seem perfectly fine with it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.