The Moonster Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 3 minutes ago, BullyWee Craig said: "On balance of probability" yeah that's so much better isn't it. As I said, you're a fucking idiot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zanetti Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 7 minutes ago, BullyWee Craig said: Would you be happy with one of your family members having their entire life ruined based on nothing but probability? Wouldn't you want a jury of their peers to decide? Well that's what goodie wanted and didn't get. What if this happened to your sister or wife? Would you be comfortable with her rapist being in a job where he represents an entire community, and is a role model to many including young boys, despite having never shown any remorse? Or would you use this same line? "I'm sorry you THINK you were raped, but unless a jury agrees I'm afraid we just don't know". It's actually frightening that you're still defending him at this point. I'm embarrassed for you. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 9 minutes ago, BullyWee Craig said: "On balance of probability" yeah that's so much better isn't it. You'd take it if you were taking your insurance company to court. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Burton Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 What's funny is I suggested an official vote on the owners forum and twitter, interestingly it was only those who didn't want Goodie back that said it shouldn't be fans decision. Well they aren't saying that now.So your post about the Glasgow Branch backed by 250 members is basically bollocks?What's likely happened in reality is a dozen or so fans and the sponsor have pressurised the board into signing him. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde85 Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 What sponsor is it out of curiosity? I agree the board is spineless it it’s been dictated to them by one person and a handful of supporters! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oneteaminglasgow Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 47 minutes ago, BullyWee Craig said: it's the basis for him being called a rapist and this whole circus. Just as a wee side note, no it isn’t. The basis for him being called a rapist is the rape which he committed. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John MacLean Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 1 hour ago, 19QOS19 said: You disagree with a person not wanting to fund a rapist's wages? Interesting. He was found guilty you complete weapon. I'm coming round to the idea of posting the Civil Judgement in reply to every post along the lines of, "ach, he wasn't found guilty in a criminal court". There really is now hope for anyone who reads that judgement and doesn't agree with its', and subsequent appeal, judgement. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salute Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 3 hours ago, BullyWee Craig said: Massive well done to the board for listening to the majority of fans and sponsors who backed this move to bring Goodie home. The easiest decision would have been to turn our backs on him but that's not the Clyde way. This man has saved our club and those who celebrated his goals but now cower in fear over headlines should hang their heads in shame. We got our legend back You and your like are the idiots who should hang your head in shame. You are a fkn disgrace. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John MacLean Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 1 hour ago, BullyWee Craig said: To be called a rapist you have to be found guilty by a jury of your peers in a criminal court, he wasn't. You can't be found guilty in a civil court you weapon. Maybe before having an opinion on something, try and understand the law. In civil court it basically comes down to 1 judge saying "meh probably happened", that's it. Not beyond believable doubt, not guilty, not a jury. So on nothing more than "meh probably" people are willing to ruin someone's life, he's also not the only person this has happened to. Another man who found "not proven" in a criminal court, only to have a civil court say he was liable. Well that's a great justice system, liable for something which is not proven. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/search-judgments/judgment?id=d22e28a7-8980-69d2-b500-ff0000d74aa7 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
salute Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 2 hours ago, BullyWee Craig said: Just checking, should our landlord dictate our transfer policy? I wish you would just shut the F up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDuffman Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 2 hours ago, CM. said: Genuinely interested and not looking for a debate/argument but what made you talk yourself into going back this year timing wise? I have a couple of mates (not Clyde fans) who had been regular attenders at their teams games for years but fell out of love with it (still supported their teams obviously, just didn't go to games anymore) however when games went behind closed doors due to covid it made them realise that when things went back to normal they couldn't wait to get back to games as you never know when the last time you are able to watch your team could be. Basically similar reasons for me. Had missed going to the games. Especially after lockdown & not getting out to various other things I'd also been missing. Figured Goodwillie was there whether I turn up or not. Just persuaded myself that I was the one that was being punished. Kind of crazy thinking looking back on it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullyWee Craig Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 41 minutes ago, Jack Burton said: So your post about the Glasgow Branch backed by 250 members is basically bollocks? What's likely happened in reality is a dozen or so fans and the sponsor have pressurised the board into signing him. Couldn't be more wrong. Over 50 people alone on the owners forum voted for his return. Zero people in the Glasgow branch group on FB have said they are against it. Everyone I've spoke to are in favour. The minority is Pie & Bovril, not the fans at games still singing his name, not the owners forums and not GB. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 3 hours ago, BullyWee Craig said: Massive well done to the board for listening to the majority of fans and sponsors who backed this move to bring Goodie home. The easiest decision would have been to turn our backs on him but that's not the Clyde way. This man has saved our club and those who celebrated his goals but now cower in fear over headlines should hang their heads in shame. We got our legend back Great signing for Clyde. Wish ICT had signed him instead, would have got us promoted!! Don't believe anyone should be permanently cancelled, especially when not guilty in a criminal court. Hats off to Clyde, am sure they will reap the benefits. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Burton Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 Couldn't be more wrong. Over 50 people alone on the owners forum voted for his return. Zero people in the Glasgow branch group on FB have said they are against it. Everyone I've spoke to are in favour. The minority is Pie & Bovril, not the fans at games still singing his name, not the owners forums and not GB. 50 out of 400 owners is nowhere near a majority.I'm on the Glasgow Branch Facebook page and there will be plenty others on it against it too.Everyone I've spoken to is against it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLClyde Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 54 out of 96 votes on the owners forum, 36 against and 6 undecided on that vote. 96 out of 404 owners that voted anyway. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullyWee Craig Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 4 minutes ago, Jack Burton said: 50 out of 400 owners is nowhere near a majority. I'm on the Glasgow Branch Facebook page and there will be plenty others on it against it too. Everyone I've spoken to is against it. Then you should have called for an owners vote, but you didn't and now we're suppose to assume how many were or against it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 Functioning adults. Actual functioning adults 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottsdad Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 Various news outlets label him as a rapist, including the BBC. Why? Because he cannot sue these organisations for defamation. They are perfectly within their right to label him as such because of this judgement. If he didn't like it, he could have appealed the judgement. Much as the zoomers infesting this place might dislike it, he can be called a rapist. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullyWee Craig Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 48 minutes ago, oneteaminglasgow said: Just as a wee side note, no it isn’t. The basis for him being called a rapist is the rape which he That's an even worse take, so it's not even the civil case you base it on, just the accusation then? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Clyde FC Posted March 2, 2022 Share Posted March 2, 2022 5 minutes ago, BullyWee Craig said: Couldn't be more wrong. Over 50 people alone on the owners forum voted for his return. Zero people in the Glasgow branch group on FB have said they are against it. Everyone I've spoke to are in favour. The minority is Pie & Bovril, not the fans at games still singing his name, not the owners forums and not GB. 56 out of 404 is not a majority. All 50 members of a sub group is only that, as sub group. Some of the p***ks on the OS are living in the past and have little regard for Clyde in the future. Did The GB, fans living outside Scotland and smart arses saying it will blow over by the weekend predict that our landlord would go public with their views and potentially reviewing our rental agreement? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.