Peterhead vs Clyde

[As Easterly as it gets!]

2 hours ago, clyde_darren said:

Is this a serious question? How would a decision be appealed and then potentially overturned without video footage?

It is a serious question. I may be a little out of touch as to the availability of footage at every ground. I honestly dont know if every club has, or has to have the game covered.

You tell me how decisions used to be appealed when there was no footage. 

[peternapper]

See Goodwillies appeal was turned down, no word if they looked into Loves blatant simulation efforts. 

[blueone]

2 hours ago, peternapper said:

See Goodwillies appeal was turned down.

Can't argue with that. Looking at the highlights on the Clyde website you can't even say it was 50-50 especially in slow motion.

Wouldn't say it was deliberate but clearly after the ball was played and with his arms raised.

Straight red all day. Surprised Clyde thought they could win an appeal.

[TheBigGuy]

3 minutes ago, blueone said:

Can't argue with that. Looking at the highlights on the Clyde website you can't even say it was 50-50 especially in slow motion.

Wouldn't say it was deliberate but clearly after the ball was played and with his arms raised.

Straight red all day. Surprised Clyde thought they could win an appeal.

After seeing the replay I'm suprised what Danny saw defendable in that. 

A poor mis-judgement I would conclude by our number nine!

[Blootoon87]

Peterhead have their highlights up now, it's a definite red.