vikingTON

How can a company be non-charitable and not-for-profit: do the books balance precisely or something? Of course, that takes into account the audit fees to do this company's books as well. Sure, all of the surplus will go to others - once Maddie has been found or the case resolved: which it won't be. Hence the Doctor has created the equivalent of a pyramid scheme to fund his defence case. These people really play the media well.

Statistically speaking, they ought to be suspects, but can't be convicted on statistics obviously. My view is they've done it accidentally and have tried to cover it up. , ie she fell and banged her head while they were gone, died and they've hidden the body to stop conviction for neglect. For some reason i find that most plausible, and I hope its the case rather than Gerry being a callous murderer.

Gerry isn't out of the woods yet, is he?

I can't believe its taken 4 months for the blatantly obvious to happen.

Hmm, statistically the most likely killer in murder cases is a friend or close family member, I believe. It wasn't her, she's just covering up Gerry's work.

What ever Happened to Corey Haim? - The Thrills I can't get it out of my head now...

Didn't even notice that. The problem with smart jokes is that only the smart get it.

I think Kate is buckling under the pressure of covering for Gerry's lies. Isn't it fun playing Columbo.

Still relevant no? They are either guilty of negligence or are guilty of murder/manslaughter.

Caroline, Yes - Kaiser Chiefs

The Finnish league is just fecked up this season. Bit like Norway last season - its cramped between the top and the bottom: not helped by the disproportionate amount of away wins.

Learn your lesson - Morton and gambling should never be mixed. Backing against morton is a far better option.

By the evil, Hitler-like Portugese polis of course.

The Angry Mob - Kaiser Chiefs

Old Yellow Bricks - Arctic Monkeys

Brianstorm - Arctic monkeys Next person who calls it "Brainstorm" will face the axe in their face.

Just clearing it up.

Firstly, I don't think they deserve it. They should, however, have social services onto them for being negligent with their child in the first place, IMO. Secondly, as much as it may be taboo, the reality shows that family members are frequently the perpetrators in homicides. It may not be palatable, but no stone can, or should, be left unturned.

Round of applause for that speech. Hits nail right on head.

Happy birthday y'all. I'd play The View for Latino Lover, but I think he detests them.

Well let's see: it was a BBC story in your clickster, no? The BBC have been accusing the portugese police of incompetence. As have some on this forum.

No I wouldn't, because I believe the Portugese police are competent, unlike some others, who are the "you" I was referring to. Why would i use "we" if I disagree with them? That'd be a bit odd, no?

You used "us", so I used "you". Two pural terms. Or shall we simply resort to pedantic guerilla tactics?

I'll forgive you for not recognising the use of the "you plural" pronoun. Easy mistake to make.

Did I say I was quoting you personally?