Jump to content

The Master

Gold Members
  • Posts

    13,001
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    12

Posts posted by The Master

  1. 14 hours ago, Dundee-FC92 said:

    We'd beable to pay the 66K off alone with the Sky money from the live game from Dens next Sunday.

     

    There’s no “Sky money” for next week’s game. 

    The TV money goes into a central pot and is paid to all 42 SPFL clubs as part of the prize money. 

  2. 3 minutes ago, capt_oats said:

    It's not if there's a single postponement - it's triggered if there's a single waterlogged postponement. The DFC statement is quite clear about that.

    If you fix your drainage then you're fine. You can postpone games for other reasons if you like.

    Well, no, fixed drainage doesn't mean the pitch will never be waterlogged. There's many examples down the years of clubs with (ostensibly) adequate drainage having waterlogged pitches due to extreme weather. 

    The fact we could still be punished even if the pitch and drainage are brought up to SPFL standards doesn't seem right. 

    3 minutes ago, capt_oats said:

    Genuine question, as I don't know the answer, how many other top flight clubs had a league postponements this season because of waterlogged pitches?

    Ross County v Hibs was postponed just before Christmas for a waterlogged pitch.

  3. 1 hour ago, Arch Stanton said:

    I'm sure if any other clubs have 5 postponements in the same season then they will be dealt with in the same way.

    At what point do this season's postponement become irrelevant?

    If (and I appreciate it's a big 'if') we completely overhaul our pitch and have it verified that the drainage is up to the standard required by the rules, will we still be forced to pay the suspended fine if a severe storm hits the day before a game and completely swamps the pitch?

    In such a scenario, why would we be any different to, say, Ross County, who had a game postponed this season because of a waterlogged pitch?

  4. 21 minutes ago, Busta Nut said:

    I see it now, though I am not sure how much of an "error" that will be. They might just use the Cricket channel to show it (504 on my box)

    I’m not sure why, though.

    The only other football they have that day is an EPL game at 4.30, and a WSL game at 6.45. There’s no EFL play-off games scheduled for that day either.

    It is also down on their own website as being on the Football channel.

  5. 3 hours ago, Molotov said:

    Nah. Not really. I just would rather that the league had got the fixtures scheduled fairly for St Mirren as we should not be playing Celtic away for the third time and Rangers at home for the third. It’s bollox.

    But the alternative was that we played Celtic away for a third time and Rangers at home for a third time.

    Something had to give. 

  6. Either Sky should have insurance against postponed fixtures, or the SPFL should have insurance against Sky billing them for postponed fixtures. 

    Postponement of a televised fixture is precisely the sort of "low likelihood, high impact" event that insurance is designed for. 

×
×
  • Create New...