Jump to content

Raith_Raver

Gold Members
  • Posts

    2,578
  • Joined

Posts posted by Raith_Raver

  1. 12 minutes ago, D'Jaffo said:


    Yes bigger.

    Parrots don't talk with intelligence, there's nothing bigger about the Ayrshire derby except the boasting. Apart from the Fife towns being bigger, the Ayrshire derby is a one sided affair with Ayr winning less than half the number of games Killie won, compared to Dunfermline Rovers where its not far off half and half.

  2. 31 minutes ago, craigkillie said:


    There have already been 2 games shown from East End Park this season (including a Fife derby), so it couldn't be on TV. Even a much bigger game like the Ayrshire derby was only on TV for 2 out of the 4 matches this season for that very reason.

    Bigger? Kirkcaldy and Dunfermline have bigger populations than either Ayr or Kilmarnock. I'm talking from years of irritated observation that the Ayrshire derby is a darling fixture of the West coast media, especially the BBC ("you can be sure we'll cover every kick") "Scotland".

  3. 6 minutes ago, R.R.FC said:

    I don’t think that’s fair, I think there has been a very clear change in our style of play from Partick Thistle at home. We have went a lot more direct. We have still seen some nice passages of play in the opponents half but we aren’t seeing the same slow, patient build up play we did last season and for the first half of this season. How much of that was enforced by personnel available and how much was down to instruction and change of plan by McGlynn is obviously up for debate but with playing two up front we have definitely been trying to hit the strikers much quicker.

    I agree that McGlynn has changed things, what I said is that I don't think he has found an effective way to counteract high pressing tactics. Some teams can take advantage and expose the weaknesses of high press, we've been unable to do so. I don't think there will be any doubt about how Dunfermline will approach this game, just as QOS did on Sunday, when we were on the back foot until we changed from the two up front.

  4. I think the majority of us agree that most teams have decided the most effective way to play us is the hundred mile an hour high pressing game, and Dunfermline have done this in our previous three fixtures. What gets me is that McGlynn hasn't figured out a way to counter this tactic, other than to hope we can ride it out and hope opponents run out of steam later in the game.

  5. 2 hours ago, TxRover said:

    ....In the end, a somewhat tired Rovers struggle mightily, but somehow make it 2-2 at full time.

    After the match on Sunday McGlynn said he wouldn't be giving the players the day off (yesterday) because of the importance of Wednesday's match, so he doesn't think that fatigue will be a factor - maybe if there had been extra time.

  6. 3 hours ago, Cardle is Magic said:

    On the actual game it’s must win for us IMO to avoid bottom two but I think it will be low or no scoring draw.

     

    It's more or less a must win for us both; a draw would give us a slim chance but would be almost certainly bottom two for you. i'm not optimistic, Dunfermline have learned like every other team in the league that we can't match high pressing high tempo tactics that give us no time on the ball. That said, if it's still even after an hour when the pace inevitably drops I think we'll win, just like Sunday.

  7. 1 hour ago, Ro Sham Bo said:

    The fact Spencer is constantly an unused sub definitely points at him still being a good bit from full fitness. 

    Unfortunately doesn't look like we've shifted much tickets for this which is no doubt due to the final at the weekend. 

    Even if he was ready his lack of match fitness would rule him out of a game of this importance, unless he came on late if we were out of sight.

    I'm not contributing to their coffers either this time, the townies didnt much bother to come to the games at Stark's.

     

×
×
  • Create New...