wulliamwallace

50,000 hate filled fans singing about killing catholic's is ok is it ? Points deduction and large fine called for i think ? Can you pay the fine though ? As for the reply's i didn't expect anything less from zombie fans

Every club has a few idiots, mine has a good share of them ( mostly stupid wee boys and men who cant grow up) but your deed club had 50,000 belting out hate filled anthems one of them about being up to your knees in F*** blood, not a few folk but the whole stadium, even though you lot have been told that is just one of the songs your not allowed to sing. Keep making excuses, there is plenty of videos being leaked from the game which shows more unsavoury acts from your scummy fans.

This is from another blog, very interesting take on things that happened a few days ago. Spending like the Borgias? Time to move on. Conspiracy to subvert the rules? We have a problem..... So much happened yesterday, I’ll be as brief as possible: New Rangers sent their counsel to the Court of Session to protest Charles Green’s contract with the club, stating it should pay legal expenses, now crystallising ahead of his forthcoming criminal trial. In opposing Green, James Wolffe QC raised various objections, but as is often the case when people speak on behalf of New Rangers, included an arbitrary insistence that New Rangers operated the same club as the now liquidated Rangers. Green’s QC, Jonathan Brown, put his pit boots on before stating his client’s case, but tantalisingly, before lunch informed the court that he would return to the same club/new club debate later. And didn’t he. Brown explained that Sevco Scotland purchased the assets of Old Rangers, not the club itself, with poetic prose adding: “The team are paid by Sevco, plat at a ground owned by Secvo, are trained by a manager who is employed by Sevco and fans buy tickets from Sevco. That is the business that is being carried on.” Adding that Old Rangers were “a collection of assets”, “What if the players were sold to one person and Ibrox to antoher, where is the ‘club’ then?” I had to look away from court reporter, James Dolman’s Twitter feed at this point. It was like watching an acquaintance being humiliated. Not something you want to see. Lord Doherty will determine if New Rangers should pay Green’s costs in due course, but this will be soon, as Jonathan Brown noted, “the rainy day has arrived”. This next bit is really important: Soon after court ended, Dave King was out with a rambling statement on the New Rangers website. If it was designed to play to the galleries, it hit the spot. If it was designed to influence what happens to his club, or how others will regard his input, it was surely an horrendous mistake. It was a hard day to be chairman of Rangers International FC. The court hearing only happened because the club objected to its contract with Green, so the unedifying episode could easily have been avoided. Despite this, sometimes you have to shut your mouth. Sure, some New Rangers fans love a bit of grandstanding, but you know what yesterday’s statement will achieve. If the objective of the statement was to convince other Scottish clubs not to consider disciplinary action against Sir David Murray, or Old Rangers, for their actions, it was an almighty miscalculation. Threats seldom work. This one is unlikely to curry favour: “If the history of our Club comes under attack we will deal with it in the strongest manner possible and will hold to account those persons who have acted against their fiduciary responsibilities to their own clubs and to Scottish football.” In short: Don’t threaten clubs you are trying to influence. Don’t grandstand to your own fans if you are trying to influence other clubs. Keep a poker face. Keep your mouth shut, even if it means taking grief from your fans for the lack of public reaction. King’s statement also addressed the sporting advantage issue from what we now know was an unlawfully operated tax scheme. While the EBT scheme saved tens of millions of pounds, and King earlier intimated this did provide a sporting advantage, yesterday he insisted the advantage was financial, that the shareholders were “committed to providing funding to the club” and would have done so, if required. Here’s the thing, in 2012 another King statement revealed, “I have made a claim of £20m on the basis of non-disclosure by the then chairman, David Murray, of Rangers true financial position as far back as 2000.” That commitment to further shareholder funding seems predicated on some controversial information. According to King, of course. Controversial enough to launch a £20m claim, but not to inhibit investment. For the war-chest hunters among you, if you read this article covering King’s 2012 statement, you’ll find a strong clue. http://news.stv.tv/…/299994-rangers-director-plans-to-sue-…/ One other quick but important point: Some media are attempting to portray questions of sporting advantage as Old Rangers being punished for spending money they could afford, a travesty, as so many other clubs have done likewise. This must surely be a deliberate attempt to misunderstand the issue and manipulate the debate. No one suggests Old Rangers should be punished for spending money they could not afford. The questions are straightforward: Did Old Rangers break tax law, break SFA rules and break SPL rules, when contracting football players? Did they disclose matters openly with authorities (in other words, inadvertently make mistakes), or did they conspire to subvert the rules by hiding incriminating information? Spending like the Borgias? Time to move on. Conspiracy to subvert the rules? We have a problem. Don’t be distracted by potential ramifications to these questions, they are irrelevant for now. We should consider no more than did they break all of the above rules, should any the rule breaking be interpreted as an oversight, or does evidence of conspiracy to subvert the rules exist?

I asked earlier on who owns the title deeds ? No one has mentioned greens court case where this was questioned the same day as the ebt news ? If green only bought the assets like he claims where does this leave the cheats ?

On a serious note who owns the title deeds ? or is it the assets ? What a fkn shambles of a rotten deed cheating club, expel the cheats

They people who have been cheated here are the fans, the fans of all the teams who payed their hard earned cash year after year to go and watch their beloved club while the cheats bought some of the best players in Britain. Oldco should have the tainted titles stripped and removed from the records, they cheated full stop, newco should be expelled from the game for bringing it in to disrepute and playing while insolvent and the SFA should resign, the fkn lot of them as they are just as corrupt, Ogilvie, Reagan and Doncaster should walk right now. Our game needs an overhaul starting from the top. Lets do it without the fkn cheats " for the good of Scottish football"

The two guys who set this whole saga up are called " Green & Whyte "

I'm doing good ta,i don't come on here that much tbh. Im more on the SPL forum where the big boys are. I actually think mcjobby is a total dick which makes his wealth from rangers and the seethe he has unleashed even more funny. Were going through all the emotions too you know, laughter, more laughter, bit of pitty, realization you fkn deserve it, more laughter. Hope your doing well life's too short

PS4: WulliamWallace Fifa 15 COD AW GTA V Batman A few others... Soon: Need for Speed Star Wars

Ill be honest here i actually hated this game after it getting good reviews from my mates and websites i gave it a go. I didnt get into the sneaking around side of it and the zombie thing is getting a bit boring. Too much sneaking for my liking and not in a good way.

Bennet yet again going on about the Phil mcjobby chap, talk about obsessed Give the guy a break Bennet he has made good money from this whole shambolic comedy show

Who was that p***k ? the guy from corrie? craig ? What a total fanny, jumping around like a diva stealing the ingredients and ordering that guy from blue peter around and he was fkn clueless didnt even know how to make a moose ? The guy could'nt cook for a start, im glad hes gone.

First two episodes were rubbish, it seems to be getting better now though

fkn joke of a deid club lol

Third

Spunked over 70 million quid and still skint still can't get into premier league still making a total cnut of themselves still knuckle dragging mutant zombies still fkn deed still a laughing stock still giving everyone else laughs on a daily basis what a fkn shambles of a deed club GIRFUY

East Kilbride today. As funny as this is, i do feel sorry for the poor b*****ds that are losing their jobs. Ashley clearly doesn't give a f**k.

Celtic - new balance Sevco - nae balance

It will be interesting to see how some possible legal issues & restrictions affect King & co should they get positions on the board, Will HMRC take action & will the SFA also take action ? What will Ashley's take on this be ? It is amusing that the guys who stood by and killed off rangers are now the saviours of sevco, even though they are not fit & proper one of them being a convicted fraudster & members of the old board who let their club die ?

A good 1st episode for season 3, i love this program

Hurting badly ^ I bet you wish your team could one day have the chance to play in Europe

wulliamwallace, on 02 Feb 2015 - 13:16, said: your reply- Really? Somebody should tell Alan Brazil he was never abused it was just a made up story. I hope Jim Torbett sues the authorities for all they have for locking him up based on made up stories I admitted i got it wrong about the kid being hurt and i also said the guy who did it should go to jail, i also said the likes of you bring up child abuse to score points and in your reply ^ you used child abuse to score points.I also heard a few songs at the game which was mocking child abuse funny how you never mentioned them being sung ? Im not going to carry on the tit for tat pish with you, its not why i come on here, i can see through you and you have already come across as a seething bigot and a racist so i dont expect anything else, you are a liar and a fraud. This is supposed to be a football forum where we talk about football and in this topic about sevco and their admin/ liquidation can we please keep it to that and not whataboutry.

This is what no8 and his fellow bears do, they talk nonsense and give it a lot of whatboutrey tit for tat pish, "but they did this and they did that" hoping that the mods get fed up and close the thread, deflection and we are ra peepil / zombies at its best / worst. Back to the football:- Ashley has this shambles of a club sewn up, whos paying the 5 loanee's wages and is it coming out of his loan ? Will the sfa do anything about Ashley running 2 clubs and should sevco be fined & deducted points for running while insolvent ?