Jump to content

topcat(The most tip top)

Gold Members
  • Posts

    17,677
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by topcat(The most tip top)

  1. 11 hours ago, 54_and_counting said:

    As much as you want to believe, it actually won't

    Bear*  in mind that your opinion on a situation almost certainly won’t accurately reflect all Rangers fans (and possibly not even Rangers fans in general))

     

     

     

     

    * No pun originally intended but I’m pleased with it nonetheless 

  2. 24 minutes ago, GordonS said:

    Yes. Barca's cap is €200 million, vastly lower than Real Madrid's. They're currently at about €400 million, meaning they can only sign players if they offload an existing player, and they can only pay the incoming player 25% of the what the outgoing player was on. 

    Presumably once they move back into the new camp nou ("camp nou nou"?) their turnover will rise and so will their cap

  3. 8 minutes ago, dirty dingus said:

    Yes Sibbick (checked Google)reminded me of Brian Reid back in the day the way he strolled about.

    He's only an inch taller than Rowles

    Then again if you'd written "the black centre half"  instead of "the big centre half" it would have been less ambiguous but far more awkward

    So it's probably for the best

  4. 1 hour ago, SEETHING said:

    Never in doubt. Not for a fraction of a split-second were the Good Guys (Hearts) in danger of anything other than a comfortable victory.

    What an embarrassment Morton are. Chucking themselves to the floor at every opportunity, praying for throw-ins to fling aimlessly towards their cast of lumbering oafs in the box. Hopefully they can be retrospectively ejected from the Scottish Cup for sullying it with their odious presence. DELIGHTED that I can once again forget that they exist.

    Careful now 

  5.   

    1 hour ago, SEETHING said:

    For the record, I hope he's out. :lol: Hubris aside, the prospect of Toby Sibbick starting in defence for Hertz vs any competent striker gives me the fear.

    If Hearts go with the same team that faced Celtic, with Gordon in for Clark and Tait in for Nieuwenhof, I'd be happy. 

     

     

     

    Oakley and Sibbick were briefly at AFC Wimbledon together in 2017 

    Oakley left for Inverness not long after Sibbick moved up from Wimbledon's U18s. They didn't play together but they did sit on the same subs bench

  6. On 06/03/2024 at 19:00, Sortmeout said:

    I’ve said this a few times but this thread is further proof that Celtic fans will always have that inferiority complex when it comes to Rangers.

    Anything other than winning every single domestic game or domestic trophy clearly leaves them feeling second best to Rangers, despite the whole death/Newco scenario. 

     

    On 06/03/2024 at 19:17, Greenlantern said:

    If you’re seeking proof of an inferiority complex, look no further than a Rangers club statement. 

    These aren't mutually exclusive propositions

    I'm not a qualified ethnosociologist but given that Rangers and Celtic are generally draped in Irish Culture from Shamrocks to Orange shirts to folk tunes it's probably possible to link this collective insecurity down to the sense of not quite belonging that can happen even in Nth generation immigrant communities

    Aberdeen might be having a shit season at the moment but at least they know they're Aberdonians. 

     

     

  7. 9 minutes ago, eez-eh said:

    Pretty sure it’s averaged out over a few years anyway? It’s not like one bad season means you’re in the shit.

    I’m sure Everton fans will be all over it though with their whole innocent victims thing.

    It is averaged out but it’s not as if they’ve been anywhere near breaking even up to now

    https://www.chelseafc.com/en/news/article/chelsea-fc-2021-22-financial-results#:~:text=The above contributed to the,loss of £121.3 million.

  8. 1 hour ago, Salvo Montalbano said:

    Why? It says in the post that Chelsea lost 90.1 million - that will be well within the sustainability margins. For all Chelsea's crazy spending, they always manage to sell off academy graduates for decent money, and those players aren't amortised in the same way signings are so they make decent "profits" on them as far as the books go. Amortising the big spends over 7, 8 or even 9 years will also help and now the PL have banned that, nobody else can do it. The issue they'll have will be in a few years if they can't sell any more academy graduates or they can't recoup any of the fees they've laid out on the likes of Caicedo, Fernandez, etc.

    Amortising the spend on transfers will be why it’s only £90m for one year

    however not all the loss will actually count for profit and sustainability purposes. Losses that are attributed things like infrastructure investment and running the women’s team can be ignored so their effective loss for P&S will be smaller

    Everton’s unadjusted numbers were on a similar scale to Chelsea’s for multiple years 

    So this season alone probably doesn’t land them in trouble but they lost money in previous years so it leaves them in a very difficult situation with little room to manoeuvre and a bunch of players nobody els wants to sign, commanding wages nobody else wants to pay  

  9. 34 minutes ago, Dons_1988 said:

    Hibs got it once for porteous I think too. It’s a very  selective process 

    I was looking to see whether we'd appealed against the VAR Driven upgrade of Cochrane's yellow to a red in last May's home game against Celtic and apparently we didn't partly because we'd just seen Aberdeen punished for a "Frivolous appeal" on behalf of Graeme Shinnie from a game against Ross county

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/65349430

    It's at 1:20  in this highlights package

     

×
×
  • Create New...