Burma

Where have I claimed that the "Tories run BT" please be very specific.

Where have I said that the "Tories run the NO campaign" please be very specific.

Where did I say that you said that. You certainly asserted that position when you said:

See this is the difficulty in engaging with you and Im not sure uf you do it on purpose or not. You constsntly alter the parameters of the debate without cause to do so or reference to the previous discussion. It can often feel like tslking to two entirely different people. You were asked why something was "important" and you responded that it was important to you because others deny it. You were asked if that was the only reason it was important to which you respomd that it is now not important. Pick a lane.

No you havent. You have pointed to donations and creative input. This is not the same as providing evidence that the SNP control the ENTIRE YES campaign, which someone else pointed out was a nonsense statement.

No im asking you if you agree with HB that the SNP are running the entire YES campaign and anyone who is not affiliated to the SNP has no input. Do you agree with him or not?

Its only inportant to you because others are denying it? Really?

Is it as made up as your assertion that the SNP run the entire YES campaign?

Well you were responding to a statement I made to H_B's clearly ludicrous position. I havent read Blackleys comments nor do I care. Do you agree with H_B's position that the SNP control YES?

When I called it a leap I admit I was doing the Half_Baked one a kindness.

Why does it matter?

Really lets have another look. No. Thats exactly what he said.

Why is it so important to you that people "admit" it? Does it matter that the SNP are the major partner in the YES campaign amy more than the Tories are the major partner in the NO campaign?

To go from "some unknown unnamed person employed by the SNP designed a poster and a leaflet" to "the SNP are running the entire YES campaign and no one who is not affiliated to them has the slightest input" is a leap.

Bit of a leap. Still. Who cares?

Why does it matter?

If only there was some online resource that could help you with reconciling marriage and your caber tossing needs.

You do much tossing?

And haggis and sporrans and porridge and brigadoon and rob roy and bonnie prince charlie and shortbread and oor wullie and bannockburn and archie gemmill and bagpipes and thistles and kilts.

What was the question he was responding to?

This is what BetterTogether/NoThanks/NoBorders/UKOK/VoteNo are banking on.

Did Marr not present the polls as evidence that YES were losing and invite Salmond to comment or was it a completely unrelated question?

The problem with the 79 results being used as a marker for anything is that the referendum was so utterly corrupt and rigged that any attempt to extrapolate the actual result is probably meaningless.

Fair enough. Cant see much wrong with that logic.

What makes you say that? Not disagreeing and tbh with a combined population of significantly less than East Kilbride I doubt it will be pivotal in any way, especially when the actual vote on the day might be less than 10'000 turning out. Just curious as to how you came up with such a certain prediction.