Jump to content

The DA

Gold Members
  • Posts

    11,398
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by The DA

  1. Are we sure that the jury thought all of the women were lying? Is it not possible that they believed the evidence of at least some of the women but then decided that no crimes had been committed?
  2. Not as of 15 minutes ago. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-52011915
  3. That had nothing to do with coronavirus mate. They just want YOU to stay at home.
  4. Ashley's tanks heading home again. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-52011915
  5. Fair shout. I'll add a w**k to the to-do list.
  6. I'd love to go and do something productive with my day but every time I try, this thread grows by a dozen pages. Can everybody stop posting for a couple of hours?
  7. There'll be folk phoning 111 and asking how you cook an applepine.
  8. Do Morrison's not have a 'maximum 3 items' rule in place?
  9. Agreed. The judge is supposed to instruct the jury on when a 'not proven' verdict would be appropriate. But the study at https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-jury-research-fingings-large-mock-jury-study-2/pages/8/ suggests that the public doesn't understand the verdict very well and often uses it as a cop-out. Hence 'not guilty but don't do it again'.
  10. I didn't invent the 'not proven' verdict. If it meant the same as 'not guilty', it wouldn't need to exist.
  11. Effectively. The following puts it quite well https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/1992/has-a-verdict-of-not-proven-ever-had-a-different-effect-to-one-of-not-guilty
  12. Socially. Reputation. Future prospects.
  13. 'Not proven' has a stigma attached.
  14. But one of the charges was found to be 'not proven' rather than 'not guilty'.
  15. Totally agree from the second paragraph onward. Impact-wise, 'not guilty' and 'not proven' are the same but the latter has always been taken to mean 'we think you did it but the prosecution didn't prove their case' or 'not guilty and don't do it again'.
  16. Your post said the charges 'weren't proven either way'. Since 'not proven' has a very specific meaning in Scots Law, I merely clarified that only one of the charges was 'not proven'. He was found 'not guilty' of the others.
  17. Maybe not just your hands. Back seat of your car?
  18. He was found not guilty on all counts other than on an attempted rape where the case was 'not proven'.
  19. Wasn't the reason for all the more 'trivial' accusations because they weren't sure the more serious ones would stand up on their own?
  20. To be fair, neither is an oil-painting.
×
×
  • Create New...