MK Col
Gold Members-
Posts
55 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by MK Col
-
Huge attendances - checkTop 2 finish cash - checkChampions league gates - checkChampions league tv money - checkCup run attendances & tv money - checkMassive worldwide following (yeah right) - checkRich sugar daddy owners and hanger on - check Yet with all that, they still couldn't pay their bills, balance the books and play by the rules. So what's different about sevco? Kill them. Dead. Stone dead. Edit - sorry about formatting, damn iPad!
-
The meeting is scheduled for 11am. So by the time they've done the formalities of starting the session, you're looking at 11.30 before any real presentations are done. And theres a buffet lunch after the meeting. So if that's as late as say 2pm (and there will be some hungry chairmen by that point), then that's only a couple of hours to debate and vote on such a huge decision.
-
How much would these subscribers be expected to pay for a single product package? Sky and ESPN are able to sell a their packages on the draw of the EPL, and pad it put with SPL, La Liga etc, and while the subs are primarily paying for the EPL deal, the rest adds value to the subscriber. I subscribe to sky sports, partially out of habit, but don't subscribe to ESPN for the off chance my team is on, and they are only an extra £10 a month. sky currently cover most of my tv viewing football needs. Diluting to multiple suppliers each with their own pricing is not attractive. If SPLTV was say £5, and you got 1/2 million subscribers, you're looking at only £2,500,000 a month, and have to pay all the associated taxes and costs to run it. Would that be enough? even then, £5 a month for a single product that only runs 10 months of the year is relatively steep.