foreverarover

If Raith finish in the bottom half irrespective of what goes on with other issues we will be getting a new management team in.

I wouldn't be surprised with the opportunity of getting Ethan Ross, Sam Stanton and Ben Williamson it has spunked most of that money.

Well no disrespect but that will clearly will be his stance if it went to court. Ie "nothing has changed in his life in the 5 years of playing with Clyde, that raith can justify freezing him out" IMO We ir Raith will get screwed over big time.

Cumbernauld colts run age 5 upwards on the pitch, full lowland league team. They did have in the past Scotland woman's rugby but I don't know if that's still the case.

I'm sorry but unless it changed to NL trust for ownership, I've never heard anything other than the council owning the stadium. I've lived and worked in the nauld for 19 years. Sounds like absolute shite to me.

Hypocritical to say the least, the council were for the last 5 years happy to have him play, train, captain and even play with thier logo splattered over thier shirt. So the woman's team were quite happy to play for Clyde prior to January.

Correct

Correct but it's "beyond reasonable doubt" as opposed to "balance of probability" in a civil action.

Kilmarnock should be 2-0 up. Hopkin spouts some shite. What about the perfectly good goal that was disallowed.

Bring on Arnott and actually make some fucking use of this game.

Same dire forward line. Kilmarnock whatever raith rovers 0.

Agreed with you point. But.. She being a former director will know exactly the finances of the club, how its structured and where the money comes from. She will know fine well that the club unless Sim pays for it himself will not have the money just to pay him off and rip up a contract. She as a business woman will also know breaking up a contract with stuff such as weekly wages, appearance fees, scoring fees cannot take a few days and possibly months to sort out. She expects things to happen, right now which in the real world won't happen. She should have stated that "I am aware of the circumstances surrounding contract negotiations and await a resolution thst satisfies my opinion." rather than another rant.

Is there any evidence of this?

Confront the board, by doing what exactly. Raising thier voice to be heard and ignored like in December when the rumours spread. [emoji1787]

Plenty, utter tosh, mayby the odd one who was put in their place.

He is not lauded by young fans, given the captains armband as club representative if he was working on a building site. There is nothing to stop him working (disclosure excepting) in any other workplace.

Tbh Val needs to pipe down. It's not her club anymore, she has the woman's team named after her.

I would say the fact that each var camera would have to be set the same to enable the same angles etc they may be set permanently and just plugged in on requirement to a hard drive or similar. A tv gantry will change with the structure of a stadium. Var is I'd expect need to be consistent through each ground with the same camera angles on view to a referee. That's why we can't rely on TV cameras as a less important match may have less cameras in use.

I don't see why it wouldn't be permanently left there. It would make sense to have the cameras fitted on place at the exact positions at each ground that give the same angles. Just plug them in.

The board won't allow that. We need to win this to recoup the directors cash.

Well do as everyone else has done and go to the match thread. Jog on. Toodle pip.

Best result we can get. Don't trust us to finish 6th or 7th.

If you've nothing to add to the conversation it's best to say nothing.

That sounds far too low. I remember the season they sold tickets for the home shirt sponsorship. I'm sure the tickets came to £20k and that was year's ago.

Just f#ck off mate and stick to your own clubs thread