Jump to content

D Angelo Barksdale

Platinum Members
  • Posts

    16,175
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    91

Posts posted by D Angelo Barksdale

  1. Surprised at McSpreader here tbh. His posts are usually balanced and nuanced. We can all be guilty of a faux pas though.

    Tell you what, apologise to Cerebus and the rest of the board for being a complete roaster and we'll forget all about it.

     

  2. 11 minutes ago, Poet of the Macabre said:

    Hibs didn't want either Brewster or Crawford. One of the best strike partnerships Dunfermline has ever had.

    Jamie Mole is one of the worst players to have ever put on a Dunfermline shirt. Genuinely hopeless.

     

    That's not how I recall it. Crawford perhaps, but Hibs wanted to keep Brewster, Pars offered him more money.

  3. 1 hour ago, welshbairn said:

    Totally lost it. 

    I'd imagine he's forgotten about Lincoln and Kennedy. I think he'll resign within a month.

    *counsel

    President of the US and he can't even fucking spell.

    It's the beginning of the end, although it's probably going to get pretty messy.

  4. 13 hours ago, oaksoft said:

    I didnt answer your question because it was brainless.

    This is not about a rape clause. This is about a 2 child limit with a compassionate exception for rape victims.

    You have decided to take a compassionate exception amd warp it into a disgusting political football by renaming it a rape clause.

    You are wrong to do so IMO.

    You then compound your disgraceful action by not suggesting something better than that exemption clause.

    You've just described forcing a victim of rape to give up their right to anonymity in order to feed their children as 'compassionate' 

    Then calling another posters' objections to this as 'disgusting' and 'disgraceful'

    What an utter mess of a human being you are.

  5. 11 minutes ago, git-intae-thum said:

    Look on the brightside.

    By tying itself to the mahogany napper element the unionist cause has firmly nailed itself to a dead donkey.

    They are committing slow suicide.

    I agree. However, it's wildly irresponsible and dangerous. This is not going to end well. It's fine for jolly old Ruth to fire out a few tweets, there are plenty of mouth breathers out there who would be willing and able to take it further.

  6. 9 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said:

    Au contraire.  It was some diddy who raised this in the first place.  The bigger question is why you should get to aerated by it unless you're guilty.

    Hmm ok then. Kindly provide evidence that 'P&B likes the 'Ra'.

    1 hour ago, The_Kincardine said:

     What a sensible statement from La Davidson:

    roof.JPG.c9636f028498c3ede04d13a5f42b42a0.JPG

    Target audience found.

  7. 50 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said:

    Seemingly P&B likes The Ra and can't abide wee Ruth.

    Got any evidence for this gin soaked accusation ?

    Clearly Ruth has found her target audience in you and your ilk, happy to march along to her flute whistle politics.

  8. 10 minutes ago, Im_Rodger said:

     

    Best Scottish politician full stop.

    nic4.png.be19cc24752169d133d763fb8d94a33e.png

    10 minutes ago, Im_Rodger said:

    Since my favourite politician is homosexual I cannot be homophobic.

    That's not really how it works m9.

  9. Missed this last night but caught up on iPlayer today.

    That Tory plant in the audience :lol:

    The crowd heckling the Tory :lol:

    Cherry's performance 8)

    The Tories having to bring up cannon fodder from England cos they can't afford to expose Fluffy or Ruth, with the rest of the party up here being either gormless cretins or racist simpletons :lol:

    On ‎10‎/‎05‎/‎2017 at 23:58, Henderson to deliver ..... said:

    Merryn Somerset Webb to balance the arsehole side out.

    :whistle

  10. 27 minutes ago, Suspect Device said:

     

    Never voted Tory and doubt I ever will.

    Can't recall her ever backing Le Pen and she's right on the fact that the SNP are just cynically using the rape clause debate for politics when they have the power to do something about it. I understand why the SNP are doing it though. Their main fight is with the Tories and it's one way to show that they're still the nasty party.

    She's pretty much ignored the fact that other parties, charities, women's health groups have opposed it too.

    She's abdicating the Tories from responsibility and trying to claim the SNP are the unpleasant and cynical ones here for daring to oppose it.

     

×
×
  • Create New...