Jump to content

Dosser1886

Gold Members
  • Posts

    289
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dosser1886

  1. 1 hour ago, MurrayWell said:

    FWIW I voted for the first option where the Well Society keeps control. Not sure why anyone would jump two-footed into the unknown at this point. 

    While I don't think the Well Society is perfect, I do think they've recognised where needs to be improved. The whole "investment video and campaign" was around us being fan-owned, not selling the club. If someone wants to join in with that and invest then ideal. 

    I've also got absolutely no faith in Jim McMahon and Co., piss up and brewery spring to mind. 

    Would be nice to actually get the email so that you could vote. Never seem to get then from the WS and I put in a whole £10 a month how dare they..😅

  2. Probably a stupid point but I'm a WS member putting something like £10 a month, he haw really. Can we not have a bit of a campaign for existing members to up their payments given where we are and the potential risks of 3rd parties coming in. Appreciate how hard times are but even upping by a few quid would surely help a bit. May not be a game changer. As I said probably a stupid point but there you go.

  3. 1 hour ago, Swello said:

    The reason I know it is that one of our directors actually mentioned it during an AGM - he was basically using St Johnstone as an example of a club that make the most of the stadium to the point that it can subsidise the football side of things (I'm sure it was during a bit of chat about us getting a new stadium/Fir Park being a millstone).

    Another reason to move to Ravenscraig and corner the lurative post Holytown Crematorium market.

  4. 12 minutes ago, Well Fan said:

    But, I now believe, SK is sticking by LK in the hope his form picks up to past levels and he goes to The Euros. 

    So I'm guessing, this is more a loyalty showing towards Kelly, more than purely footballing reasons. 

     

    I think SK and the board are sticking by Kelly as they actually paid some money for him and he is one of our biggest earners this was all done with a view to punt him at a later date for a profit once he had been a stand out performer game after game and other teams were clamouring for his signature. That worked out well.

    Hard decision has finally to be made, keep playing him with that aim or cut our loses and do what is best for the club, and arguably him, and drop him

  5. 9 minutes ago, capt_oats said:

    so if it's correct that Killie are covering the guts of that plus performance related increases then us even going at half of that is probably more than I'd have expected tbqh.

    If the numbers mentioned are correct then that's bonkers behaviour from Kilmarnock or more accurately Bowie.

    Think the planets aligned a bit while he was with us but would have thought it would have been stupid, even in our present situation, to have done something similar even if we were in a position to.

×
×
  • Create New...