Swifty
-
Posts
74 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Swifty
-
-
2 hours ago, FuzzyBear said:
The Rose should have been out of sight at half time but Dalkeith deserved it for their 2nd half efforts.
Imagine if it had been on astro.....
3 -
2 hours ago, Mainly Drinking Bovril said:
Some teams like to play the game and others like to "play the game".
No evidence required at this level. Mention Covid-19 and the game is off.
Wrong. Evidence IS required.
2 -
12 hours ago, Casey Jones said:
Aye - but maybe Penicuik lost the league today at home today
0 -
Missed the game through covid so a wee write up will be good.
1 -
22 hours ago, cowdenbeath said:
There are houses quite close at the back of one of the goals.
Suppose when folk moved into them they would expect some noise from the football pitch but not for a team with spectators to take over the site.
Houses on Halbeath Rd and those on Pratt St (Raith) are much closer. Unbelievable. Ps What's a NIMBY lol
0 -
Thanks
0 -
What does the "qualifying" part mean?
0 -
Whats the format for this cup? Play so many rounds and wos/sos/eos come together?
0 -
13 minutes ago, Truthteller said:
No chance of that bluebell, it's all about the handshakes
It's all about adhering to what was agreed and not moving the goalposts.
0 -
14 minutes ago, bluebell1 said:
Deary me, your missing the point
No point missed here mate
0 -
Dundonald didn't get their way, poor them, stamp feet
2 -
6 minutes ago, Che Dail said:
"There was an agreement in place, 'but...'". But what? But there is an agreement in place - end of story.
"it's very unfortunate on the teams being relegated..." has a very 'unfortunate' arrogant reek about it.
One possible new proposal / question might be something like:
"Answer Yes or No: Should a winner be nominated based on PPG over the past two incomplete seasons?".
That way, at least there is one winner and nobody else is any worse off than they would be if the league stuck to the original agreement, which was with all the clubs.
What's the problem having another season with 18 teams in the Premier?
Another season? We haven't even had half a one yet lol
1 -
2 minutes ago, Che Dail said:
But it already has been agreed: if the season can't get to 50% of fixtures it is null and void. And that's that - There should be no further discussion or entertaining any proposed changes at this late stage.
Almost half the clubs did not believe the season should have started in the first place, and that viewpoint has now been vindicated.
It must simply start afresh on exactly the same basis as this season, but with an extra conference.
No promotion, no relegation and no penalties for any of the reluctant participants.
100% last season was unique. There was no heads up a pandemic was gonna hit. Season was curtailed in APRIL near the end of season some teams had played nearly 20 games. No one could complain about teams who went up.
This season we all knew where we stood starting. 50% or N&V. To potentially promote a team who has played 7 and relegate 4 (of those 2 teams have played 10) isn't right.
2 -
18 hours ago, GordonS said:
Gonny calm down? The volunteers that have to make these decisions aren't trying to get them wrong or piss anyone off. They've got a lot to weigh up and whatever way they go they shouldn't get abuse or criticism for it.
Also, just while I'm here, there's never any need for more than one comma at a time and it doesn't help you make your point.
What decision? Its 50% or null and void. Clear as day. Only decision is whether there's a restart.
2 -
It was agreed 50% completion or null and void. Everyone knew what the script was. I understand the Kelty situation as it would be unfair after what happened last season not to give them a chance of a cracking at league 2. Don't think anyone could grudge that.
0 -
Aye yer right, feck the rules
1 -
Vale should not be relegated if the league couldn't get to at least 50%.
1 -
10 hours ago, AlanCamelonfan said:
But that was what the original proposal was. To put a grass pitch their
I was talking solely about the astro.
0 -
On 19/03/2021 at 10:01, AlanCamelonfan said:
Council mucking around. I dont k how why they dont get the developer to upgrade the fleet grounds
Its owned by south west Fife Trust. Although although Rosyth are primary users they don't have authority to take full control. Not to say they couldn't get a formal lease and develop it bit that's why they can't as it stands.
0 -
15 hours ago, Burnieman said:
The pragmatic solution is to complete the season to halfway and settle on PPG as agreed by clubs but now seems unlikely, or null & void as agreed by clubs.
Clubs didn't agree on the 50% scenario. That was a board decision. Not that it may make any difference, just clarifying.
0 -
Anyone heard any info from eos on relation to their meeting with sfa yesterday
0 -
Talking about distanced training not matches
0 -
9 hours ago, Ormi said:
It’s only youth football that’s got the go-ahead so far. There’s been a bit of confusion over it but amateur football, as well as EoS, LL etc, isn’t allowed to start on the 15th.
I don't understand what the difference is?
0 -
How come grassroots football can return on 15th July but seniors can't? Surely expectation would be the other way about!
0
The Premiere Division 2021-22
in East of Scotland Football League
Posted
Wow, let the haters hate.....