Thorongil
-
Posts
1,816 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Thorongil
-
-
1 minute ago, Granny Danger said:
Salmond is a creep.
You’re a creep.
6 -
13 hours ago, Leith Green said:
Even during the trial (where he was acquitted !) he stated while giving evidence that he had made inappropriate sexual moves on two civil servants! How the crown couldn't make a case on any of it was almost mind boggling.
Seeking sex with an adult woman isn’t a crime though, is it?
He was found not guilty on all criminal charges and the government findings against him were quashed by the highest civil court in the land.
Do you wish a crime had been committed?
0 -
20 cops searching the house again today.
Wonder what is actually going on.
0 -
1 minute ago, welshbairn said:
How's that going?
Hard to say.
0 -
1 minute ago, itzdrk said:
It's not just unionists, the pro independence genital inspectors are absolutely desperate anaw.
Take GRR out of this and it’s STILL a shitshow. Stop clinging to excuses or mitigations for what is a catastrophic f**k up that so many cheered on with glee.
0 -
Just now, TheScarf said:
No one is blaming Unionists for this. We are talking about the Unionist reaction and how much they appear to be cuck losers.
But what else do you expect and why even care? We have bigger fish to fry than worrying about unionists right now.
The damage that has been done to independence by Sturgeon, Murrell and their followers is an absolute disaster. Focus needs to be on resolving this and getting away from it.
Those two clowns, their acolytes and all those who have ignored to destruction of the party over the last 7 years are a disgrace.
2 -
Just now, TheScarf said:
Absolute fucking cucks. Getting hard/wet over being governed by another country who sees us as a millstone.
It’s hard to blame Unionists for this one. This is all entirely self inflicted and the people to blame are Sturgeon, Murrell and all their supporters who would not listen to concerns from within the party and instead mercilessly trampled on what they saw as dissent.
0 -
8 minutes ago, Hedgecutter said:
Imagine falling to a level where you're genuinely desperate for a crime to have been committed.
That was particularly bad with regard to the Salmond trial.
0 -
51 minutes ago, Leith Green said:
I havent paid a huge amount of attention to this guy for a couple of years, but had another look this week.
The guy has got - if anything - even worse.
His tweets are bad enough, but the people who follow him are absolute bampots. Its actually quite difficult to take any of it seriously.
Campbells scattergun tendency to tag people as "bad yins" then claim he is itk when one of his many crackpot theories comes true is hilarious.
He is dangerous as well - he tweeted yesterday about his "list of journalists he told about the Murrell story" . Some of the stuff his followers tweeted in response would be scary if you happened to be one of those named journalists.
Got any examples of these scary tweets?
0 -
1 hour ago, Billy Jean King said:
Missing? You clearly haven't followed UK politics for long. The rate parties (ALL political parties) get through cash at is eye watering. You also now appear to be inventing a completely new financial "scandal" when the reality is political parties have always spunked cash as if it grew on trees. I suspect if there was a grain of substance to your allegation the gutter press would have been all over it for years.
Yes, because the media were very keen to get on board with the missing £600k.
0 -
1 hour ago, Billy Jean King said:
Missing? You clearly haven't followed UK politics for long. The rate parties (ALL political parties) get through cash at is eye watering. You also now appear to be inventing a completely new financial "scandal" when the reality is political parties have always spunked cash as if it grew on trees. I suspect if there was a grain of substance to your allegation the gutter press would have been all over it for years.
There there. We’ll see.
0 -
3 hours ago, Leith Green said:
It's a bit daft to conflate salmonds "sleepy cuddles" with whatever legal process Murrel faces tho......
See?
0 -
1 hour ago, carpetmonster said:
Nonces.
0 -
3 hours ago, welshbairn said:
Do you know this or are you guessing?
I am led to believe.
0 -
3 hours ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:
There's been a few but not those numbers.
You're confusing yourself with posts that pointed out that Salmond could be innocent yet his behaviour could be seen to be creepy and inappropriate.
They are not mutually exclusive positions.
I’m not. And neither set of people were in court, with much of the evidence heard secret to this day. Salmond was acquitted by a majority female jury in front of a female judge.
The cries of “innocent until proven guilty!” from these people this time around are going to be a hoot.
0 -
1 minute ago, itzdrk said:
My membership was £1 a month and quite frankly you are a mug if you paid more.
Still millions missing from the massive increase in members. Very few paid as little as £1.
0 -
16 minutes ago, Leith Green said:
Salmond was acquitted because of staggering levels of incompetence in the crown office.
The suggestion that he was in some way the innocent victim (when there were about 12 complainants who put their careers on the line) is ludicrous in the extreme.
See?
0 -
18 minutes ago, lichtgilphead said:
How do you get £30m?
£1 a month is the minimum subscription. 125000 x 12 only equals £1.5m per year, and 125000 was the highest membership figure in any of these years
Membership was £5 per month.
£5 x 125,000 per month is £7.5m per year.
0 -
11 minutes ago, Granny Danger said:
Who were they?
It would be unfair to start singling them out. There were hundreds.
0 -
1 minute ago, Granny Danger said:
Were there posters on here who claimed Salmond was guilty after he was acquitted?
Yep!
0 -
1 minute ago, StellarHibee said:
This is exactly what you'll do when they're acquitted.
I guarantee you I will not.
Looking forward to the “innocent until proven guilty” cries from the people who conducted their own armchair trials of Salmond.
0 -
32 minutes ago, welshbairn said:
I don't think I would have been too upset if I'd donated to the fund and they blew it on the 2019 GE campaign, given the result. No idea what the legal framework of this was, but as usual, the major legal jeopardy likely concerns a cover up rather than the allocation of funds, unless the allegations involve actual theft or breaking electoral spending rules.
The real question is what has happened to the £30m of membership fees that came in between 2014 and 2019.
For an organisation with as few employees and overheads as the SNP that’s quite the windfall when their membership rose from 25000 to 125,000.
Employee Headcount didn’t increase. MPs, MSPs their staff and cooncilors get their pay elsewhere.
so where did the £30m windfall go?
0 -
The thing I’m really looking forward to most of all is the cry of “innocent until proven guilty” from the people who found Salmond guilty before his trial and even still found him guilty after he was actually acquitted.
That’s going to be some cheek. Chortlesville, Wisconsin.
0 -
I told yous these people were villains. I will never forgive them for the damage these two narcissists have done to the SNP and the cause of independence.
Who would honestly believe anymore that they didn’t try to fit up Salmond?
0
Oor Nicola Sturgeon thread.
in The Politics Forum
Posted
See what I mean?