Squonk

Not sure why everyone is getting so aeriated about the set of accounts of a meaningless and expendable operating company. If said operating company goes tits up, our forward-thinking football administrators will simply license another off-the-shelf debt-free newco(mpany) to operate the same club with a derisory and utterly meaningless points deduction as the only sanction. Those football administrators will also argue that (Third) Rangers should ply its trade in the top division for the good of Scottish football. What's not to like? I believe it was Jorg Albertz Einstein who defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome, but clearly those who 'wrestled back control of the club' wurnae listening. Meanwhile, the SFA turns a deaf eye and a blind ear to the same old. The people should be indebted for their saviours' indebtedness. It can't be easy to win a solitary top league title in eight and a half years of existence with cumulative debts of just a hundred and six million quid.

Those claiming it wasn't a sending off because Porteous didn't make contact don't understand the basic rules of the game. If player 1 aims a haymaker of a punch, but player 2 manages to duck out of the way, player 1 should still be sent off. Porteous' tackle was a potential leg-breaker because his airborne lunge was high and totally out of control. It's not as if Aribo was inconsiderate and should've left his leg in position to have it shattered just to prove a point!