CityDave94

Bonnyrigg Rose 2-0 Forfar Athletic Elgin City 2-1 Edinburgh City Peterhead 3-0 Clyde Stranraer 2-1 Stirling Albion The Spartans 1-1 East Fife

Ayr United 2-1 Morton Dunfermline 1-1 Queen's Park Hamilton 0-2 Partick Thistle Livingston 3-0 Airdrieonians Raith Rovers 0-2 Falkirk

Naïve? What are you talking about? He stuck around for for a long time saying thanks and goodbye to everyone.

Around .5 sec faster than anyone else and the fastest lap of the race. Looks like a goodbye from Daniel Ricciardo in his final race., maybe F1 career over. Next step - career as F1 Sky TV pundit beckons.

Article on driver contracts from start of season that has recently been updated to take in recent driver market developments. https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/when-f1-drivers-contract-expire/ Looking at Alonso and Stroll until 2026, both maybe to retire at the end of that year. They should be up at the front by at least challenging for podiums by the end of 2025 given the hype over which team Adrian Newey should join. Imagine Lance Stroll as Grand Prix winner?

Clyde 0-2 Elgin City East Fife 2-1 Peterhead Forfar Athletic 1-1 Stranraer Stirling Albion 1-0 Bonnyrigg Rose

Morton 2-1 Airdrie Partick Th 0-1 Dunfermline Ath Queen's Park 1-2 Ayr United Raith Rovers 1-1 Hamilton A

There's management reshuffles going on just now at Red Bull so the current driver line up might be under threat next season. Its unusual that Red Bull give the dreaded 'vote of confidence' to a driver and that driver not only survives without with out any improvement in performance but gets another contract, especially when Red Bull have such a reputation for being ruthless and cutting drivers from the driver programs. Where is the line drawn where Perez is costing the team points and the money he brings the team is not enough to cover any damage done? Plus can anyone imagine a declining Sergio Perez as team leader if Verstappen goes elsewhere in 2026? Tsunoda has been massive in pulling RB up the grid and score points, same last season, he's improved a lot. It will be good next season also that he'll have a team mate that can consistantly push him, see if he can raise the performance bar up a level.

New one off liveries for Singapore, Red Bull have abandoned their fan designs due weight concerns. There's supposed to be a one off livery for McLaren to add as well.

I've seen in media, Lawson in from the USgp til' the end of season, but there are rumours in the media, strong ones from withing the team that Lawson could be in the car for Singapore. The idea is now that Ricciardo hasn't done enough to beat Tsunoda and time has ran out. Tsunoda has had the better of him most races, when the original point of this was to evaluate Ricciardo against Tsunoda to replace Perez at Red Bull. Might as well put Lawson in the car asap and give him a chance to gain more experience looking forward to next season. With Perez staying and now rumours of Verstappen heading off to Mercedes (2026), Red Bull are wanting two experienced drivers to evaluate and be ready to move over to Red Bull if Verstappen does decide to move. Also Perez has underpreformed and the consistancy in these performances point to a decline and this decline will only get worse the longer it continues, so even both drivers currently at RB have a chance claiming both seats for 2026. Added to that is the decline in Red Bull going from a dominating position to a car that look more like getting nothing better than podiums with Adrian Newey away and huge management reshuffle. Their stock is not as high as it was this time last season. Less attractive to the top drivers.

Lawson to replace Ricciardo for Singapore. It could be that the rumour that Lawson has to take part in 5 races this season as part of his contract with RB is correct. Could finally be the end for Ricciardo.

I find this a bit confussing, I don't understand why Gardiner waited until now to ask for his concert company money back when he could have got on the list of creditors. I'm not sure how it works?? Seperate company, I understand.? The dissolve process was complete 27th June this year and if he was owed money back then there should have been some settlement surely. If there was none then he shoud have understood the risks. The concert company was sepererate from the club for exactly this reason, that if the concert company ran into financial trouble then the club would still be ringfenced and safe. I don't understand Gardiner's stand point here. Has he been told by his legal advisors to do this? It makes no sense. I can see that if he is owed by the club then yes, he can ask for it back if the original agreement was a loan and it was done properly. I think in this case for the alleged £20k both parties can agree an arangement there the rest looks like he's having a laugh. However if it turns out he's at it then he's going to lose in more ways that one. Absolute c*** of a man. I hope the words 'roaring' himself' 'making' 'a' and 'rip' can get added to that previous sentence of mine in the next few weeks.

Clyde 1-1 Edinburgh City Elgin City 1-0 Bonnyrigg Rose Peterhead 2-0 Stirling Albion Stranraer 1-4 East Fife The Spartans 2-1 Forfar Ath

Dunfermline 0-0 Raith Rovers Airdrie 0-4 Falkirk Ayr Utd 1-1 Partick Th Livingston 2-1 Hamilton Accies Queen's Park 1-2 Morton