Turbo_dee Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 Fair enough, it can be argued that the standard has dropped, but is it really because of too many games? In the game just finished, people came out and said they couldn't be arsed or were just mucking about with their role. Therefore the drop in standard isn't the number of games, it's the players choosing to play knowing full well they won't put in the effort, or will deliberately be shit. The simple solution is: don't sign up unless you genuinely want to play. The reason the last game went stale so quickly is because the Mafia targeted people that wanted to play leaving many posters that were simply going through the motions. The thing I find weird is that the people moaning about the standard of the games are the people that are playing shit. Ludo, GY and GtG were all absolutely hopeless in that last game. Just admit it's not the number of games that's the problem, it's the number of players that can't be bothered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forehead7 Posted March 13, 2012 Author Share Posted March 13, 2012 PM? I was making a joke, I'm not actually starting a hierarchy PM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 Fair enough, it can be argued that the standard has dropped, but is it really because of too many games? In the game just finished, people came out and said they couldn't be arsed or were just mucking about with their role. Therefore the drop in standard isn't the number of games, it's the players choosing to play knowing full well they won't put in the effort, or will deliberately be shit. The simple solution is: don't sign up unless you genuinely want to play. The reason the last game went stale so quickly is because the Mafia targeted people that wanted to play leaving many posters that were simply going through the motions. The thing I find weird is that the people moaning about the standard of the games are the people that are playing shit. Ludo, GY and GtG were all absolutely hopeless in that last game. Just admit it's not the number of games that's the problem, it's the number of players that can't be bothered. In what way was I hopeless? I called the whole mafia team and I just just a civillian, you're talking shite there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 You voted a player that had been killed already. I knew he'd come back to be mafia. I did say I was totally gubbed that night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo_dee Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 In what way was I hopeless? I called the whole mafia team and I just just a civillian, you're talking shite there. How many players did the 'best mafia player on this site' manage to convince? Although, the last part of my post was mainly in jest, I still feel it's a valid point. The reason I included your name was the day you posted saying you couldn't be fucked and voted for a dead player. That was shambolic, compared to your ability in the past. For what it's worth, I knew Jambo Stu was innocent and I would've fought hard to get G-man out rather than Diamonds, were I still in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gy diamond Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 I'm on my phone and couldn't be bothered going back to read what you said but again you don't understand what is opinion and fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 How many players did the 'best mafia player on this site' manage to convince? Although, the last part of my post was mainly in jest, I still feel it's a valid point. The reason I included your name was the day you posted saying you couldn't be fucked and voted for a dead player. That was shambolic, compared to your ability in the past. For what it's worth, I knew Jambo Stu was innocent and I would've fought hard to get G-man out rather than Diamonds, were I still in the game. I couldn't be fucked because the game was a bandwagon fest. Exactly why I couldn't convince anyone and why this debate has happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo_dee Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 In my opinion, arguing over something being fact or opinion is extremely tedious. Isn't this a fact? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 In my opinion, arguing over something being fact or opinion is extremely tedious. Isn't this a fact? Your lack of experience is tedious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo_dee Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 I couldn't be fucked because the game was a bandwagon fest. Exactly why I couldn't convince anyone and why this debate has happened. I know, I just wanted to get involved. I'm fine with whatever happens as I usually enjoy playing these games no matter what the gap between games is. Perhaps I'm in the minority though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forehead7 Posted March 13, 2012 Author Share Posted March 13, 2012 Y U ALWAYS ANGRY? It's because I'm overcompensating. I'm on my phone and couldn't be bothered going back to read what you said but again you don't understand what is opinion and fact. I didn't say my opinion was fact, I said I think it's fact. Obviously, I think my opinion is right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbo_dee Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 Your lack of experience is tedious. Can I have some of yours, gramps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forehead7 Posted March 13, 2012 Author Share Posted March 13, 2012 I couldn't be fucked because the game was a bandwagon fest. Exactly why I couldn't convince anyone and why this debate has happened. Well you should've been able to start a bandwagon on one of us. Like a good player can do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 Well you should've been able to start a bandwagon on one of us. Like a good player can do I've never advocated bandwagons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forehead7 Posted March 13, 2012 Author Share Posted March 13, 2012 I've never advocated bandwagons. The end justifies the means. What happened to the Ludo that would do anything to win? Disappoint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 The end justifies the means. What happened to the Ludo that would do anything to win? Disappoint. He never existed? I've always been for the team. All for the team. Which is why the 1 time I was terrorist, I ended up siding with the village. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quentin Taranbino Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 Probably a rubbish idea but I'll throw it out there anyway. I Propose having 5 grand slams/ppv's a year: 1 x survivor game 1 x Apprentice game 1 x TRS Mafia game 1 x Forehead Powers mafia game 1 x GTG old school mafia game Outside of these 5 grand slams, people can have as many mafia games as they want. Personally I would only sign up for the grand slams . What this would mean: People who want fewer games can only sign up for the grand slams thus improving the quality of these games. People who want to play more games/ host games can do so as they please in and around these games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 I vote for Gordon's idea. Think it's a cracker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quentin Taranbino Posted March 13, 2012 Share Posted March 13, 2012 It also means apart from the 5 grand slams in the year there is no set schedule so will please those people as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forehead7 Posted March 13, 2012 Author Share Posted March 13, 2012 Probably a rubbish idea but I'll throw it out there anyway. I Propose having 5 grand slams/ppv's a year: 1 x survivor game 1 x Apprentice game 1 x TRS Mafia game 1 x Forehead Powers mafia game 1 x GTG old school mafia game Outside of these 5 grand slams, people can have as many mafia games as they want. Personally I would only sign up for the grand slams . What this would mean: People who want fewer games can only sign up for the grand slams thus improving the quality of these games. People who want to play more games/ host games can do so as they please in and around these games. You're going to break your streak? What about hosts like Kyle and Turbo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.