Monkey Tennis Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Leaving in a few minutes Monks, always good to leave with a belly full of Rangers Haters 'Injustice' Is that not cutting it a bit fine? When's kick-off? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Is that not cutting it a bit fine? When's kick-off? If he is just leaving from perth at 11:20 then he is going to be late. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyWellFan Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 He won't be anywhere near the game today 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 You make it sound like there is an argument here, there really isn't, that is the difference between those who believe we are a new club and those who do not. An argument would suggest that people's opinion could be swayed, that is something that will never happen, those who believe the new club stuff will believe it forever, those who do not likewise. Like FB said there were several things said that go directly against the new club stuff in recent court cases, but you rarely see Rangers fans bothering to even point them out whereas the likes of doleman deliberately feel the need to omit things or twist to try and prove a point. There is absolutely nothing for Rangers fans to worry about, you protesting it does not make it so. At the end of the day all the high power protesting is not being done by Rangers fans, they do not feel the need to, all of it is being done by those who are desperately still trying to prove a point....and proving that point was yet another failed attempt by the Scottish football monitor to change the SFA's stance on this matter a few weeks ago... Why can you and others like you not just be happy with you own beliefs? Why be so desperate to change the minds of those who you already know will never believe your version? You seem to be writing some fair sized essays for someone who does not care. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 You seem to be writing some fair sized essays for someone who does not care. It's worth noting that Tedi is right, and there is "no argument" about Rangers continuation. Almost every football fan in the country thinks that Rangers died in 2012 and the new club is a tribute act. Only Rangers fans disagree. So this is only an "argument" in the sense that there's an "argument" about e.g. whether the moon-landings were faked. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 You seem to be writing some fair sized essays for someone who does not care. 4 years and the second highest post count 'proves' he doesn't care what people think?! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 4 years and the second highest post count 'proves' he doesn't care what people think?! Not to mention all the effort to delete posts where he has subsequently found to be wrong. God knows how many thousands that fall into this category. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Not to mention all the effort to delete posts where he has subsequently found to be wrong. God knows how many thousands that fall into this category. Not to mention his numerous aliases. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Leaving in a few minutes Monks, always good to leave with a belly full of Rangers Haters 'Injustice' ^^^ seething that he tupe'd over and can't admit it. Good luck today btw, I hope youz Phil follow followers get through. More fun that way 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 ^^^ seething that he tupe'd over and can't admit it. Good luck today btw, I hope youz Phil follow followers get through. More fun that way ^^^ Two cheeks... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Killie is, hence wanting them to get through to continue the lolzers. Mccoist for manager ffs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Killie is, hence wanting them to get through to continue the lolzers. Mccoist for manager ffs. Come back to me when we've signed a joint sponsorship deal with them. Thanks for playing. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Joint manager-go-round trumps that.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 From willie Waddell to McCulloch with twfplg in the wings. Lol. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aDONisSheep Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 I think it's fair to say, that the definition of this PlasticRangers Club is that they are no more than a brand. It's universally agreed that at best, their 'club' (stop laughing at the back) has no legal personality. As such, throughout it's history (what did I say about the laughing), it has never signed a player (that's the company), it's never owned a ground (that's the company) etc, etc. The good news is that you can pick up t'history and 54 and counting for a mere 50p (if you've got big hands). Still, you've gotta laugh! aDONis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Point proven, McCulloch got the better side to play for the replay. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Deflecting much? BTW the fact that the hearing was not about old or new clubs is exactly why I referred to some of the judge's and counsel's comments as causing 'collateral damage'. Why do you need everything explained twice, benny? Collateral damage lol The new sporting integrity.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 #qotd Judge Lord Brodie "I find it hard not to think in legal terms, we are in a court. We are not here for our skill as metaphysicians" LOL 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 (edited) Collateral damage lol The new sporting integrity.... Your club are suffering plenty of the former and little from the latter. Edited February 6, 2016 by The DA 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted February 6, 2016 Share Posted February 6, 2016 Jim Moffat gave Bill Struth his budgies for free, and used to give Rangers players free holidays. The original bigot brothers 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.