wunfellaff Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 The fans may well like to know but I'm not sure they have the right to know about an individual's tax affairs. Not in minute detail, just 'involvement'. For clarity 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-18 ICBM Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Fact No.1 lol, there are many camps in the beeb, Daly is only 1. And I doubt he would get close enough to ask questions. The ones that could, won't. Fact No.2 Just think of two reasonably well-connected "peepul" at the Beeb. Would Wee Chico ever ask a question that made Sally or Wattie at all uncomfortable? We've all seen the YouTube clip that shows what happens when he does.... Doddsy - quite happy to drop the club in the shite on air and in print. Subsequently pretty quiet on the subject and (admittedly I'm in Englandshire), I've not heard him being grilled on the subject. Something doesn't smell right with the whole affair, and the suspicions don't do rangers any favours. As I've said, would it be too much for Sally to say, for the sake of transparency, whether he did benefit, or not? After all, have the fans not got a right to know? 'Rangers' are dead, you shouldn't expect intelligent replies from their zombie fans. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 The fans may well like to know but I'm not sure they have the right to know about an individual's tax affairs. It's not about rights, or about probing into an individual's affairs. I am sure, if he was a recipient, he would have been given the same porn=star advice that everyone else was, and can say he bvelieved the advice given. And, if he didn't receive an EBT, that's one less stick to beat the club with. I'm just saying that there's nothing to stop McCoist declaring his status re: EBTS in order to remove at least one cloud of suspicion over the club. An uncharitable view could be that he's got something to hide. Coupled with his demands for publicity over the tribunal's membership, it's not great PR. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 It's not about rights, or about probing into an individual's affairs. I am sure, if he was a recipient, he would have been given the same porn=star advice that everyone else was, and can say he bvelieved the advice given. And, if he didn't receive an EBT, that's one less stick to beat the club with. I'm just saying that there's nothing to stop McCoist declaring his status re: EBTS in order to remove at least one cloud of suspicion over the club. An uncharitable view could be that he's got something to hide. Coupled with his demands for publicity over the tribunal's membership, it's not great PR. Well why did you ask about the fans having a right then? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenolly Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 It's not about rights, or about probing into an individual's affairs. I am sure, if he was a recipient, he would have been given the same porn=star advice that everyone else was, and can say he bvelieved the advice given. And, if he didn't receive an EBT, that's one less stick to beat the club with. I'm just saying that there's nothing to stop McCoist declaring his status re: EBTS in order to remove at least one cloud of suspicion over the club. An uncharitable view could be that he's got something to hide. Coupled with his demands for publicity over the tribunal's membership, it's not great PR. Maybe he never had one, or was one of the players that had one butknew nothing about them as they didn't have a side letter, several of the players had no side letter but had a take home pay as part of their contract, as far as they were concerned rangers dealt with their tax as long as they had the pay agreed depositted in their account they were happy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Well why did you ask about the fans having a right then? Steady, you're going a wee bit Amigo on us. Simply alluding to Sally's demands for transparency, stacked up against his reticence in this matter. It may be a bit late now, but at least if he stopped warning people off rangers' turf for their own safety for a minute and said "I had an EBT for £xxx - I was advised this was a legitimate payment. I now realise there were concerns over the implementation, and will cooperate fully with the investigation," he would gain some PR advantage - and wouldn't be admitting to wrongdoing. If he didn't have an EBT, the statement is even simpler. Either way, people would have increased respect for him. Of course, given some of Hector's recent digging at the BBC, Sally's day job might not be his biggest concern, tax-wise.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boghead ranter Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Have never read this before...http://www.followfol...218/index.shtml "The AGM was packaged in a manner that master-of-spin Tony Blair would have been proud" "John McLelland found it necessary to pay tribute to Murray – acknowledging "what he has done for and meant to the club." Presumably this includes taking the club to the brink of bankruptcy…" "With a Balance Sheet that resembles a disaster area," "one is left pondering what auditors Grant Thornton thought of this sleight of hand." "the meeting ended in rancour when shareholder Jim Christie demanded to know why 'FOLLOW FOLLOW' was banned from the Press Box whilst the likes of Gerry McNee were granted access. Martin Bain predictably replied that 'FF' was banned because of its' sectarian content, whilst stressing that the club recognised "the freedom of the Press." He was shouted down, leaving Chairman John McLelland to close the meeting with a plea that "we must rise above all of this." This was 10 years ago, written by Rangers fans. Obviously these fans were feeling conned by the board of the time. How prescient. So it is unfair to brand all Rangers/Sevco supporters like Bennett, Tedi, Bendarroch, Bearwithme and Youngsy who are enthusiastic fans but obviously not the brightest shillings in the jar. IMO you're being a bit unfair to at least 2, maybe 3, on that list, in all fairness. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 lol, there are many camps in the beeb, Daly is only 1. And I doubt he would get close enough to ask questions. The ones that could, won't. He got close enough to open and air a full investigation into the club so really that's just nonsense. He's investigated the EBT case and who the beneficiaries are and neither McCoist nor Smith have been uncovered as such. It was an in depth investigation for which he received many plaudits on here so are you or anyone else suggesting he was negligent as regards McCoist as a beneficiary.If so that would destroy his credibility within the BBC would it not. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-18 ICBM Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 He got close enough to open and air a full investigation into the club so really that's just nonsense. He's investigated the EBT case and who the beneficiaries are and neither McCoist nor Smith have been uncovered as such. It was an in depth investigation for which he received many plaudits on here so are you or anyone else suggesting he was negligent as regards McCoist as a beneficiary. If so that would destroy his credibility within the BBC would it not. Not from you or any of the other zombie 'The Rangers' fans on here he did not. As for your 'negligent' and 'credibility' comments...coming from yourself a 'The Rangers' man...that was fkn funny! You people truly are the laughing stock of world football in 2012 and forever. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 (edited) Not from you or any of the other zombie 'The Rangers' fans on here he did not. As for your 'negligent' and 'credibility' comments...coming from yourself a 'The Rangers' man...that was fkn funny! You people truly are the laughing stock of world football in 2012 and forever. Seriously you really do post the most repetitive nonsense on here. Edit too add,for someone who joined this forum 10 days ago you've really got up to speed on this thread or perhaps the truth is that you're just one of these clowns that post under different names,you really are a fucking clown. Edited October 28, 2012 by youngsy -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 He got close enough to open and air a full investigation into the club so really that's just nonsense. He's investigated the EBT case and who the beneficiaries are and neither McCoist nor Smith have been uncovered as such. It was an in depth investigation for which he received many plaudits on here so are you or anyone else suggesting he was negligent as regards McCoist as a beneficiary.If so that would destroy his credibility within the BBC would it not. No I don't think it would/does. A/ he knows others got paid - the unnaccounted dosh. B/ he doesn't know who Easy peasey. It may be that it is McCoist. It may not be. So FPLG should say, and frankly the question should have already been asked by one of a blue persuasion. It probably has, and I think we would have heard if he was in the clear......... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 EBT, no EBT, McCoist remains a c**t. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-18 ICBM Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Seriously, i really do post the most repetitive nonsense on here. The truth is that I am just one of the zombie clowns that post under different names, i really am a fucking clown. I don't doubt that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinnesTON Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Is all the money that was paid into the EBT scheme accounted for in terms of payments ? Are we now in a position to all agree that these payments were illegal ? Why not contact Daly or FPLG or even RTC if the Beeb issued a full list or whether there are more names and whether one of them is Fat Sally. I reckon we won't know until the full thing is exposed but then rather than constant denial some of the continuation tribe could actually ask questions relating to their club/clubs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 There is no way that mcoist had an ebt, with the number of leakes that have already happened then this would have became public, you asked them for proof, they have none, its simply another tic wet dream Has anyone from the supporters asked him? If not, why not? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Some amount of fishing on the non subject of McCoist having an EBT, we were told at the time that Beebs included all EBT's and unless the disgraced lawyer or some anonymous blogger can prove otherwise thats how it is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-18 ICBM Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 (edited) He is the jakey itwasnaeme, just ignore him, this id will be banned soon enough like his other 4 or 5 If you didn't persistently and consistently post so much tedious codswallop on this thread using your numerous usernames i would ask you what the hell you are on about. But i'm old and wise enough to know that you 'The Rangers' fans are well known for accusing innocents of doing what you yourselves are and have been doing forever while pleading that you are innocent and being persecuted. Edited October 28, 2012 by SS-18 ICBM 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Some amount of fishing on the non subject of McCoist having an EBT, we were told at the time that Beebs included all EBT's and unless the disgraced lawyer or some anonymous blogger can prove otherwise thats how it is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Another deflection attempt from the guy who wanted to stop this shite and start proper debates earlier 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thenolly Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Has anyone from the supporters asked him? If not, why not? come on why? what else should they ask him, "hey Ally have you ever worn womans clothes? snorted powder drank windowlene pumped a donkey Come on if thereis a thread of evidence then aye but I think we may be clutching at straws here 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.