flyingrodent Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 ^^^^^^^^ Frustrated love affair IMO 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-18 ICBM Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 ^^^^^^^^ Frustrated love affair IMO No. Just a sense of humour. You should try finding yourself one lad. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 ^^^^^^^^ Frustrated love affair IMO Me and SS18, oh aye we can't get enough of each other. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 1. This is the tax tribunal so it is not the exact same question .... Fivestars comprehension FAIL yet again ... surprise. 2. Your signature still makes you look like a clown ... hard time ignoring me .. eh LIAR Here was your question and the reply .. ya lying wee slanderous Orc Toad ... You work hard at trying to fool people that you are just a decent guy .. but the stark reality is there for all to see . you are just another failed wee lying scumbag ,.... Now show where I replied in the manner you stated .... Love the Orcs that greenied this ... You happy to associated with posters like this that back you up Youngsy .,.. I'd be interested to know your views .... seeing as you have such deep moral convictions ... Again a simple yes or no will suffice ... Why are you trying to involve me in a previous conflict of views that had nothing to do with me? If someone agrees with me then fine,if they don't then fine. Not a problem for me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 I love you number everything so that the P&Bers can try to understand it all, you're some guy. Anyway you lied and got caught (again), then posted some uber dodgy stuff which makes you look a bit suspect. All in all another normal Norman day. Typo's supplied for your benefit So where did I lie? Ever? (f**k it, I'll make it really easy for you, seeing as you're a thick c**t and can't remember/prove/repost any of these "lies") What that I have posted is "uber dodgy"? (again, select from my entire oeuvre - different threads, sites, forums, IDs, subjects, fill yer boots!) "Suspect"? How, exactly? Poor grammar isn't a typo. But you are really, really stupid. Or, to avoid offending whatever your "minority of the week" may be, let's say "differently aware". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbungo1874 Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 (edited) You gotta love rangers/sevco fans. They get a wee victory, they don't care how or why it happened, a win's a win, GIRUY, we arra peepul(whatever that actually means), ect ect. Exactly the same on or off the pitch. Same when they lose...."it was somebody else's fault"..On or off the pitch. Pathetic. Why is it Rangers get Liquidated and it's Craig Whytes doing and has nothing to do with Rangers however when Rangers are seen to have won the FTT why is it not David Murrays victory and nothing to to with Rangers? Edited November 23, 2012 by Umbungo1874 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Why is it Rangers get Liquidated and it's Craig Whtyes doing and has nothing to do with Rangers however when Rangers are seen to have won the FTT why is it not David Murrays victory and nothing to to with Rangers? Is it because rangers are dead? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Me and SS18, oh aye we can't get enough of each other. I meant you and WRK - Felix and Oscar, the two of you. SS18* interposed. *He could strike the "18" and get to the point quicker, I reckon. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Absolutely no fucking idea, Youngsy. I was replying to you. Well i think you've got your wires crossed,go back to post 98301 and pick up from there. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Why is it Rangers get Liquidated and it's Craig Whytes doing and has nothing to do with Rangers however when Rangers are seen to have won the FTT why is it not David Murrays victory and nothing to to with Rangers? Oh,Murray can have the victory,i'm just pleased to see that the verdict finding was in favour of the PLC. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Well i think you've got your wires crossed,go back to post 98301 and pick up from there. Nah, life's too short. One assumes we were simply rehashing the last three days' worth of back-and-forth. Apologies if I've offended. I was simply alluding to the penalties handed down for VAT fraud to directors (plural, note) of a company. Some of those on the BOD at ibrox may be sweating, given their legal responsibilities. Anyhoo, onward and upwards, eh? What price Cillian's first hat-trick tomorrow? Ooops, off-topic.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kincardine Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 (edited) Very interesting piece on the tax case decision: http://broganrogantrevinoandhogan.wordpress.com/2012/11/23/the-hoover-the-runaways-and-a-judicial-nod-is-as-good-as-a-wink-on-the-rangers-tax-case/ Not interesting at all. The whole, "In the mid 1960′s a fifteen year old girl ran away from home." stuff is just fabricated shite. What is this? The scion of The Big Tax Case Blog? The opening 3rd of that shite is to blogging what The People's Friend was to journalism. Is this what The Plastics are hanging their hope of redistributed titles on? Edited November 23, 2012 by Kincardine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 I meant you and WRK - Felix and Oscar, the two of you. SS18* interposed. *He could strike the "18" and get to the point quicker, I reckon. With the greatest of respect, Fliedermaus - f**k that! I've got some specialist interests, but I don't do inter-species. That's how the Uruk-hai happened, is it not? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbungo1874 Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Oh,Murray can have the victory,i'm just pleased to see that the verdict finding was in favour of the PLC. A liquidated PLC that died not paying taxes 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 I meant you and WRK - Felix and Oscar, the two of you. SS18* interposed. *He could strike the "18" and get to the point quicker, I reckon. I'm afraid that Normans mother wouldn't approve of that. Appreciated though FR. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Not interesting at all. The whole, "In the mid 1960′s a fifteen year old girl ran away from home." stuff is just fabricated shite. What is this? The scion of The Big Tax Case Blog? The runaways bit does seem a bit pat, Kincardine, but it's the kind of "one-off" case that lawyers love to quote to make their point on something completely different. Maybe apocryphal, but he's only used it to exemplify the way judges can manipulate the law in order to come to a desired conclusion. The rest of the post is pretty interesting, but a lot of it is obviously the work of someone who doesn't agree with the verdict, no matter what he's actually saying. We do seem to be getting a better quality of made-up bollox since the verdict, mind - with the exception of Hateley's ill-informed drivel in the Retard today. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 With the greatest of respect, Fliedermaus - f**k that! I've got some specialist interests, but I don't do inter-species. That's how the Uruk-hai happened, is it not? Mutilated Elves, according to Christopher Lee. But he is very old... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Nah, life's too short. One assumes we were simply rehashing the last three days' worth of back-and-forth. Apologies if I've offended. I was simply alluding to the penalties handed down for VAT fraud to directors (plural, note) of a company. Some of those on the BOD at ibrox may be sweating, given their legal responsibilities. Anyhoo, onward and upwards, eh? What price Cillian's first hat-trick tomorrow? Ooops, off-topic.... No offence whatsoever,i was just wondering where you were coming from. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliche Guevara Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 (edited) Talking out of your erse There is no rule saying we have to declare loans The Tribunal found that players received recoverable loans. I am unaware of any SFA rule which requires loans to be disclosed. No player may receive any payment of any description from or on behalf of a club in respect of that player’s participation in Association Football or in an activity connected with Association Football Has anyone explained how the above doesn't apply to payments of loans? I think the SPL have this sewn up. Old Rangers are currently in the clear in terms of side-contracts but have outed themselves over undeclared payments. Guilty of SPL charge A but currently not guilty of charge B. Edited November 23, 2012 by Cliche Guevara 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 23, 2012 Share Posted November 23, 2012 Mutilated Elves, according to Christopher Lee. But he is very old... Aye, well, The Lord of the Rings was a PG kind of a book, so Tolkien couldn't lay it out, but it appears.... Orcs were fucking humans 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.