Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

So why would they state they would drop their legal claim against Rangers then if the SFA breach of contract proceedings are halted? If the SPFA want to set a precedent then surely they wouldn't try and use this claim as a bargaining tool.

That would seem strange, as I said I was only guessing, probably why I'm not a union rep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would love to hear it if he did.

This guy fascinates me, it would be great to put a voice to the written verse.

I equate him to the great poets, Keats, Byron, guys like that.... only sitting in his cold dark flat in a pair of pish stained skid marked Y's, supping on a litre bottle of High Commisioner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't condemned them in any way,what i have stated that irrespective of their views on the club continuity they had an opportunity to give something back to the club,whether they view things differently or not,they proclaimed themselves Rangers supporters so in that respect surely they must have felt a loyalty to the support and the ongoing welfare of the club.

As far as i'm concerned they have been given poor advice,no doubt from their agent,about the status of the club,because whatever the argument there has been no definitive decision of continuity of the club from a legal aspect,whereas there seems to have been from the SFA and SFL after transference of membership. Very significant that the only Rangers fans,Naismith,McGregor, that viewed the club differently from the every other Rangers fan,including players and former players,are those that gained financially from this.

This entire post assumes and accepts the (heavily revised) chuckie cheese theory of continuation after liquidation. The players you speak of (along with everyone outside the new club and the MSM) dont subscribe to that. They believe the club died and therefore owed no loyalty to a brand new team club and company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they are not employed by the club Youngsy; the company employed them. The club and company are separate when suits your argument and combined when not. Please make your mind up which you prefer and let us know ....

:lol::lol::lol:

ETA: I see you clarified your position in a later post to state that the players are 100% legally correct and Green is talking out of ass yet again.

Of course they were correct under TUPE in not transferring over from old company to new company,that is their right. Doesn't make their opinion on the status of club continuation correct though.

Edited by youngsy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course they were correct under TUPE in not transferring over from old company to new company,that is their right. Doesn't make their opinion on the status of club continuation correct though.

Well their opinion at the time of not TUPEing over to the new company was the same as Walter Smith, The Blue Knights and Charles Green that by refusing the CVA that the OldCo/Club had died and all the history was lost [ go look back at any press statements or interviews from that time].

Every one suggested that the CLUB had died.

Only the desperate fans and Chuckie are persisting with the continuance crap.

:lol:

Edited by edi1011
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The book also detailed how we apparently tried to sign Michael Laudrup from Real Madrid, after we just survived relegation to the 3rd tier of english football. With McDonald and Green claiming we were serious, did they know they were trying to kid Blades fans, the most cynical of all fans!

seems chuckie likes the threes. and is that an investor i ask

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The perfect christmas pressie Rico.

http://www.amazon.co...55331391&sr=1-2

Product Description

THE KENNEDY KILL

When Joe Kennedy ordered a Mafia hitman to assassinate Winston Churchill, he set in motion a chain of shocking world shattering events which led to his son, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, being gunned down in Dallas twenty-five years later. At its heart was the Churchill Letter. If it is found by the wrong people it could fracture the American-British Alliance, end the Special Relationship and lose the War on Terror.

Newspaper reporter Niven Robb is at the heart of the mystery. He saved Churchill’s life, he knew Joe Kennedy, JFK and Bobby Kennedy, too. He was also a pal of Frank Sinatra. When Niven Robb dies, his grandson Ritchie Robb, who is also a newspaper reporter, falls heir to the biggest story of his or any other reporter’s life. A story which will make Watergate look small potatoes.

The story begins in London, moves through the war years to New York and Washington DC, switches to Dallas in November 1963 and finally, dramatically, ends in Thailand, on a small Island in the Gulf of Siam.

Hmm... wink.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1355331581[/url]' post='6887814']

Of course they were correct under TUPE in not transferring over from old company to new company,that is their right. Doesn't make their opinion on the status of club continuation correct though.

You've got to wonder what he was told by the club in the few weeks after this article was published

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/rangers/9254963/Steven-Naismith-says-his-future-is-at-Rangers.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've got to wonder what he was told by the club in the few weeks after this article was published

http://www.telegraph...at-Rangers.html

Article date: 09 May 2012

Naismith was the subject of a failed bid from West Bromwich Albion - reported to be in the region of £2 million - which was rejected by administrators last month.

He said: "There was a lot of speculation about it and the manager spoke to me and said there had been a bid made and it had been rejected."

"For me, there was nothing else to deal with, nothing else to do."

"The club had rejected an offer for me and that's fair enough."

"The administrators are there to run the club in the best way possible."

"Although it was flattering that someone would make a bid when I was injured, it was nothing I ever really had to consider as the bid was rejected."

Old articles such as that are great for reminding us of happenings that have been forgotten due to the disinformation campaign that Green and Co. have been waging upon Scottish football since his Consortium bought the assets of Rangers FC (R.I.P.).

I had forgotten that Rangers FC (IA) had rejected a £2million bid for 'injured' Naismith in April 2012, the league was already over. huh.gif Why wasn't that offer accepted?! ...an opportunity to inject £2million into the old club's coffers and decrease the monthly wage bill by selling just one 'injured' player, while 'In Administration' rejected! wink.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...