Guest Kincardine Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 Bit harsh.......even a moron can see your clubs deid. What is it with folk wanting to call people morons today? Even on our natch thread with Montrose there's a guy coming out with the same 'moron' shite: http://www.pieandbovril.com/forum/index.php/topic/193957-montrose-v-rangers-sat-1230pm/page__view__findpost__p__6897494 Anyway, are you happy that what was Britain's best multi-team discussion forum has now turned in to a site to discuss Rangers? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kincardine Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 As opposed to wee fannies saying "oor club's naw deid & yoo lot ur jist pyoor obsessed" at every given opportunity. There is one huge difference. "Your club's deid" can be said on any thread and without provocation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 Almost as amusing as P&B's obsession with Rangers. What used to be a delightful meeting place for people who enjoyed Scottish football (and culture and politics) has been overrun by wee fannies typing "Yer club's deid and you're a moron" at every given opportunity. I'm sure they died. I read it somewhere. Really put a spring in my step that day. I'm with the Montrose programme guy. New club currently puffing and panting away in Division Three. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 What is it with folk wanting to call people morons today? Even on our natch thread with Montrose there's a guy coming out with the same 'moron' shite. Thats a bit of moronic thing to comment on tbh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 There is one huge difference. "Your club's deid" can be said on any thread and without provocation. To the victors go the spoils. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 There is one huge difference. "Your club's deid" can be said on any thread and without provocation. To the victors go the spoils. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 So, you are saying that one cheek of the arse's most important topic is the fate of the other cheek? Who would have thought it. Curious - you 'support' one of the brown star clubs who's interest in both cheeks knows no bounds. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 (edited) Aye your teams complete lack of ambition is only matched by its fans "Ambition!" You support Rangers, but wish to criticise other clubs over a lack of ambition? Can I respectfully suggest that vaulting ambition has not really served your club's purposes too well of late? "Ambition" is possibly the most abused term in all football discussions these days. In my experience, what people mean by "ambition", is rarely a good thing when they're talking about football. Edited December 16, 2012 by Monkey Tennis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlito's Way Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 I'm sure they died. I read it somewhere. Really put a spring in my step that day. I'm with the Montrose programme guy. New club currently puffing and panting away in Division Three. All I'll say is I'm glad the likes of UEFA, FIFA and the SFL don't think the same as you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Sensible Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 All I'll say is I'm glad the likes of UEFA, FIFA and the SFL don't think the same as you. Yes they do. They all think the same. UEFA won't allow you in Europe. The SPL wouldn't let you in. The SFL put you in the 3rd Division and not the First Division and didn't seed you in the League Cup. Even the Rangers fans themselves last season knew that liquidation meant the end, hence the protests against Bill Miller and asset stripping. And why? Because The Rangers is a brand new football club... Even Jim Traynor think his new employers are a new club! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlito's Way Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 Yes they do. They all think the same. UEFA won't allow you in Europe. The SPL wouldn't let you in. The SFL put you in the 3rd Division and not the First Division and didn't seed you in the League Cup. Even the Rangers fans themselves last season knew that liquidation meant the end, hence the protests against Bill Miller and asset stripping. And why? Because The Rangers is a brand new football club... Even Jim Traynor think his new employers are a new club! UEFA have as down as the same club, the SFL have as down as the same club with all our honours intact. So I fail to see what you're getting at here. Have a look on the UEFA website and you'll see we're still there for the 2012/13 season, I'm sure we're in 88th place. Have a read at what the ECA said about Rangers. It doesn't matter what the narrow minded fans of other clubs in Scotland say as all the governing bodies see us as a club with all our history. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotbawmad Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 (edited) What I can say is Agent_868 is not a bear, he has called us vermin before Jumping to conclusions before the storys even broke? No doubt the story will be about the SPL/SFA aiding and abbeting a certain club that either plays or used to play Ibrokes. BTW, how is that share issue going? I've heard you raised in excess of a million pounds. Edited December 16, 2012 by Fotbawmad 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbungo1874 Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 UEFA have as down as the same club, the SFL have as down as the same club with all our honours intact. So I fail to see what you're getting at here. Have a look on the UEFA website and you'll see we're still there for the 2012/13 season, I'm sure we're in 88th place. Have a read at what the ECA said about Rangers. It doesn't matter what the narrow minded fans of other clubs in Scotland say as all the governing bodies see us as a club with all our history. Thats right Charles Green bought them, I am a bit old fashioned and think Clubs should win titles not purchase them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highlandmagyar Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 Thats right Charles Green bought them, I am a bit old fashioned and think Clubs should win titles not purchase them. Christ! That's a hell of a bolshie concept down Ibrokes way! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barrysnotter Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 The BBC have just cemented their place on "the list". The downfall of Rangers just got a mention on SPOTY. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 The BBC have just cemented their place on "the list". The downfall of Rangers just got a mention on SPOTY. It pissed me off. They said that Rangers were "demoted" to the 3rd division - factually inaccurate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barrysnotter Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 <br />It pissed me off. They said that Rangers were "demoted" to the 3rd division - factually inaccurate.<br /><br /><br /><br />They were just being kind. But, they'll still be on the list. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Sensible Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 UEFA have as down as the same club, They don't. Hence why you aren't in Europe. the SFL have as down as the same club with all our honours intact. They don't. They have you in the 3rd Division and they didn't seed you in the League Cup. So I fail to see what you're getting at here. What I'm getting at is that Rangers are dead. Have a look on the UEFA website and you'll see we're still there for the 2012/13 season, I'm sure we're in 88th place. That is a reference to the club now in liquidation. Have a read at what the ECA said about Rangers. They said that Swiss Law meant that they had to give The Rangers a new category of membership because its a brand new club. It doesn't matter what the narrow minded fans of other clubs in Scotland say as all the governing bodies see us as a club with all our history. As Jim Traynor said, it doesn't matter how you dress it up, Rangers are dead. You aren't in the SPL because The Rangers are a new club. You aren't in the First Division because The Rangers are a new club. You had to apply for membership to the 3rd Division because The Rangers is a brand new club. You weren't seeded in the League Cup because The Rangers is a brand new club. You aren't in Europe because The Rangers is a brand new club. The club called Rangers isn't listed in the assets bought by Sevco because The Rangers is a brand new club! Deal with it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Sensible Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 Its in the Daily Record so it must be true with their well researched articles. What this poster likes to see is evidence to back up such claims. Just like this constant bickering we read every day in the written press or on football forums over if Rangers are a new club or a continuation of the old, what does it matter anyway, owners, boardroom directors, players, stadiums training grounds etc come and go but its the supporters that are the heart and soul of football clubs, some things are beyond having a price put on them. Titles and history are not saleable assets they are carried with those that lived through it and experienced it and if supporters have those, then why is it right for others who did not experience the history have any right to pick and chose what is and what is not rightly yours. You are totally correct. Titles and history ARE NOT saleable assets. You are correct that the experience of winning those trophies - albeit many of them were achieved by cheating - all by the exploitation of sectarianism and intimidation - but the club you experienced those victories with is now dead. You now follow a brand new club. A club which hopes to follow in the footsteps of the now dead Rangers by continuing to exploit sectarianism, hatred & bigotry. Have fun! -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted December 16, 2012 Share Posted December 16, 2012 It's amusing how Rangers fans' agendas change constantly on here. ECA's word is now gospel due to them being UEFA and FIFA endorsed. Remember FARE? FARE are also UEFA and FIFA endorsed but I remember them being "run by Kafflicks" etc any time they reported the old deceased clubs fans for acts of bawbaggery. You "peepul" do make me laff 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.