Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

Sooooooooooooooooooooooo

New clubs must be GRANTED SFA membership, this did not happen to Rangers, the membership was as you know TRANSFERRED

Why were Rangers not GRANTED an SFA membership?

:)

Because Rangers never had the criteria to be granted a membership and they still only have an associate membership not a full one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Kincardine

The bit about Rangers being too big to fail does indeed raise the hackles a bit. I actually see where you're coming from, but the need for Rangers to be treated as others would be, was a genuine and pressing concern. It's very easy to mock the notion of integrity and characterise it as hatred instead.

I don't think we disagree on much but I can see why my phrase may rankle a little.

What really boils my piss is The SPL acting all innocent and as if nothing happened. Oh and The SFA doing their 3-monkeys act. A shower of ineffectual b*****ds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we disagree on much but I can see why my phrase may rankle a little.

What really boils my piss is The SPL acting all innocent and as if nothing happened. Oh and The SFA doing their 3-monkeys act. A shower of ineffectual b*****ds.

I also think Longmuir has been lucky to emerge smelling of roses though. It's often overlooked that he was squarely behind the plot to pitch Rangers into SFL1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we disagree on much but I can see why my phrase may rankle a little.

What really boils my piss is The SPL acting all innocent and as if nothing happened. Oh and The SFA doing their 3-monkeys act. A shower of ineffectual b*****ds.

Totally agree.

If the SFA had done their job effectively they would have refused The Rangers membership. :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also think Longmuir has been lucky to emerge smelling of roses though. It's often overlooked that he was squarely behind the plot to pitch Rangers into SFL1.

Oh. he hasn't :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sooooooooooooooooooooooo

New clubs must be GRANTED SFA membership, this did not happen to Rangers, the membership was as you know TRANSFERRED

Why were Rangers not GRANTED an SFA membership?

:)

Because the SFA can break their own rules and make up new ones on the spot.

As I've shown before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you go about becoming a member of this club?

Do you know any members of the club?

25 years ago I was a member of a darts club. Not enough folk turned up and paid their subs so it folded................ 1 year later it relaunched, same pub, same league, some of the same players..

Wasn't the same club :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Kincardine

25 years ago I was a member of a darts club. Not enough folk turned up and paid their subs so it folded................ 1 year later it relaunched, same pub, same league, some of the same players..

Wasn't the same club :)

Tell that tale to Hibs fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New clubs have to apply for SFA membership, if succesful they are GRANTED membership.

Rangers are not a new club proved by the fact they did not have to apply for a membership, the membership was transferred, it is the same membership

The SFA also made up on the spot, the "temporary membership" to allow the Brechin game to be played. It didn't exist before then.

This proves that SFA rules are, at least, flexible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because Rangers never had the criteria to be granted a membership and they still only have an associate membership not a full one

"A statement later on Friday read: "The Scottish FA can confirm that The Rangers Football Club Ltd have today received confirmation that full membership of the association has been transferred."

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11788/7960503/SFA-rubber-stamp-Gers-membership

Looks like a full membership to me.

Have a nice day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell that tale to Hibs fans.

I've been through this with others.

I don't care.

If someone wants to tell me that my club began in 1913 (circa?) then I'm fine with that. I don't care if that means that we can't claim any honours before that. It's not something I ever talk about anyway and is pretty much irrelevant to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are not willing to accept the SFA rules then there is simply no point in debating, those are the rules.

:lol: SFA 'rules' Tedi..................want to debate what ''SFA rules''the dead club broached?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct it is a full membership, I was clearly speaking about the SFA membership, Nolly is simply wrong on this point.

And 'Rangers' had a full SFA membership last year.............'The Rangers' have a full membership this year.

Took a transfer.

Different club.

The SFA licence 'clubs' not 'Companies'..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You dont have to, I never said you should.

But debating with someone who will not accept the rules is pointless, those are the rules

Billy Dodds said he had a dual contract given to him by the dead club. That ain't in the SFA rules Tedi..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...