hellbhoy Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 I work for a small Co that has a profit sharing scheme.................... of ''net profit''.' ............ If a big one is due they spend on 'Capital investment' , no much profit........... Example was 2 years ago they bought a trailer to launch boats in rough weather. Cost = umpteen thousands. Never used and rusting but came off bonus amount, same as for shareholders if a PLC............ Right got ya now. The offshore investment funds it is then :lol: :lol: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 This was exactly what The FTTT examined. ie were the payments part of a contract or were they discretionary and reoverable advances. The FTTT rulded in our favour. If The 3 Monkies of The SPL arrive at a different conclusion then I'd be amazed and call foul. Out of curiosity, have the people been named as creditors of Rangers? I honestly lost the thread then...... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kincardine Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Well there's some sort of scam going on at Ibrox for sure and I know the cash will siphoned out somehow. So there's a future scam at ibrox. You also doubted season ticket sales for next season over here: http://www.pieandbovril.com/forum/index.php/topic/197238-the-seville-graph/page__view__findpost__p__699865 Given that pretty-much every prediction about Rangers on this thread has been wrong then would you be sensible and learn a lesson? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 I'm sure Hellboy won't be long in telling us all about his investors dividends figures, once again the floor is yours.... Hurry up Hellboy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 So there's a future scam at ibrox. You also doubted season ticket sales for next season over here: http://www.pieandbov...post__p__699865 Given that pretty-much every prediction about Rangers on this thread has been wrong then would you be sensible and learn a lesson? I suggest you go back to page one on this thread and read through it without the blue tinted specs Kincardine because there's plenty of posts on here that Rangers fans on other forums said would never happen and it did.Notice how I said other forums because only the two No8's and Bennett were on the big thread until August last year. I actually thought myself Rangers ST's would hit around 25K there about ! Anyhoo Green is a shyster ! you know and I know it and is out to fleece as much out of Rangers as he can before being run out of Dodge. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 I'm sure Hellboy won't be long in telling us all about his investors dividends figures, once again the floor is yours.... Hurry up Hellboy. Green and Rangers = the fans are fucked that's about all you'll understand Benny 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Green and Rangers = the fans are fucked that's about all you'll understand Benny You claim you know the exact figures which will be paid in dividends amongst other things, go on fill us in. If you have the facts to back it up, i'll listen and hell you may even convince me that you're right. The floor is yours ..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 So there's a future scam at ibrox. You also doubted season ticket sales for next season over here: http://www.pieandbov...post__p__699865 Given that pretty-much every prediction about Rangers on this thread has been wrong then would you be sensible and learn a lesson? The ''main'' prediction was that Ran@ers would die...........that happened \O/ waves at Youngsy £100 quid ya bottler 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 You claim you know the exact figures which will be paid in dividends amongst other things, go on fill us in. If you have the facts to back it up, i'll listen and hell you may even convince me that you're right. The floor is yours ..... Oh Benny has got a bone in his mouth ! or is that a boner ? I'll counter claim by asking you to post exact figures yourself because what's the point of me posting stuff when Benny already has the answers because Benny has seen the Rangers accounts and has copies of everything Green has accounted in Rangers accounts. So if I post something and you try to debunk it yourself without actually knowing the answers yourself then what's the point in asking me to post the exact figures when Green hasn't published any figures ! and if you had actually followed the thread Wunfellaff actually corrected me earlier on any sizeable dividend Green is likely to show in the accounts Now the floor is yours Benny ! you wanna dance 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 So you just made them up, cheers Hellboy for clearing it up. I was looking forward to debating it with you but alas it wasn't to be. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 So you just made them up, cheers Hellboy for clearing it up. I was looking forward to debating it with you but alas it wasn't to be. Bennett, you know Youngsy, gie him a shout over the carity bet thing will you? He has gone MIA....................... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 So you just made them up, cheers Hellboy for clearing it up. I was looking forward to debating it with you but alas it wasn't to be. No I did not make them up it was a speculative approach to what may be the case and didn't post it as the gospel. If you wanna debate and speculate then go ahead then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 The ''main'' prediction was that Ran@ers would die...........that happened \O/ waves at Youngsy £100 quid ya bottler \O/ waves at Youngsy £100 quid ya bottler 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 not sure if I am being ''whooshed'' considering who you both support, but the decades old answer is Celtic. (short for ''The Sporting Wing of the IRA) Whoosh n that 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 They were not privy to the evidence of the players and agents that testified the payments were part of the contract for their wages. What part of that do you not understand? TamPayne posted an FTTT link and it's like a game of fucking cluedo with the witnesses names a Mr Scarlet and a Mr Red and a Mr Violet and so forth FFS nearly pissed myself as I was expecting Mr Murray and a Mr Bain :lol: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kincardine Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 The ''main'' prediction was that Ran@ers would die...........that happened We are dead. 107,100 posts about us confirm this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kincardine Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 They were not privy to the evidence of the players and agents that testified the payments were part of the contract for their wages. What part of that do you not understand? Ah here we have it. HMRC would have arrived at a different conclusion over a several-year investigation if they had listen to Billy Dodds? Is this the straw that you're grasping? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 This was exactly what The FTTT examined. ie were the payments part of a contract or were they discretionary and reoverable advances. The FTTT rulded in our favour. If The 3 Monkies of The SPL arrive at a different conclusion then I'd be amazed and call foul. The first part of your post is correct. The FTTT came to the conclusion that the payments constituted loans. The second part however, requires a gigantic leap. The SPL monkeys can happily agree on the loans front, but then decide that titles must be stripped because players weren't properly registered to compete. That's why clubs have had Cup tie results overturned. I wish - repeatedly - that you'd stop pretending to misunderstand this demonstrably simple point Kincardine - why won't you acknowledge it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 The first part of your post is correct. The FTTT came to the conclusion that the payments constituted loans. The second part however, requires a gigantic leap. The SPL monkeys can happily agree on the loans front, but then decide that titles must be stripped because players weren't properly registered to compete. That's why clubs have had Cup tie results overturned. I wish - repeatedly - that you'd stop pretending to misunderstand this demonstrably simple point Kincardine - why won't you acknowledge it? The whole point of the FTTT was only on whether the trust was avoiding tax and that's about it,it wasn't whether Rangers had improperly registered players because that's the SPL's commissions job now. If any of the players EBT's MIH admitted to before the BTC was declared as a taxable bonus then players have been paid out with the associations rules and will automatically become a 3 point deduction for each game played by them. Murray has sold Rangers on and will be no concern to him whatever as he runs MIH now and probably does not care whatever the commission does. The commission is not a kangaroo court and will show in it's minutes later what evidence if any has lead to titles being stripped from the footballs history books for Rangers.If any of the former players EBT's have been declared bonus payments before the BTC it will definitely mean that Rangers have improperly registered players and will fall subject to the associations rules of punishments. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 19, 2013 Share Posted January 19, 2013 Based on a tic blog IMO, or at least that is the excuse he will use when its pointed out how utterly impossible his suggestion is. And you can fcuk right off ya dodo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.