stonedsailor Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 and whining as to where all the money went ... you'd think they were not warned about the spivs plans for the IPO money. Let's hope the leaseback of Ibrokes is completed soon ... everything is on course as per the timmy grand master plan .. You Sellick fans must have to sleep with an aqualung, all these wet dreams coming true. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 (edited) Okay guys, who's provoking the Rangers fans beyond their will today? What a terrible existence it must be, to be at the mercy of such uncontrollable impulses. It's so sad that they're the only fans in world football that have no moral agency whatsoever and are unable to make personal decisions, because of the unacceptable provocation that is some hack saying something they don't like on a minority radio show. Bless. Fantasising again about what might stir the shite for your pet poodles I see. Jum didn't just say 'something', but decided that he could ignore the guidance from the BBC own trust who had already slapped BBC Scotland for their errant ways. So many have tried very hard to pretend that poor wee Jum is in the shite for nothing at all - there have been hundreds of legitimate complaints. No one is going to condone the threats or abusive attacks - who would? - but why would he get a free ride for ignoring the instructions of the very people who employ him? And so many have tried very hard to only narrate one strand of this sorry tale, too. The NUJ organiser Holleran, for example, has notably failed to speak up about the abuse levelled at other journalists for daring to stay silent on the subject of wee Jum. I wonder why that is? Wee jum has been transformed from a shared figure of fun in scottish fitba - second only to p***k young - to become the poster bhoy for the perpetually malcontent/we hate Rangers online communities. Other journos being abused by supporters not of Rangers? Who gives a f**k, eh? It seems certainly not those in the perpetually malcontent gang. Edited September 14, 2013 by Bendarroch 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Bless. Fantasising again about what might stir the shite for your pet poodles I see. Jum didn't just say 'something', but decided that he could ignore the guidance from the BBC own trust who had already slapped BBC Scotland for their errant ways. So many have tried very hard to pretend that poor wee Jum is in the shite for nothing at all - there have been hundreds of legitimate complaints. No one is going to condone the threats or abusive attacks - who would? - but why would he get a free ride for ignoring the instructions of the very people who employ him? And so many have tried very hard to only narrate one strand of this sorry tale, too. The NUJ organiser Holleran, for example, has notably failed to speak up about the abuse levelled at other journalists for daring to stay silent on the subject of wee Jum. I wonder why that is? Wee jum has been transformed from a shared figure of fun in scottish fitba - second only to p***k young - to become the poster bhoy for the perpetually malcontent/we hate Rangers online communities. Other journos being abused by supporters not of Rangers? Who gives a f**k, eh? It seems certainly not those in the perpetually malcontent gang. Horrific, even by your own low standards. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehoss Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 (edited) Bless. Fantasising again about what might stir the shite for your pet poodles I see. Jum didn't just say 'something', but decided that he could ignore the guidance from the BBC own trust who had already slapped BBC Scotland for their errant ways. So many have tried very hard to pretend that poor wee Jum is in the shite for nothing at all - there have been hundreds of legitimate complaints. No one is going to condone the threats or abusive attacks - who would? - but why would he get a free ride for ignoring the instructions of the very people who employ him? And so many have tried very hard to only narrate one strand of this sorry tale, too. The NUJ organiser Holleran, for example, has notably failed to speak up about the abuse levelled at other journalists for daring to stay silent on the subject of wee Jum. I wonder why that is? Wee jum has been transformed from a shared figure of fun in scottish fitba - second only to p***k young - to become the poster bhoy for the perpetually malcontent/we hate Rangers online communities. Other journos being abused by supporters not of Rangers? Who gives a f**k, eh? It seems certainly not those in the perpetually malcontent gang.[/quote So fair enough he went against the rules of his employers and gave his own opinion rather than the company line. The reaction is got surely outweighs what he said though right? Edited September 14, 2013 by thehoss 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 (edited) Bless. Fantasising again about what might stir the shite for your pet poodles I see. Jum didn't just say 'something', but decided that he could ignore the guidance from the BBC own trust who had already slapped BBC Scotland for their errant ways. So many have tried very hard to pretend that poor wee Jum is in the shite for nothing at all - there have been hundreds of legitimate complaints. No one is going to condone the threats or abusive attacks - who would? - but why would he get a free ride for ignoring the instructions of the very people who employ him? And so many have tried very hard to only narrate one strand of this sorry tale, too. The NUJ organiser Holleran, for example, has notably failed to speak up about the abuse levelled at other journalists for daring to stay silent on the subject of wee Jum. I wonder why that is? Wee jum has been transformed from a shared figure of fun in scottish fitba - second only to p***k young - to become the poster bhoy for the perpetually malcontent/we hate Rangers online communities. Other journos being abused by supporters not of Rangers? Who gives a f**k, eh? It seems certainly not those in the perpetually malcontent gang. God, what to laugh at first?Let's start with the idea that Rangers fans are annoyed about a breach of BBC guidelines. Oh aye, those ignorant mutants take a keen, public-spirited interest in informative public service broadcasting, my hole. Then let's have a laugh at the idea that any Rangers fan in the country is upset on behalf of probably-allegorical journos who are getting abuse for not backing Spence. And let's finish with the idea that people generally find abusive Rangers fans offensive only insofar as it's a weapon against the Newco, as opposed to ordinary people finding the offensive Newco fans to be a shower of abusive weapons. Five stars for this crass attempt to insult the intelligence of everyone who reads it. Edited September 14, 2013 by flyingrodent 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Bless. Fantasising again about what might stir the shite for your pet poodles I see. Jum didn't just say 'something', but decided that he could ignore the guidance from the BBC own trust who had already slapped BBC Scotland for their errant ways. So many have tried very hard to pretend that poor wee Jum is in the shite for nothing at all - there have been hundreds of legitimate complaints. No one is going to condone the threats or abusive attacks - who would? - but why would he get a free ride for ignoring the instructions of the very people who employ him? And so many have tried very hard to only narrate one strand of this sorry tale, too. The NUJ organiser Holleran, for example, has notably failed to speak up about the abuse levelled at other journalists for daring to stay silent on the subject of wee Jum. I wonder why that is? Wee jum has been transformed from a shared figure of fun in scottish fitba - second only to p***k young - to become the poster bhoy for the perpetually malcontent/we hate Rangers online communities. Other journos being abused by supporters not of Rangers? Who gives a f**k, eh? It seems certainly not those in the perpetually malcontent gang. I thought you lot were boycotting the BBC, now their rules are not to be messed with? Hypocritical fuckers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Bless. Fantasising again about what might stir the shite for your pet poodles I see. Jum didn't just say 'something', but decided that he could ignore the guidance from the BBC own trust who had already slapped BBC Scotland for their errant ways. So many have tried very hard to pretend that poor wee Jum is in the shite for nothing at all - there have been hundreds of legitimate complaints. No one is going to condone the threats or abusive attacks - who would? - but why would he get a free ride for ignoring the instructions of the very people who employ him? And so many have tried very hard to only narrate one strand of this sorry tale, too. The NUJ organiser Holleran, for example, has notably failed to speak up about the abuse levelled at other journalists for daring to stay silent on the subject of wee Jum. I wonder why that is? Wee jum has been transformed from a shared figure of fun in scottish fitba - second only to p***k young - to become the poster bhoy for the perpetually malcontent/we hate Rangers online communities. Other journos being abused by supporters not of Rangers? Who gives a f**k, eh? It seems certainly not those in the perpetually malcontent gang. If he went against the BBC's guidance, that's up to the BBC to act how they see fit, without the guidance of The Rangers fans demand he be sacked. A free ride? Where do you draw the line? What's an acceptable way for The Rangers fans to act? What other journalists have been abused for staying silent? And by what other teams fans? Do you have evidence of this as I've not been aware of it. Why the use of the H in poster bhoy? He's the champion of the diddies. When do you think this transformation occurred? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Usual disaster for bendy this morning. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Psychopathy, I had never really thought about it before. No8 once told me that true Rangers fans are born, you simply cannot become one. He also said that once a Rangers fan, always a Rangers fan (incurable), it would explain the inability to see the world in a rational manner, the inability to accept the truth, the harbouring of grudges for eternity........... It's all becoming clear. Those who matter need no explanation .. Those that need an explanation don't matter. Pretty sure that is another one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 @ Bendarroch. Isn't this the fud that left P&B in utter humiliation after a complete pummelling on a St Mirren v Rangers (RIP) thread. Surely no one takes this c**t-turd seriously? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Nice to see Bennett making an arse of himself with one short statement this morning - then Bendarroch posts multiple paragraphs of "offended" bollox. It's almost as if they'd forgotten which account they were logged on with swapped PCs for the day. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Thing is, if a fan of my club (or most clubs) did that, other fans would roundly condemn the idiot and demand he be banned from the ground. Too many rangers fans go into deflection & whataboutery mode instead. I note the police statement didn't read: "The behaviour of a man who confronted Mr Spence in Angus on Thursday was described as 'not ideal but not surprising given his deliberate goading of the persecuted Rangers fans, and furthermore not that bad compared to the child abuse at Celtic park, the illegal invasion of Iraq, or the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime in Syria.'" Instead it was unambiguously condemned and left at that. No ifs, no buts, no whatabouts. So come on Rangers fans, you can do that too. We have to condemn every outburst by some looney who may or may not be a Rangers supporter? Surely it is a given that any normal thinking person would find it completely outrageous that a journalist is verbally abused in the street and worse still threatened. IMO what is worse is the fact that he was out with his wife at the time...I cannot begin to imagine what kind of hardman would attack someone out walking with his wife. Probably the same kind that would attack a dog on a bus. I once said sometimes i get embarrassed being a Rangers supporter but that is not quite right. I am proud to be a Rangers supporter but sometimes...too often recently...i have been left embarrassed by the behaviour of some who claim to support our club. Nail bombs sent to Lennons house...I am no lover of the man but ffs ...Nail Bombs?? Marching on the BBC. Why? If you don't like it don't fucking watch or listen. Send in emails...write letters but 50 silly wee lads with a couple of banners. I cringe to this day thinking about that Repeatedly singing songs that they know will get the club in trouble. Everytime the say the 'F' word you can see them giggling. It is pathetic Fan groups leaders leading boycotts of away grounds and then turning up themselves. I am surprised that never got more publicity. Needless to say it wasn't fat Dingwall as he is about as part time as it comes unless he can see a penny in it for himself. No Pyro ... No Party mob. Ok it was mildly amusing the first time but it is beyond a joke now. It has to stop!! As i said. I am sure the vast majority of Rangers posters are as sick of it as i am. Just because we don't rush on here to condemn it doesn't mean we agree with the actions of some. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BinoBalls Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Bless. Fantasising again about what might stir the shite for your pet poodles I see. Jum didn't just say 'something', but decided that he could ignore the guidance from the BBC own trust who had already slapped BBC Scotland for their errant ways. So many have tried very hard to pretend that poor wee Jum is in the shite for nothing at all - there have been hundreds of legitimate complaints. No one is going to condone the threats or abusive attacks - who would? - but why would he get a free ride for ignoring the instructions of the very people who employ him? And so many have tried very hard to only narrate one strand of this sorry tale, too. The NUJ organiser Holleran, for example, has notably failed to speak up about the abuse levelled at other journalists for daring to stay silent on the subject of wee Jum. I wonder why that is? Wee jum has been transformed from a shared figure of fun in scottish fitba - second only to p***k young - to become the poster bhoy for the perpetually malcontent/we hate Rangers online communities. Other journos being abused by supporters not of Rangers? Who gives a f**k, eh? It seems certainly not those in the perpetually malcontent gang. Refusal to unequivocally condemn those responsible. Check. Deflection. Check. Whataboutery. Check. Check. Check. Seriously how hard is it for a Rangers fan to say "Jim Spence said something he shouldn't have and I don't like his opinions in general, but what happened was totally and utterly unacceptable."?? On the evidence so far, the answer to that question is "extremely". All we've seen so far is a weak "can't condone it" followed by the usual mountain of garbage and excuses. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BinoBalls Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 We have to condemn every outburst by some looney who may or may not be a Rangers supporter? Surely it is a given that any normal thinking person would find it completely outrageous that a journalist is verbally abused in the street and worse still threatened. IMO what is worse is the fact that he was out with his wife at the time...I cannot begin to imagine what kind of hardman would attack someone out walking with his wife. Probably the same kind that would attack a dog on a bus. I once said sometimes i get embarrassed being a Rangers supporter but that is not quite right. I am proud to be a Rangers supporter but sometimes...too often recently...i have been left embarrassed by the behaviour of some who claim to support our club. Nail bombs sent to Lennons house...I am no lover of the man but ffs ...Nail Bombs?? Marching on the BBC. Why? If you don't like it don't fucking watch or listen. Send in emails...write letters but 50 silly wee lads with a couple of banners. I cringe to this day thinking about that Repeatedly singing songs that they know will get the club in trouble. Everytime the say the 'F' word you can see them giggling. It is pathetic Fan groups leaders leading boycotts of away grounds and then turning up themselves. I am surprised that never got more publicity. Needless to say it wasn't fat Dingwall as he is about as part time as it comes unless he can see a penny in it for himself. No Pyro ... No Party mob. Ok it was mildly amusing the first time but it is beyond a joke now. It has to stop!! As i said. I am sure the vast majority of Rangers posters are as sick of it as i am. Just because we don't rush on here to condemn it doesn't mean we agree with the actions of some. Appreciate the sensible response and I am not suggesting you all rush on and speak up on every idiot in your support, but the posters who have responded have so far just offered cheap excuses and deflection. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 You Sellick fans must have to sleep with an aqualung, all these wet dreams coming true. But, if you listen to some of The Rangers fans on here they start off with: "I know quite a few Celtic fans who are missing us, and can't wait for us to be back (Ha! Ha!) where we belong". Aye! F*cking sure we do! They could disappear up their own assholes for all I care. They could be like the old Laurel & Hardy movies, you know they're dead but you can always watch the re-runs and have a f*cking good laugh. Also, before any of The Rangers fans say "What are you doing on here then?". Simple. This is where I can get all the latest info & links instead of trawling through all the different websites. I want to have that JFK moment, ie "Where were you when The Rangers died for good?". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Refusal to unequivocally condemn those responsible. Check. Deflection. Check. Whataboutery. Check. Check. Check. Seriously how hard is it for a Rangers fan to say "Jim Spence said something he shouldn't have and I don't like his opinions in general, but what happened was totally and utterly unacceptable."?? On the evidence so far, the answer to that question is "extremely". All we've seen so far is a weak "can't condone it" followed by the usual mountain of garbage and excuses. It's not enough that you fantasise about your unrealisable wet dreams over thousands of pages, but now you want to dictate the language employed to do so, too? Away and take your face for a shite. Meanwhile - no explanation from a Rangers perspective is ever acceptable no matter how valid, relevant or plausible to a diddy - check. 'Roon ye -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Horrific, even by your own low standards. Ask one of the cleverer diddies to explain it to you and your sad b*****d, wee jum avatar. That'll be any of them really - except Rico. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 (edited) God, what to laugh at first? Let's start with the idea that Rangers fans are annoyed about a breach of BBC guidelines. Oh aye, those ignorant mutants take a keen, public-spirited interest in informative public service broadcasting, my hole. Then let's have a laugh at the idea that any Rangers fan in the country is upset on behalf of probably-allegorical journos who are getting abuse for not backing Spence. And let's finish with the idea that people generally find abusive Rangers fans offensive only insofar as it's a weapon against the Newco, as opposed to ordinary people finding the offensive Newco fans to be a shower of abusive weapons. Five stars for this crass attempt to insult the intelligence of everyone who reads it. I hadn't expected you to just lie in response - I have no idea why I didn't expect that. My bad. E.T.A. Allegorical was it? Here's a taster of your fellow bhoys in action over the last week 'defending' wee jum. Bhoy Green @GreenBhoy196710 Sep @MTHForum @maccasixty7 @zaceq in some countries journalist face death imprisonment to speak the truth In Scotland we have @JaneLewisSport Edited September 14, 2013 by Bendarroch 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 I thought you lot were boycotting the BBC, now their rules are not to be messed with? Hypocritical fuckers. Did you really think the whole Rangers support were boycotting the BBC? Did ye, aye? Were you also the guy who reported the recent 'sighting' of Nessie, too? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 If he went against the BBC's guidance, that's up to the BBC to act how they see fit, without the guidance of The Rangers fans demand he be sacked. A free ride? Where do you draw the line? What's an acceptable way for The Rangers fans to act? What other journalists have been abused for staying silent? And by what other teams fans? Do you have evidence of this as I've not been aware of it. Why the use of the H in poster bhoy? He's the champion of the diddies. When do you think this transformation occurred? i think if some Rangers fans felt Spence Jum deserved the sack then they have every right to express the idea. And I also think there's nothing any Rangers fan could ever do that you would find acceptable. It's just as well that fissll mean nothing much to anyone. And even less to Rangers supporters. I used the H to rip the pish regarding the heavy duty IRA supporters that have been 'comforting' Jum in his hour of need. He's been terribly grateful. He even managed to declare he was stepping away for twatter for an hour or two. He's back, btw. Did you read any of his invented drama-queen twatterings on his desperate hunt for work in light of last weeks events? He declared he was even taking Tebbit's advice - poor, poor, tragic Jum 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.