aofjays Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 Not just a bigot but a sectarian bigot Densboy putting the pie into pie and bovril..... Yes, without that qualifier someone might have thought you were a racist bigot like No.8. I'm sure you wouldn't want that now would you? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 (edited) Yes, without that qualifier someone might have thought you were a racist bigot like No.8. I'm sure you wouldn't want that now would you? ??????? i'm sure you'll be to explain this nonsense.... Edited November 20, 2013 by bennett 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 ??????? i'm sure you'll be to explain this nonsense.... He'd be as well trying to teach a cat to arc-weld. Any chance of rearranging your own post into a well-known phrase or saying? Wee clue, Vicky - there are many different manifestations of bigotry. Your little squabble with the green mob is only one of them. Hence, as aofjays said above, the qualifier. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 ??????? i'm sure you'll be to explain this nonsense.... Sorry is English not your first language? A bigot is just someone who view others negatively due to prejudices. A racist bigot views people of other races negatively. A sectarian bigot views people of other sects negatively. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 (edited) Inter's share price hits a new low. Dropped a penny on early trading, down to 40p a share. 52 week high was 94p. 57% down on high, 43% down on float price of 70p. I really hope none of my pension funds invested in this dog… It’s fine, we can all breathe a sigh of relief, Neil 'the cva will be accepted' Patey has announced that Sevco’s new ‘signing’ will ‘bring harmony to the boardroom at ibrox’. Thank goodness we've got almost a month till the AGM (if it ever goes ahead?) imagine the guff we will read in the msm from now till then, no need for a panto ticket there’s one being played out every day. Somebody's just dumped sold 3,328,672 shares.Obviously, there's a buyer there as well. I reckon that is a significant trade - £1.365m is fairly significant in most terms - unless it's buying a Norwegian striker - so what's behind this latest trade? Also on the shares - why have they just now started using quarter-penny increments? ETA: Just noticed - 7000 posts... FAO Bendarroch - relevant enough for you, or would you like to draw attention to the behaviour of Lawwell, or Dunfermline fans, or something? Mibbes throw in a few random "H"s? It's not the BRALT that was broken on Day One - it was rangers. HTH. Edited November 20, 2013 by WhiteRoseKillie 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 Somebody's just dumped sold 3,328,672 shares.Obviously, there's a buyer there as well. I reckon that is a significant trade - £1.365m is fairly significant in most terms - unless it's buying a Norwegian striker - so what's behind this latest trade? Also on the shares - why have they just now started using quarter-penny increments? Offft. A big player cashing in/getting out as rock bottom approaches? No idea on the incrementa, maybe just updated their site. There's rumours on the LSE site that the SPFL will be approaching Sevco to pay the 250k imposed on deadco for cheating. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 Offft. A big player cashing in/getting out as rock bottom approaches? No idea on the incrementa, maybe just updated their site. There's rumours on the LSE site that the SPFL will be approaching Sevco to pay the 250k imposed on deadco for cheating. In all fairness, that was a footballing debt, and the new mob agreed to pay all such as a condition of being allowed to start the "journey". Unless, of course, that cheating was carried out in the process of the deadco's many non-football enterprises? But then why would the fine be imposed by a Footballing Body? Questions, questions, and only rambling pish for answers. The fact that this debate is still going on after this time tends, in my mind, to strengthen the proposition that ICBINR are indeed nothing more than a Tribute Act. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 Sorry is English not your first language? A bigot is just someone who view others negatively due to prejudices. A racist bigot views people of other races negatively. A sectarian bigot views people of other sects negatively. Well i'm glad i don't come under any of those categories, thanks for enlightening me. IOU one of those green dots. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 Offft. A big player cashing in/getting out as rock bottom approaches? No idea on the incrementa, maybe just updated their site. There's rumours on the LSE site that the SPFL will be approaching Sevco to pay the 250k imposed on deadco for cheating. thats been doing the rounds for months now Witzit, it depends on two or three things. The wording of the agreement with the SFA, does it include future 'football' debts. The old oldco and newco twist. and finally the wording used by Billy Nimmo smith in his Judgement. I've a feeling it may go to court, where we seem to be in a winning habit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BossHogg Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 (edited) Anyone else notice that this little orc never links his cut n paste job. This is from 5 months ago and is currently being reviewed. Poor little orc.http://m.scotsman.com/news/scotland/top-stories/asa-clears-rangers-over-most-successful-club-ad-1-2962532I was wondering that...its all over twitter again as if its news.The ASAs own guidelines state that a company trying to use the history of a previously liquidated company can only do so if they have paid off all the debts of that company. The objection to the advertising, placed by the advertiser who is living off the reputation of a liquidated football club, is clearly in breach of the ASAs own rules Edited November 20, 2013 by BossHogg 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 (edited) So now a new CEO. Roll on the AGM. Popcorn time. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/25011885 ETA Sorry Kiddy, missed your earlier post. Edited November 20, 2013 by cyderspaceman 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theesel1994 Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 I was wondering that...its all over twitter again as if its news. The ASAs own guidelines state that a company trying to use the history of a previously liquidated company can only do so if they have paid off all the debts of that company. The objection to the advertising, placed by the advertiser who is living off the reputation of a liquidated football club, is clearly in breach of the ASAs own rules The reason it is all over Twitter again is because the appeal against the original decision has been thrown out. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 The reason it is all over Twitter again is because the appeal against the original decision has been thrown out. Close but not quite. The decision is unchanged (wasn't an appeal - ASA re-opened it) and the complainants now have 7 days to appeal. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 Close but not quite. The decision is unchanged (wasn't an appeal - ASA re-opened it) and the complainants now have 7 days to appeal. I am sure they will appeal. There are literally thousands of internet bampots like you who take pleasure in wasting other peoples time. 54 TITLES AND STILL GOING STRONG! -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 thats been doing the rounds for months now Witzit, it depends on two or three things. The wording of the agreement with the SFA, does it include future 'football' debts. The old oldco and newco twist. and finally the wording used by Billy Nimmo smith in his Judgement. I've a feeling it may go to court, where we seem to be in a winning habit. So basically you're the same club when it suits and a new club when it doesn't. How dignified. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 According to the recent regulatory news update for AIM last week, the only parties who owned enough shares to be able to sell the 3.328,672 which were sold today are : ArtemisHargreave HaleLaxeyBlue Pitch 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelegendthatis Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 Inter's share price hits a new low. Dropped a penny on early trading, down to 40p a share. 52 week high was 94p. 57% down on high, 43% down on float price of 70p. I really hope none of my pension funds invested in this dog… It’s fine, we can all breathe a sigh of relief, Neil 'the cva will be accepted' Patey has announced that Sevco’s new ‘signing’ will ‘bring harmony to the boardroom at ibrox’. Thank goodness we've got almost a month till the AGM (if it ever goes ahead?) imagine the guff we will read in the msm from now till then, no need for a panto ticket there’s one being played out every day. Obviously someone was keen to get out quickly. Dumped a relatively large volume which was bound to depress the price, rather than get out over a period. Not quite a vote of confidence in the new board that is being created. They may look ok on paper, but would expect that McColl and Blin have been working behind the scenes to get their story across to the shareholders (they know of). That might explain this "get out now and get out quick, cut your losses" sale. Wonder if the shares sold were ones that Easdale was planning to use for their voting at the AGM? Doomsday is getting closer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 thats been doing the rounds for months now Witzit, it depends on two or three things. The wording of the agreement with the SFA, does it include future 'football' debts. The old oldco and newco twist. and finally the wording used by Billy Nimmo smith in his Judgement. I've a feeling it may go to court, where we seem to be in a winning habit. It's not a "future" debt. It's a debt incurred by cheating and being caught. At football. A fine levied by a Footballing Body. There's no "oldco/newco" issue, as it's a purely football matter, levied upon a member club. Now, if you're saying that it wasn't the same club... Where is this on the ASA website? The only ruling I can find is the 26 of June where Rangers agreed to withdraw the advertising. Evened up Vicky's Helen for this, as it's a perfectly valid question. A question which, if the answer was one that Bennett was happy with, he'd be answering and crowing like a good'un all over the thread. I'm not sure which claim/appeal/advert it refers to, so I'm wondering the same as you. I'm also thinking Bennett suspects he may have made a cúnt of things again - hence the weaselly red and no adult reply. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BossHogg Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 According to the recent regulatory news update for AIM last week, the only parties who owned enough shares to be able to sell the 3.328,672 which were sold today are : Artemis Hargreave Hale Laxey Blue Pitch So some of the big guns have cut n run then. Rats and sinking ships. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBadSaint Posted November 20, 2013 Share Posted November 20, 2013 October 2010Graham Wallace, said Manchester City planned to comply with the new Financial Fair Play regulations. Their strategy is to propel City to the top, make more money from the TV and commercial boost the Champions League avails and gradually bring wages down by replacing ageing galacticos with graduates of the academy, on which City are also spending a fortune.Player acquisitions on the scale we have seen in recent transfer windows will no longer be required in the years ahead, now that we have such a deep and competitive squadWe expect our financial performance to position us to be compliant with financial fair play when the regulation starts to come in, states Wallace, formerly the chief financial officer for the sports media business IMG. Jesus Navas Seville £14,900,000 11 Jun, 2013Stevan Jovetic Fiorentina £22,000,000 19 Jul, 2013Alvaro Negredo Seville £20,000,000 19 Jul, 2013Jack Rodwell Everton £12,000,000 12 Aug, 2012Javi Garcia Benfica £15,800,000 31 Aug, 2012Fernandinho Shakhtar £30,000,000 06 Jun, 2013Gael Clichy Arsenal £7,000,000 04 Jul, 2011Sergio Aguero Atl Madrid £38,000,000 27 Jul, 2011Samir Nasri Arsenal £24,000,000 24 Aug, 2011Edin Dzeko Wolfsburg £27,000,000 07 Jan, 2011 ....200 million pounds + later.....have we someone willing to say what is required to satisfy the authorities or maybe he believed what he was saying at the time. Time will tell. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.