Guest Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 http://www.scribd.com/doc/217413725/The-Rangers-Football-Ltd-Accounts-2013 99% of wages to turnover 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H Wragg Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Personally I know of 4 fans of the new club that certainly won't be renewing if either of the current BOD or Ally is still there. They are pretty staunch new club fans and I know it's a small sample, but if they are anything to go by I think there could be big financial problems at Ibrox in a few months. My brother is a season ticket holder at Ibrox and is renewing. Haven't really discussed the ongoing situation on/off the park with him so I don't know his feelings. Also spoke to my mate on Tuesday and he wants the current BOD and McCoist both gone, but him and his old man are still buying their tickets for next year. I just can't see non renewal on a grand acale, much as it would be 'interesting'. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 All those laughing at you. That very much includes me. BTW - see that wanky way you include letters with symbols so you can get round the filters? Makes you come across as a bigger WKR than ever before. That very much is you. Poor wee berr. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 That very much is you. Poor wee berr. I sincerely hope you do think it's only me laughing at you. Poor whee plastic 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 My brother is a season ticket holder at Ibrox and is renewing. Haven't really discussed the ongoing situation on/off the park with him so I don't know his feelings. Also spoke to my mate on Tuesday and he wants the current BOD and McCoist both gone, but him and his old man are still buying their tickets for next year. I just can't see non renewal on a grand acale, much as it would be 'interesting'. This is my reading on the situation. We're used to the bluster and sabre-rattling by now, surely? Remember one regular poster on here saying he'd "walk away" if the Kraydales got their brogues under the boardroom table? Still bought his ST, still going home and away, still follow following. Can you really see Tedi giving up his comfy padded seat near the halfway line? In the unlikely event that he doesn't renew*, he still says he'll be going. Putting it simply, they have nothing else. Like the morons who see celtic strips as acceptable bridal wear, these lot have invested too much of themselves in their choice of arse-cheek. Most of us who follow football have a favourite team, but only these two attract the kind of blind subservience which we see in their acolytes. In a nutshell, without their "institution", they would be forced to maybe take a look at themselves. Has Bendarroch won 54 titles? Is AWRA the most successful loft-dweller in the world? Does bennett attract bigger attendances than all the other Scottish fannies put together? *Stand by for "I didn't realise the payment was automatic. I'd never have renewed otherwise, but seeing as the money's gone out, it's a fait accompli**, and I'd have been paying at the gate anyway, so it's not as if I've got no principles, blah blah blah..." ** Not that I can see Tedi the Leader of the Gang using that precise terminology.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adolfo Rios Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 (edited) http://www.scribd.com/doc/217413725/The-Rangers-Football-Ltd-Accounts-2013 Not sure if this has been posted yet but i'll stick it in anyway. Edited April 10, 2014 by Adolfo Rios 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Oh i've heard many rumours but until they become fact i won't post about it, hence the reason i've not posted the info you gave me, not my place. However as for you not challenging McGillivans blog and informing the forum that there is a massive disparity from the info you got and his then sorry that makes you a bit of a hypocrite, after all the info you provided to myself is showing such a gulf in salary that i would think it's something that should be challenged. Ive let people see the discrepancy... I've told you to post the figure i gave you. You have posted it... Are you caught in a time warp, or forgotten already? There you go Dave. Figure wasn't posted until after you told me. As you knew it was by PM, if you had said don't post it then i wouldn't have, too bad if you can't accept that. My point still stands that there was a massive discrepancy between both figures, no doubt if it was a Rangers fan that posted the bigger figure you would have challenged that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Bad news for Dave King on those figures, if only 22% of season ticket holders are willing to renew, thats what? 7000 season ticket holders? of those 7000 how many would give their money to King, how many straight to the Club? Doesn't give King much power at all... Suppose it saves him going through the embarrassment of failing a "fit n proper" test. Oh no, no, no.........................Campbell Ogilvie would ensure that Dave Glib wouldn't need to face that ignominy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Non Footballing Wages are £9.8 million. Staggering Christ, this '12 week review' really wasn't necessary. It's easy to see where the problems lie just looking at the accounts. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 There you go Dave. Figure wasn't posted until after you told me. As you knew it was by PM, if you had said don't post it then i wouldn't have, too bad if you can't accept that. My point still stands that there was a massive discrepancy between both figures, no doubt if it was a Rangers fan that posted the bigger figure you would have challenged that. Dave can't challenge anything you cretin, he's not the source. Why are you so insistent he say something that would amount to "that's not what I heard"? We know it's not what he heard so that would be less than pointless. I thought you were just drunk but it's a new day and you're still at it. What is it you want? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotbawmad Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 (edited) http://www.scribd.com/doc/217413725/The-Rangers-Football-Ltd-Accounts-2013 99% of wages to turnover So after 120 days of investigation he came to the conclusion that they were fucked? Edited April 10, 2014 by Fotbawmad 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Dave can't challenge anything you cretin, he's not the source. Why are you so insistent he say something that would amount to "that's not what I heard"? We know it's not what he heard so that would be less than pointless. I thought you were just drunk but it's a new day and you're still at it. What is it you want? That's not what youngsy on about - he was accused of breaking a confidence by revealing what was in a pm - but he has shown he got permission to make public the figure contained in the pm. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Dave can't challenge anything you cretin, he's not the source. Why are you so insistent he say something that would amount to "that's not what I heard"? We know it's not what he heard so that would be less than pointless. I thought you were just drunk but it's a new day and you're still at it. What is it you want? Why are you so bothered, you cretin. Dave gave the figure to myself, an entirely different figure was posted, no doubt to once again disparage Rangers and as far as i'm concerned there was a point to be made, too bad if that bothers you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 I sincerely hope you do think it's only me laughing at you. Poor whee plastic Remember that he lives in yorkshire and we're all jealous of him lol Probably his funniest post to date... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Sevco are even more fucked than we thought... That's f**k all, you should see what's happening at Rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muttonhumper Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 That's f**k all, you should see what's happening what happened at the now defunct Rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 He is having a conversation with Dave, why are you always in 'attack dog' mode? I want to know what it is he wants, he's been spamming us with his pish for a day now and it's still not clear what he wants dave to do. Maybe if he said what he wanted we could all get back to the serious business of laughing at rangers and sevco. PS I was asking youngsy a question why did you feel the need etc etc. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 Why are you so bothered, you cretin. Dave gave the figure to myself, an entirely different figure was posted, no doubt to once again disparage Rangers and as far as i'm concerned there was a point to be made, too bad if that bothers you. It doesn't bother me, but your filling up the pages with barely legible (if at all) rubbish detracts from the fun. I'm curious what you want. The things you are saying make no sense. Why can't you just tell us what you want? Is that so hard? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 http://www.scribd.com/doc/217413725/The-Rangers-Football-Ltd-Accounts-2013 99% of wages to turnover Non Footballing Wages are £9.8 million. Staggering £18M loss on a Turnover of £17M. Rangernomics at it's finest. Debt to parent company confirmed as £16M. It is unsecured and repayable on demand. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 I want to know what it is he wants, he's been spamming us with his pish for a day now and it's still not clear what he wants dave to do. Maybe if he said what he wanted we could all get back to the serious business of laughing at rangers and sevco. PS I was asking youngsy a question why did you feel the need etc etc. Unless you are totally stupid i would think it's very evident what i'm asking. However in case you don't understand here it is; One poster stated that McCulloch was on £15,000 going up to £17,500, he got his info from McGillivan. That figure was completely at odds to the figure given to Dave by his source. Now as this is a forum for debating football business and since the club in question was once again going to be ridiculed for this salary i put forward the view that as there was another figure given to myself by another poster, (Dave j), i thought that in the interest of debate and fairness that this figure was put forward for the sake of debate. After all isn't the finances at Rangers the main topic for debate on this thread. I hope that clarifies things for you, if it doesn't then too bad. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.