sjc Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Scottish football fans knew best. Are you seriously saying that post liquidation Rangers should have went straight into the (then) SPL? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Are you seriously saying that post liquidation Rangers should have went straight into the (then) SPL? Isn't he saying Scottish Fans got it right, the death of Rangers was the best thing for Scottish football 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Isn't he saying Scottish Fans got it right, the death of Rangers was the best thing for Scottish football I'm never quite sure with Bennett! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zidane's child Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Stuart mccoll is a big ranjurz man he'll help us oot. Get beat 3 skud off QOS Oh the lolzzzzz 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 How many EPL clubs were investigated and then settled out of court with HMRC, Chelsea and Arsenal to name but two. The difference being they could afford the settlement, the Premier League even acted as a mediator to protect two of its most valuable assets. Was that going to happen in Scotland ? Was it f*ck !! With a reported tax bill of £75m plus hanging over them which investor would touch Rangers with a barge pole, the knives were out and the hounds smelled blood !! F*ck Rangers they can go to the wall !! THEY DID -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pozbaird Posted April 9, 2015 Author Share Posted April 9, 2015 (edited) The worrying thing from my perspective is that from what I've seen, Queens and Falkirk are likely to scud St Mirren's arse next season if both of them remain in the Championship. Add in whoever remains there from Sevco/Hibs and the best I can see for us is fifth spot. Having said that. GIRFUY Sevco - well played Queens, right intae' that manky shite and no mistake. Edited April 9, 2015 by pozbaird 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 And cigarette lighters, or is that just at Porkheid ?? I AM FUCKING LOVING YOUR JOURNEY 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Koop Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 The last time this came up for discussion I suggested that Dave King would end up owning the club with fan's money and Mike Ashley and Chuckie's mates would tie up all the assets through securities. The club is nothing but a second hand SFA membership number now. Dave don't need no steenkin' badges anyway. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Did I fcuk. And if I remember correctly Rangers never had a say in it, due to not being a full member of the sfl. It also shows how little you understand as I said I'd like to see the money split with the opposing teams, nothing to do with wanting it all for Rangers. Up ye.... That rule only came into being after league reconstruction when the SFL & SPL merged into being the SPFL. So The Rangers knew exactly the score when it came to them being in the Championship this season. Only problem was that The Rangers were according to your fans were going to romp the league pumping everyone rotten on their final part of the journey beck to their rightful place n aw that. Hearts fucked that part of the journey and then it turns out The Rangers are piling up tens of millions of pounds of debt on their way up and now it matters because the club needs every penny it can steal from anyone. So your notion that The Rangers had no say in the matter is complete and utter pish and just shows you are still thick & stupid. Right up ye..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 That rule only came into being after league reconstruction when the SFL & SPL merged into being the SPFL. So The Rangers knew exactly the score when it came to them being in the Championship this season. Only problem was that The Rangers were according to your fans were going to romp the league pumping everyone rotten on their final part of the journey beck to their rightful place n aw that. Hearts fucked that part of the journey and then it turns out The Rangers are piling up tens of millions of pounds of debt on their way up and now it matters because the club needs every penny it can steal from anyone. So your notion that The Rangers had no say in the matter is complete and utter pish and just shows you are still thick & stupid. Right up ye..... That makes no sense at all, why are you always so angry? P.s looks like I was right earlier about your 'issues' I suggest you talk to someone about them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Dave King should apply for diplomatic immunity. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Tell us all about your Vicky the cross dressing Viking account .... :lol: Maybe Vicky is the sensible one and Bennett is the deviant , lots of evidence would support this theory 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 3.40 am in Goa (lol) and densboy is still posting about Rangers. Sleep, who needs sleep.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThirdrockfromtheSon Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Maybe Vicky is the sensible one and Bennett is the deviant , lots of evidence would support this theory Don't believe Bennett is a deviant.......a brilliant deflector and dodger of anything resembling a slightly difficult question or debate, and a thorn in the flesh at times with some incoherent ramblings over nothing. But a deviant? Naw, I don't think so. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Don't believe Bennett is a deviant.......a brilliant deflector and dodger of anything resembling a slightly difficult question or debate, and a thorn in the flesh at times with some incoherent ramblings over nothing. But a deviant? Naw, I don't think so. Brilliant eh..... Maybe you're not so bad after all... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThirdrockfromtheSon Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Brilliant eh..... Maybe you're not so bad after all... changed character nowadays. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 That makes no sense at all, why are you always so angry? P.s looks like I was right earlier about your 'issues' I suggest you talk to someone about them. Ah ! the Tedi deflector of suggesting that I'm angry whilst I composed my post in a calm composed manner of once again pointing out where you have made yourself look a bit thick & stupid. Suggesting I have issues is also weak pathetic attempt to weasel out of your self induced position of being pointed and laughed at because your posts at times do make you look thick & stupid. This would incur that you have educational issues that you should address, the lack of things you alarmingly do not know when you compose a message and also not well thought out in the first place thinking you are getting it "up ye..." to the P&D's often ends up making you look thick & stupid when they descend upon the post that made you look thick & stupid pointing out how thick & stupid you look. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Tell us all about your Vicky the cross dressing Viking account .... :lol: Aye that was a bit thick & stupid to get caught out on wasn't it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacGafraidh Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 Big Mike owns the badge and the shirts. How will that go if Lord Lyon deems the badge unusable due to the lion rampant and letters? Mike maybe onto nothing then! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted April 9, 2015 Share Posted April 9, 2015 How will that go if Lord Lyon deems the badge unusable due to the lion rampant and letters? Mike maybe onto nothing then! Might have something to do with The Rangers crest being a football crest and not an adopted heraldic crest that has been amended for a football jersey. I think it is because the Airdrieonians have utilised the towns heraldic crest and put in "AFC". I'm surprised Airdrieonians haven't decided to put their "AFC" under or above the crest to circumvent the laws on heraldic crests. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.