wunfellaff Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 We can have a debate or we can trade insults, but not at the same time, take yer pick I believe that the club has existed since 1872, I believe that a company runs and operates that club. Lord Glennie agrees, you can either agree with him or disagree I am not really bothered either way but this argument is old and quite frankly really boring. Anyway here is lord Glennie's statement again which pretty much covers my entire view on the matter. -"This is a petition for judicial review by The Rangers Football club plc, a company presently in administration, That COMPANY presently OPERATES Rangers Football CLUB (to whom i shall refer to as "rangers"). Rangers ARE members of the Scottish Football Association ("the SFA") If it is ''beliefs'' .... I ''believe'' your club was cheating. I ''believe'' your club was bigotted. I ''believe'' your club was populated by retarded shoites. I ''believe'' your club is dead 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 fixed, do you need help with the plc abbreviation? It was your quote..... , do you need help with the ''The'' suffix? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Then why miss the bit containing the word Company when referring to the club ? Wasn't needed, the word ''The'' was what caught you out 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Then why miss the bit containing the word Company when referring to the club ? Maybe because every sane person in the civilised world can see there's no fucking difference? Even your Glorious Leader is trying to stop innocent professionals from plying their trades with their new clubs because they declined to TUPE across to his new company. If Naismith, Shagger et al had stayed, would they be playing for the same club? If so, why would they have needed new contracts? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Then why miss the bit containing the word Company when referring to the club ? Incorporation to limited company and then to a PLC Rangers Football Club became a limited company on 27 May 1899[76] when it was incorporated as The Rangers Football Club Ltd. It continued in this form until, in 2000, David Murray decided to list the company on the stock exchange, making it a public limited company. The name of the company was therefore changed to The Rangers Football Club PLC.[13 Then why miss out the truth completely Tedi ? there's no point arguing when the facts are that the club became a company and not that the company is separate from the club when it was the club that became a company. And don't quote Lord Glennie again or you will end up looking as stupid as fcuk after the Lord Nimmo roasting you got 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Maybe because every sane person in the civilised world can see there's no fucking difference? Even your Glorious Leader is trying to stop innocent professionals from plying their trades with their new clubs because they declined to TUPE across to his new company. If Naismith, Shagger et al had stayed, would they be playing for the same club? If so, why would they have needed new contracts? ^^^ they were the last ''loyal'' servants, the rest took the cash and jumped to a new club,,,,,,,,,,, 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 ^^^ they were the last ''loyal'' servants, the rest took the cash and jumped to a new club,,,,,,,,,,, New company, surely? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Maybe because every sane person in the civilised world can see there's no fucking difference? Even your Glorious Leader is trying to stop innocent professionals from plying their trades with their new clubs because they declined to TUPE across to his new company. If Naismith, Shagger et al had stayed, would they be playing for the same club? If so, why would they have needed new contracts? They would have been employed by a different company. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 They would have been employed by a different company. And which company employs Naismith now? None of my Evertonian buddies (OK, neither) see their club as anything but that. A bit like you and the rest of the berrz before the shit hit the fan. Open question to any poster: I've only been on here 11 months. Many have been here longer. Can anybody find a post pre-2011 referring to rangers the club and rangers the company? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 And which company employs Naismith now? None of my Evertonian buddies (OK, neither) see their club as anything but that. A bit like you and the rest of the berrz before the shit hit the fan. Open question to any poster: I've only been on here 11 months. Many have been here longer. Can anybody find a post pre-2011 referring to rangers the club and rangers the company? Ah well, sometimes a difficult situation teaches you things. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beermonkey Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 If club & company are both separate and the company is just "operating" the club, then why does this "same club as always" now have a different name ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 If club & company are both separate and the company is just "operating" the club, then why does this "same club as always" now have a different name ? I don't see a different name on the fixture lists or on the SFL's website. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirty dingus Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Good laugh on the clyde phone in the night with DJ greeting and agreeing with the loony orcs. They are of to the conference, little do the know the conference they are invited to is one at a Premier Inn with a porn stars a trucker a big fat DLA recipient and a party clown, let's talk turkey. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beermonkey Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 I don't see a different name on the fixture lists or on the SFL's website. That because you lot only see what you want to see & dismiss anything else as "timmy propaganda" or some other shite. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 As you wish cunto -"This is a petition for judicial review by The Rangers Football club plc, a company presently in administration, That COMPANY presently OPERATES Rangers Football CLUB (to whom i shall refer to as "rangers"). Rangers ARE members of the Scottish Football Association ("the SFA") OK I'll bite So the source here you quote from ! who is the petitioner here ? Lord Glennie or Rangers PLC ? as with the Lord Nimmo roasting you got here we have the words of the administrators NUFF n HELPS themselves in the petition. At this point it's fair to say that the legal or judicial system haven't a clue about that the club itself is in fact the company,and that NUFF n HELPS have scripted the petition that Lord Glennie ruled upon.The ultimate goal of the petition was to get the transfer embargo deemed illegal as it wasn't in the list of punishments and was succeeded only to have it imposed when Green wanted a licence. Now at the top Tedi it clearly states that it is Lord Glennies OPINION and opinions are not the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth. And as with your believe or opinion that the club is separate from the company it means nothing and is the some of feck all. So I'll replace opinion or believe with the truth here and will quote to you again. Incorporation to limited company and then to a PLC Rangers Football Club became a limited company on 27 May 1899 when it was incorporated as The Rangers Football Club Ltd. It continued in this form until, in 2000, David Murray decided to list the company on the stock exchange,making it a public limited company. The name of the company was therefore changed to The Rangers Football Club PLC. So when you quote Lord Glennie who is only a judicial judge you are quoting an opinion and you are not stating facts of truth unlike the quote I have supplied above 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 I don't see a different name on the fixture lists or on the SFL's website. SO, same club, same strips, same home ground, same name, And Charlie's talking to BDO. Do you really have no concerns about this? I think you might be about to learn a bit more.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 I don't see a different name on the fixture lists or on the SFL's website. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 (edited) That because you lot only see what you want to see & dismiss anything else as "timmy propaganda" or some other shite. Take a look yourself: http://www.scottishf...m/club/rangers/ http://www.scottishfootballleague.com/football/third/fixtures/ Edited January 11, 2013 by Bearwithme 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Take a look yourself: http://www.scottishf...m/club/rangers/ Does Tedi know you're using his link? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 I don't see a different name on the fixture lists or on the SFL's website. ? maybe you forgot the start of the new season in the 3rd division when the orcs went on the rampage when the SFL had your team as "The Rangers FC" which was then changed to "Rangers FC" but the orcs still complained and then to "Rangers". So I've seen 3 changes to your teams name in August last year 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.