Ken Fitlike Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 How are you getting on in your quest to expose the oppression of the Protestant Sevco support by Scottish society? leggo continues to deny ever called chucky a 'snake oil salesman' 20 times in each blog for 3 months 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Tumblers in the establishments you drink in.I don't think the boy is old enough to gain entry to pubs. shared bucky in the swingpark probably 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 On a lot of their forums you see the Sevco fans bemoaning the missed opportunity of a new start re the football dept. They've wasted all this money on a squad that plays boring negative football against part time teams. They wanted an ethos put in place. A break from the Walter Smith blueprint. And they could have had it. That's the Rangers difficulty isn't it? Not many fans are really prepared to accept a period of low achievement in the name of re-building. We've seen this in the past with Dundee fans for instance, and in the current debate about a way forward for Scotland's national team. This natural impatience is exaggerated to the nth degree with Rangers though. Green dipped his toe in for long enough to recognise that they had to sign some 'big name' players and aim to bludgeon the opposition, in order to bring in the money. Recent events could really have afforded Rangers the breathing space to come back as something a bit different, both off the park and on it. That they didn't, is a shame, but it's perfectly understandable in the context of that club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Sensible Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Are you still copy and pasting things from Celtic forums, plastic? The Rangers way of doing things is being the best it's done is brilliantly for many, many years making us the most successful team in the Country. It's what seperates us from the diddies who settle for mediocre bullshit and the odd cup every 60+ years. The Rangers way... you said it... Perfect summary. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 This is not rebuilding, this is going backwards, these players that have struggled to win a game since new year were the same players who hammered Allloa 7-0 and comfortably beat Motherwell. We have a £6M wage bill and whole the losses shown in the interm report were below what I was expecting we still need to sell 35K+ ST`s next season to break even and while I have no doubt at all this will happen it goes without saying that a club of our size should look like a mismatch in our current situation, on the field we don`t. McCoist is not capable of rebuilding. I agree Ted. I was saying that there was scope for re-building here, but that's not what's taking place. It maybe sounds daft to say it when you're miles clear at the top, but in a way, you're currently getting the worst of both worlds. You've got an expensively assembled quick-fix squad without any real long-term vision. And yet the short-term picture isn't pretty either. The team are poor, they've had lots of embarrassing league slips and made no impact in the Cups. I'm not going to make ST sale predictions because I was surprised last time, but it will be very interesting to see how that goes this year, because the dynamic has changed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celtic Rebel. Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Are you still copy and pasting things from Celtic forums, plastic? The Rangers way of doing things is being the best it's done is brilliantly for many, many years making us the most successful team in the Country. It's what seperates us from the diddies who settle for mediocre bullshit and the odd cup every 60+ years. Aye As we fail again,like this cup. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Celtic Rebel, is that a cattle shed at the back of that photo? Quite apt. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celtic Rebel. Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 Celtic Rebel, is that a cattle shed at the back of that photo? Quite apt. Much better than the Asbestos Arena Benny boy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotbawmad Posted March 24, 2013 Share Posted March 24, 2013 (edited) I had a team named Rangers...It died!It died!Charlie said it was the company...He lied!He lied!Why oh why is my team dead?Couldn't that tax bill have hit me instead? Edited March 24, 2013 by Fotbawmad 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gav-ffc Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 So let's get this right, Green won't leave Rangers until champions league music is being played at Ibrox yet wants to go to the blue square premier leage? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 So let's get this right, Green won't leave Rangers until champions league music is being played at Ibrox yet wants to go to the blue square premier leage? He's a walking contradiction 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 So you accept that we still have all our trophies and history intact then? We accept that the sfa allowed your new club to inherit the old clubs history. Do u accept yous died and the club company argument is drivel ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 :lol: Is maith liom Eire. Have the three amigos taken a day off and left you in charge ya cabbage? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 Why should I? Because some wee Ayr fan that used to be a Falkirk fans tells me that he knows better than a law lord? I.understand what incorporation means. And I know what the insolvency laws are. Does some wee daft sfa guy know better than team of law lords that wrote said laws ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 So you think you know better than Lord Nimmo Smith then? He added in a soundbite about continuity, means f**k all. He did fine old rangers didn't he? We have provided evidence on numerous occasions that a club isn't seperate from its conpany but the only thing you can come up with to counter such evidence is a wee sounbite from a judge. Old rangers became a company in1899, u can't reverse that progress. Can't get into Europe because u don't have the accounts, if club was separate it would also have separate accounts. Players were allowed to leave, again if they were separate this wouldn't be allowed, like when Cameron bought Ayr from barr. No one was allowed to leave. Couple this with the fact that 3 prominent members of sevco have already admitted they are a new club then I think I put forward a pretty conclusive case. What evidence do u have to counter such claims? Apart from wee soundbites of course 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 It was not a soundbite, it was clearly written in the report with his name on it, judges do not deliver soundbites they deliver facts. I ask you again; Do you think you know better than Lord Nimmo Smith.? Hint I do not need an essay. I would leave it with this clown,Tedi. The fact that the club continuity has been recognised by footballing authorities,as well as it being recognised in the summation of two Law Lords,Nimmo-Smith and Glennie is enough. The rest don't matter,their opinion is irrelevant,the club continuity is recognised from 1872 going forward,so they will just have to live with the fact that the Annals of Scottish football will record it as such. And do you know what,there is absolutely fucking nothing they can do about it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 It was not a soundbite, it was clearly written in the report with his name on it, judges do not deliver soundbites they deliver facts. I ask you again; Do you think you know better than Lord Nimmo Smith.? Hint I do not need an essay. So no hard evidence then? Just one judges opinion. An opinion he then contradicts by imposing fine on old rangers. Aw well, argument over then. Obviously if u find some evidence I'll admit I'm wrong, until then argument is over. Have a nice day 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 (edited) Hard evidence? One Judges opinion (thought there were 3?) This has nothing to do with my original question, perhaps if you answer that then you may some of your own. Do you know better than Lord Nimmo Smith? Yes or No? If u.bother to.look back you will see that I did answer your original question. Yes the sfa allowed u to inherit history and keep continuity. They allowed u to do it, it wasn't a default action. So given that I answered your question can u answer my original question.Given u have been allowed to keep your history, would u admit your club died and the club company separation thing is drivel ? Remember Rangers fc, founded 1875, became a company in 1899. Liquidated 2012 Have a nice day Edited March 25, 2013 by AUFC90 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 There is youngsy, They can get right on your tits and get you to post the same stuff day after day. How many times have you posted the Annals of Scottish football. How many times has tedi posted do you think you know more than LNS. If you keep biting they will keep coming back. They may do that but there is absolutely nothing they can do to change the fact that the continuity has been recognised by the people that matter and do you know what; that's what's getting on their tits. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFC90 Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 They may do that but there is absolutely nothing they can do to change the fact that the continuity has been recognised by the people that matter and do you know what; that's what's getting on their tits. I wasn't arguing about that. And why would it get on.my tits? I don't need to argue for the next 50 years that my club didn't die. Am cool with it all tbh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.