Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

I am sure I have missed Murray apologising to Rangers supporters,shareholders,or the Scottish public at large. Do tell me if I wasn't paying attention when it happened.

He hasn't gone away. Not yet disappeared to his vineyard and estate in New Zealand.

However he did raise his head to complain about leaks from HMRC about the Rangers shenanigans.

He complained about the leaks that apparently took place. He didn't complain or attempt to correct the content of the said leaks.

Hypocrite. Up there with Keith O'Brien as a con man and liar. Using the law to bully lesser people into shutting up.

You'll need to show where in my post i stated anything about apologies from Murray. In fact it's just a pile of pish from you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a Rangers Man with all things Rangers at heart.

Not going there again due to hissy fits but he is a self serving rat fuccer. Own skin he saves.....numero imo he looks to. Coont of a "dignified" man.

Is that your rant about Smith over now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In what respect? If you mean as a manager who was given vast amount of funds to spend on his team why would we be critical of him at that particular time. After all tell me what manager would have rejected such sums for transfer targets,as well as that what support would be critical of a manager that was delivering trophy after trophy? The whole problem lay with Murray in subsidising such layout of money that was pushing the club further into debt. Add to that,there was no proof of any description that Smith benefitted from use of an EBT. So in what respect should Smith be criticised.

I agree with you about Walter Smith, I've never believed it's a managers job to look after the finances. he'll be given a budget to spend from the board / chairman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that your rant about Smith over now.

My opinion on him hasn't and won't change in the 30 years since he started the quotes...... biggest dignified coont in ibrox in my lifetime. He deserves the insanity wankstain gazza has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In what respect? If you mean as a manager who was given vast amount of funds to spend on his team why would we be critical of him at that particular time. After all tell me what manager would have rejected such sums for transfer targets,as well as that what support would be critical of a manager that was delivering trophy after trophy? The whole problem lay with Murray in subsidising such layout of money that was pushing the club further into debt. Add to that,there was no proof of any description that Smith benefitted from use of an EBT. So in what respect should Smith be criticised.

As such a dignified manager he should have said "NO TO THE EBT's" but he did not he relentlessly spent more and more via EBT during his managerial tenure knowing full well the HMRC were investigating Rangers from 2004,two years later Rangers paid more via EBT than at any other time in Rangers history and instead of stopping the scheme which would ultimately lead to Celtic & other clubs being more successful as a result of Rangers fielding a weaker squad than they did during the EBT years.

You could say Walter Mitty was complicit in the demise of Rangers PLC because he obviously knew Rangers were paying players via the EBT scheme and actively increased spending under it to get wan up ra sellick even though the club was being actively being investigated by the HMRC for abusing the EBT scheme by ripping the arse right out of it with non repayable loans.

Walter is a bad as they come when it applies to Rangers demise as he spent money knowing it could kill the club,but naw he takes the plaudits from the fans for winning trophies when a better plan of action might have been because he loves the club so much and told the fans out openly that David Murray could kill the club by using dodgy financial re-numerations and the HMRC were investigating the clubs dodgy finances.

Walter knew ! so guilty by association and complicit in the demise of Rangers and should not be seen as the hero the fans make him because he helped bankrupt the club in order to win trophies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'll need to show where in my post i stated anything about apologies from Murray. In fact it's just a pile of pish from you.

I didn't refer to your post as a source of Murray apologising or not. I am sure you are a nice guy. No offence, but I definitely would not use you as single source for anything.

What I meant was that I would have expected Murray to have apologised by now to all those he let down so badly. Saying one thing, doing something totally different.

As I don't follow every move I was wondering if I had missed it.

But then again, maybe some of the old Rangers fans do not think he has anything to apologise for. :o Please tell me that isn't the case.

Edited by thelegendthatis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As such a dignified manager he should have said "NO TO THE EBT's" but he did not he relentlessly spent more and more via EBT during his managerial tenure knowing full well the HMRC were investigating Rangers from 2004,two years later Rangers paid more via EBT than at any other time in Rangers history and instead of stopping the scheme which would ultimately lead to Celtic & other clubs being more successful as a result of Rangers fielding a weaker squad than they did during the EBT years.

You could say Walter Mitty was complicit in the demise of Rangers PLC because he obviously knew Rangers were paying players via the EBT scheme and actively increased spending under it to get wan up ra sellick even though the club was being actively being investigated by the HMRC for abusing the EBT scheme by ripping the arse right out of it with non repayable loans.

Walter is a bad as they come when it applies to Rangers demise as he spent money knowing it could kill the club,but naw he takes the plaudits from the fans for winning trophies when a better plan of action might have been because he loves the club so much and told the fans out openly that David Murray could kill the club by using dodgy financial re-numerations and the HMRC were investigating the clubs dodgy finances.

Walter knew ! so guilty by association and complicit in the demise of Rangers and should not be seen as the hero the fans make him because he helped bankrupt the club in order to win trophies.

Seriously what is going om inside your head? Your post has left me lost for words, i enjoy a good wind up and fishing post as much as the next guy but i doubt that even you can make sense of your inane ramblings.

Hellboy putting the pie into pie and bovril.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't refer to your post as a source of Murray apologising or not. I am sure you are a nice guy. No offence, but I definitely would not use you as single source for anything.

What I meant was that I would have expected Murray to have apologised by now to all those he let down so badly. Saying one thing, doing something totally different.

As I don't follow every move I was wondering if I had missed it.

But then again, maybe some of the old Rangers fans do not think he has anything to apologise for. :o Please tell me that isn't the case.

Oh Murray has plenty to apologise for and many Rangers fans are of the one opinion,that without a shadow of a doubt he should acknowledge his part in the creditors,shareholders and debenture bondholders losing money due to his financial misdealings. He has never apologised to anyone though or indeed he has never held his hand up to admit his part in all of this. I can assure you that the vast majority of Rangers fans have no respect or time for the man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As such a dignified manager he should have said "NO TO THE EBT's" but he did not he relentlessly spent more and more via EBT during his managerial tenure knowing full well the HMRC were investigating Rangers from 2004,two years later Rangers paid more via EBT than at any other time in Rangers history and instead of stopping the scheme which would ultimately lead to Celtic & other clubs being more successful as a result of Rangers fielding a weaker squad than they did during the EBT years.

You could say Walter Mitty was complicit in the demise of Rangers PLC because he obviously knew Rangers were paying players via the EBT scheme and actively increased spending under it to get wan up ra sellick even though the club was being actively being investigated by the HMRC for abusing the EBT scheme by ripping the arse right out of it with non repayable loans.

Walter is a bad as they come when it applies to Rangers demise as he spent money knowing it could kill the club,but naw he takes the plaudits from the fans for winning trophies when a better plan of action might have been because he loves the club so much and told the fans out openly that David Murray could kill the club by using dodgy financial re-numerations and the HMRC were investigating the clubs dodgy finances.

Walter knew ! so guilty by association and complicit in the demise of Rangers and should not be seen as the hero the fans make him because he helped bankrupt the club in order to win trophies.

Again i'll ask this question;as a football manager who was given vast amounts of money to invest in players do you honestly believe that he would not use all funds at his disposal to bring in new players to improve the team. There is unlikely to be a manager walking that would not use such funds.

As for HMRC investigating the EBTs, how did that work out and did Smith, to your knowledge, benefit personally from them? In which way could he, as the manager, stop the use of them? After all they weren't illegal and as the manager i would think it was beyond his remit to influence stopping any tax saving scheme that Murray initiated, wouldn't you?

As for winning trophies,i would think it was vital that Rangers won the SPL for Champions League qualification in order to bring that money into the club. Murray was complicit in the downturn of investment in players because of pressure from Lloyds/TSB and he has to shoulder a major part of the blame here but there was only one man responsible for the liquidation of the PLC,Craig Whyte. Withholding PAYE and N.I. was the catalyst for the liquidation by HMRC,nothing to do with Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again i'll ask this question;as a football manager who was given vast amounts of money to invest in players do you honestly believe that he would not use all funds at his disposal to bring in new players to improve the team. There is unlikely to be a manager walking that would not use such funds.

As for HMRC investigating the EBTs, how did that work out and did Smith, to your knowledge, benefit personally from them? In which way could he, as the manager, stop the use of them? After all they weren't illegal and as the manager i would think it was beyond his remit to influence stopping any tax saving scheme that Murray initiated, wouldn't you?

As for winning trophies,i would think it was vital that Rangers won the SPL for Champions League qualification in order to bring that money into the club. Murray was complicit in the downturn of investment in players because of pressure from Lloyds/TSB and he has to shoulder a major part of the blame here but there was only one man responsible for the liquidation of the PLC,Craig Whyte. Withholding PAYE and N.I. was the catalyst for the liquidation by HMRC,nothing to do with Smith.

I'll put it a little more plainly,,,, Walter says he has a deep love for the club,it doesn't matter one iota about the BTC outcome because at the time it was dead cert the HMRC were going to win it.

Walter is complicit in the downfall of Rangers PLC by actually signing players on EBT's when he clearly could have built a squad without using them in the good name of fairplay.

I don't agree with your philosophy of,if you can effectively cheat then do so by not playing by the rules which your club did break but got off on the technicality that they were not caught in the act when cheating and gave the old club a half million pound fine and let you keep your precious tainted titles.

Once again a Rangers fan does not think the club were found guilty of cheating in the LNS outcome because you got to keep your precious tainted titles and at the end of the day that's all that matters to Rangers fans having more titles than Celtic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm.

'Our Hero' ;

New Rangers owner Craig Whyte arrived to a thunderous applause as he entered Ibrox for the very first time as the new owner of Rangers Football Club.

Following on from late night negotiations that concluded the long-winded saga, Whyte took his seat alongside the board of directors for the club’s crucial SPL match against Hearts today.

The new owner arrived in an understated fashion, but the sight of him sent the hundreds of waiting fans at the main entrance of Ibrox into raptures.

Interestingly, Whyte took his seat sitting shoulder to shoulder with one of the men he called into question last night, Chief Executive Martin Bain.

Constant friction between Whyte and the board was to blame for the lengthy takeover process. The board’s ‘sub-committee’ are still expressing serious doubts as to whether Whyte has sufficient funds to cope with a possible tax bill that could land on the Ibrox club’s doorstep, following ongoing HMRC investigations.

'Lack of clarity' from Rangers owner over funding for potential tax bill

The potential ill-feeling between Whyte and the board could be somewhat eased by Rangers’ emphatic 4-0 win over Hearts, further extending their lead at the top of the SPL to four points.

Rangers stopped short of unveiling Whyte on the field, but the fans are under no illusions that things will change at their club.

After 36 trophies in 22 years under Sir David Murray, Rangers are now entering the age of Craig Whyte, who after snapping up over 85% of the club’s shares, has pledged £25m over five years to invest in the team. The new owner is also expected to make a statement on a potential restructuring of the Rangers board.

With the Ibrox club now in poll position to secure the SPL title, but the lingering threats of board unrest and HMRC tax implications looming, it seems that the club may yet face further changes over the coming months. The long term vision of Craig Whyte is yet unclear, but the businessman appears to already have the full backing of the fans.

Rangers will now eagerly watch Celtic’s trip to Rugby Park on Sunday, before contemplating their next crucial encounter with Dundee United at Ibrox on Tuesday.

You gotta love that guy :thumsup2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll put it a little more plainly,,,, Walter says he has a deep love for the club,it doesn't matter one iota about the BTC outcome because at the time it was dead cert HMRC were going to win it.

Walter is complicit in the downfall of Rangers PLC by actually signing players on EBT's when he clearly could have built a squad without using them in the good name of fairplay.

I don't agree with your philosophy of,if you can effectively cheat then do so by not playing by the rules which your club did break but got off on the technicality that they were not caught in the act when cheating and gave the old club a half million pound fine and let you keep your precious tainted titles.

Once again a Rangers fan does not think the club were found guilty of cheating in the LNS outcome because you got to keep your precious tainted titles and at the end of the day that's all that matters to Rangers fans having more titles than Celtic.

Such a dead cert that HMRC were going to win that they did indeed lose the FTT. As for the SPL Commission findings,again found guilty of non-disclosure,which did not give the club any sporting advantage on the field of play. That is two cases where the clubs position was upheld,just a shame that this is still eating away at you. Otherwise you wouldn't bother posting. Remind us again,was Walter Smith found to be a recipient of any EBT,even though at the time they were legal. Btw try and get your facts right,it was a £250,000 fine for non-disclosure, not £500,000. Wrong again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Such a dead cert that HMRC were going to win that they did indeed lose the FTT. As for the SPL Commission findings,again found guilty of non-disclosure,which did not give the club any sporting advantage on the field of play. That is two cases where the clubs position was upheld,just a shame that this is still eating away at you. Otherwise you wouldn't bother posting. Remind us again,was Walter Smith found to be a recipient of any EBT,even though at the time they were legal. Btw try and get your facts right,it was a £250,000 fine for non-disclosure, not £500,000. Wrong again.

Has anyone heard anything about how HMRC's appeal is going, or has it been dropped?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm.

 

'Our Hero' ; 

 

New Rangers owner Craig Whyte arrived to a thunderous applause as he entered Ibrox for the very first time as the new owner of Rangers Football Club.

 

Following on from late night negotiations that concluded the long-winded saga, Whyte took his seat alongside the board of directors for the club’s crucial SPL match against Hearts today.

The new owner arrived in an understated fashion, but the sight of him sent the hundreds of waiting fans at the main entrance of Ibrox into raptures.

Interestingly, Whyte took his seat sitting shoulder to shoulder with one of the men he called into question last night, Chief Executive Martin Bain.

Constant friction between Whyte and the board was to blame for the lengthy takeover process. The board’s ‘sub-committee’ are still expressing serious doubts as to whether Whyte has sufficient funds to cope with a possible tax bill that could land on the Ibrox club’s doorstep, following ongoing HMRC investigations.

'Lack of clarity' from Rangers owner over funding for potential tax bill

 

The potential ill-feeling between Whyte and the board could be somewhat eased by Rangers’ emphatic 4-0 win over Hearts, further extending their lead at the top of the SPL to four points.

Rangers stopped short of unveiling Whyte on the field, but the fans are under no illusions that things will change at their club.

After 36 trophies in 22 years under Sir David Murray, Rangers are now entering the age of Craig Whyte, who after snapping up over 85% of the club’s shares, has pledged £25m over five years to invest in the team. The new owner is also expected to make a statement on a potential restructuring of the Rangers board.

With the Ibrox club now in poll position to secure the SPL title, but the lingering threats of board unrest and HMRC tax implications looming, it seems that the club may yet face further changes over the coming months. The long term vision of Craig Whyte is yet unclear, but the businessman appears to already have the full backing of the fans.

Rangers will now eagerly watch Celtic’s trip to Rugby Park on Sunday, before contemplating their next crucial encounter with Dundee United at Ibrox on Tuesday.

You gotta love that guy :thumsup2

Why? He's the one who saved Rangers by dumping all their debt and buying them back by proxy. If it wasn't for Whyte the bank would have called in the debt run up by Murray and closed Ibrox 2 or 3 years ago.

Sent from the European departure lounge, hoping we don't bottle it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bendarroch, Bennett and youngsy...you guys deserve a medal for even bothering with the haters. As soon as the start quoting terrorist lovers and disgraced lawyers yoy know it is all over

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bendarroch, Bennett and youngsy...you guys deserve a medal for even bothering with the haters. As soon as the start quoting terrorist lovers and disgraced lawyers yoy know it is all over

What have andy goram and donald finlay got to do with this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone heard anything about how HMRC's appeal is going, or has it been dropped?

No doubt you're well aware that the appeal is ongonig, hence the reason why i stated Rangers won the FTT.

They didn't win it though did they? Only a proportion of the individual cases were found to have been legit.

Sent from the European departure lounge, hoping we don't bottle it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...