wunfellaff Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 £800,000 The salary of one Peter Liewell. The fact you think they are comparable shows you up for being a walloper. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 £800,000 The salary of one Peter Liewell. For a club with a turnover of over £100 milion who reached the last 16 of the champions league I think this is entirely appropriate. And considering he managed to orchestrate a plot to destroy Rangers, I think he's underselling himself. Comparing yourself to a richer, more successful club will not do you any favours, it just makes it easier for the spivs to pull the wool over your eyes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 £800,000 The salary of one Peter Liewell. Not even I expected you to be dense enough to come back with that response. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 (edited) What's truly contemptible is the extent of the duplicity the plastics and diddies are all-too-willing to indulge in to hide the rancid stench of their own hate on here. The continued attempts to argue the case where homophobia crops up is particularly telling. You're excusing it again - placing you somewhere beneath an idiot I'd say. No one could be surprised. And yet there is another diddy clubber willing to greeny your wretched post. Bendarroch, the original 'homophobia' thing was based on a post I made yesterday over here: http://www.pieandbovril.com/forum/index.php/topic/167655-big-rangers-administrationliquidation-thread-all-chat-here/page-4298#entry7547478 What I was trying to say was: Let's talk about sport rather than ourselves, seeing as cricket is great and The Cricket thread is one of the best extant P&B threads. Beermonkey said "Nah...That's for poofs." and then Apache Don agreed. OK so the comments weren't the best. What I SHOULD have done was sent them both a wee PM to say something like, "Revise your casual homophobia" and I am sure both would have agreed. With 20/20 I should have done that. What I don't want is their poor use of language to create a big drama and for we Rangers fans to make capital out of it. I think the best way out of this is for me to send a wee note to both posters and agree they can use better words in the future. Escalating this is wrong. Edited July 22, 2013 by The_Kincardine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 The fact you think they are comparable shows you up for being a walloper. tbf, he showed himself up as a walloper a fair while ago. We shall await the views of the more sensible peepil. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotbawmad Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 £800,000 The salary of one Peter Liewell. You do realise that Celtic is a club of 4 times your teams own revenue? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 Bendarroch, the original 'homophobia' thing was based on a post I made yesterday over here: http://www.pieandbovril.com/forum/index.php/topic/167655-big-rangers-administrationliquidation-thread-all-chat-here/page-4298#entry7547478 What I was trying to say was: Let's talk about sport rather than ourselves, seeing as cricket is great and The Cricket thread is one of the best extant P&B threads. Beermonkey said "Nah...That's for poofs." and then Apache Don agreed. OK so the comments weren't the best. What I SHOULD have done was sent them both a wee PM to say something like, "Revise your casual homophobia" and I am sure both would have agreed. With 20/20 I should have done that. What I don't want is their poor use of language to create a big drama and for we Rangers fans to make capital out of it. I think the best way out of this is for me to send a wee note to both posters and agree they can use better words in the future. Escalating this is wrong. Rather long winded way of saying cricket isn't for poofs. Still homophobic T.K. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Patriot~ Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 The fact you think they are comparable shows you up for being a walloper. That's brilliant from you waffle. You showed yourself up to be the biggest walloper in the general nonsense forum, even your own were against you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 You do realise that Celtic is a club of 4 times your teams own revenue? Leggo hasn't told him that yet, don't break it to the wee man. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beermonkey Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 (edited) I wouldn't worry too much - the plastic and diddies who have been very vocal of late in demanding that no bigotry from any side is acceptable on P&B will be along in a moment to decry Beermonkey and his homophobic hate. WKR & Partner In Crime will surely be the very first to do so - wont they? So...Saying cricket is for poofs is now regarded as homophobic hate is it? If you say so. Edited July 22, 2013 by beermonkey 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 You do realise that Celtic is a club of 4 times your teams own revenue? Strange going ons at Celtic, they've had a decent CL run yet appear to be putting a fair bit of effort into getting players sold. My opinion is that they think they can dominate the SPL with less resources and will bank the money and wait and see what condition we're in - in 2 years time. Still you'd think they'd try and build on last years euro run.... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 That's brilliant from you waffle. You showed yourself up to be the biggest walloper in the general nonsense forum, even your own were against you. So why bring a Celtic comparison into the debate ? We've never EVER played your club, you are two divisions below , company value halved in seven months, no bus, a Mckray on your board, season tickets from a farthing, early exit from the Ramsdens likely, stadium roof verrrrrry dodgy, admin looming, funds running out, and a pieman as manager. Why on earth make a comparison ? Oh, sorry. You've five stars. Nothing to see here. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 Strange going ons at Celtic, they've had a decent CL run yet appear to be putting a fair bit of effort into getting players sold. My opinion is that they think they can dominate the SPL with less resources and will bank the money and wait and see what condition we're in - in 2 years time. Still you'd think they'd try and build on last years euro run.... Whit ? Celtic are a selling club. Everyone , apart from a couple of ex soviet state clubs, some middle east ones, and PSG , are selling clubs. You think rangers international are in their bracket ? Ffs, man u sold ronaldo, and that paid for the interest on their debt for one fecking year. Though unlike rangers international , they could tap a fiver without going to payday loans. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 Whit ? Celtic are a selling club. Everyone , apart from a couple of ex soviet state clubs, some middle east ones, and PSG , are selling clubs. You think rangers international are in their bracket ? Ffs, man u sold ronaldo, and that paid for the interest on their debt for one fecking year. Though unlike rangers international , they could tap a fiver without going to payday loans. I would bother wunf, she's obviously obsessed and would rather talk about Celtic than address sevco's inherent problems and ridiculous salaries. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 (edited) Can you not read? I condemned him - no-one should be accused of enjoying cricket. That doesn't mean Rangers get a bye. Your continued attempt to justify your own fans bigotry with examples of other idiots bigotry is fucking pathetic to say the least. doubled for some reason. Edited July 22, 2013 by Bendarroch 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 Oh come on now when did Gollum or the BBC for that matter ever become a reliable and unbiased source? How on earth do you expect anyone to believe that. You're right. May I suggest some sort of protest? If you could gather some of the least attractive people in the country and get them to wave banners indicating that BBC stands for biased, bigoted and corrupt, I fail to see how you wouldn't be taken seriously. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 Rather long winded way of saying cricket isn't for poofs. Still homophobic T.K. That may be factually accurate but the question is how you respond to it? My take is that Beermonkey was injudicious in his use of language and should be allowed to say so rather than getting pelters. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 So...Saying cricket is for poofs is now regarded as homophobic hate is it? If you say so. Still defending the moronic post content I see - would you, for example, consider using a racial epithet instead of the homophobic one? Hate speak and the diddy clubbers - comfortable bedfellows on P&B. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 I would bother wunf, she's obviously obsessed and would rather talk about Celtic than address sevco's inherent problems and ridiculous salaries.More like getting fired up for malmo, elfsberg and rosenberg visiting scotch-land imminently.Any I see some poor bugger got instant ban on rm.... King Jela: A New Bus just wouldn't be the same for me. Big Swanley: Would it be a Zombus? Similar to me man down on the swamp. Tbh, threw it away, too many sniffs, so tedi will be able to get past the vinegar tonight. On the now closed bus thread, all I did was ask for my 99p back. Still, three soldiers live, and another three recruits awaiting the shilling . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted July 22, 2013 Share Posted July 22, 2013 What about cretin? Do you not get them in your soup? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.