Mybitchunderprotest Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 't imesthey are a changing'' on the swamp.. the latest purler Quote Today, 22:32 simplythechamps 1st Team Regular Join Date: 30-10-2009 Posts: 1,848 How would you describe the easdales in a non defamatory way Recent lawyers letters have quite correctly informed us that we can't call them the Kray's(as clearly they are not) or describe the bold Sandy as a crook (as his conviction is spent).So what non-defamatory words can we use for these gentlemen? I think ugly, retarded neds is ok as it's opinion but I'm no legal expert so I would welcome follow follow's opinion. Were I to be a visitor to the above site I may suggest "former crook" as a potentially legal description of the man and alternative title. For the collective duo, "businessmen with income of unknown origin" may also be correct. But I'm not so they can work it out for themselves. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Oops 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Oops ImageUploadedByPie & Bovril1394267507.987498.jpg They must have used the same printers as the green brigade use, it was meant to say sack and not back. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 They must have used the same printers as the green brigade use, it was meant to say sack and not back. I shouldn't worry, there'll probably be plenty of both. Nice to see a club's fans united for the common good. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phasma ex machina Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Were I to be a visitor to the above site I may suggest "former crook" as a potentially legal description of the man and alternative title. For the collective duo, "businessmen with income of unknown origin" may also be correct. But I'm not so they can work it out for themselves. It ran to a couple of pages afore being culled , very entertaining. As is the thread on Charlie saying he was worth double what they paid him :D and his sky interview http://www1.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/football/9201457/green-i-was-driven-out 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 ZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..... Greeny trying to deflect the flak away from the board...... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Horrible way to treat the guy that founded your clumpany 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Horrible way to treat the guy that founded your clumpany The Gallus Pioneer 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 PMG latest piece. Is it a piece and jam? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Is it a piece and jam? Just more opinion on King Dave being a self interested Spiv, and that he's after the last meat on the bone. Nothing that would interest you. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-MAN Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 PMG should give it a rest and when the inevitable happens come back and say "told you so" All just seems to be typing a blog for the sake of it. Nothing new nor interesting to be honest. You find out more from the RIFC share price page on the LSE (london south east. Called such cos they cant use the official name) page. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloomogganners Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 PMG should give it a rest and when the inevitable happens come back and say "told you so" All just seems to be typing a blog for the sake of it. Nothing new nor interesting to be honest. You find out more from the RIFC share price page on the LSE (london south east. Called such cos they cant use the official name) page. He's a mud slinger keep throwing and get remembered for what hits. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 From him I would prefer peace and quiet Philip or Densboy? He's a mud slinger keep throwing and get remembered for what hits. He's cried wolf too many times to be taken seriously now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phasma ex machina Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Oh , Dear....the Suck has taken his phone to the Sun, and the results are not going down too well 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ribzanelli Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Was it not a 6 month loan? Sun says payable by 2015 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Not being funny, but I'd just assumed the loan was bound to be repaid via season ticket income. Where else would it have come from? Don't season tickets comprise Rangers only real source of serious cash anyway? The loan was surely just a bridging type arrangement anyway, to enable them to continue until ST time, was it not? I genuinely don't understand why this 'news' amounts to a revelation. Can anyone explain it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Not being funny, but I'd just assumed the loan was bound to be repaid via season ticket income. Where else would it have come from? Don't season tickets comprise Rangers only real source of serious cash anyway? The loan was surely just a bridging type arrangement anyway, to enable them to continue until ST time, was it not? I genuinely don't understand why this 'news' amounts to a revelation. Can anyone explain it? This was my understanding as well. Of course, the Loyal berrz' money ain't gonna build them a world-beating squad any time soon, if ever: hence the unseemly whoring themselves out for a "real rangers man" - i.e. somebody with a shitload of cash he doesn't mind losing for good. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 You saying we won't be seeing the casino/hover pitch any time soon? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highlandmagyar Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Not being funny, but I'd just assumed the loan was bound to be repaid via season ticket income. Where else would it have come from? Don't season tickets comprise Rangers only real source of serious cash anyway? The loan was surely just a bridging type arrangement anyway, to enable them to continue until ST time, was it not? I genuinely don't understand why this 'news' amounts to a revelation. Can anyone explain it? I would think that it isn't any surprise to non bears, but the bears will be spitting out their sugar puffs over breakfast on this as they obviously think differently. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bookies Love Me Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Was it not a 6 month loan? Sun says payable by 2015 From the credit facilities document: "The Easdale Facility and the Laxey Facility (together the "Facilities") are both secured against the Company's Edmiston House and Albion car park properties. The principal amounts of the Facilities are repayable no later than 1 September 2014 from a variety of potential sources. " 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.