bennett Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Whit a crock ... Craig is simply urging the fans to email them and abuse them ... knowing full well that copies of his 'original email pic' are now floating around the internet landing on sites like this ... If it was fake would the media be running with it? Remember they ignored everything that CF put out but CF was appaently a blakmailing scumbag afterall.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 I'm sure Densboy will apologise... The Scottish FA Board convened on Tuesday, 23rd December to hear a submission from the Board of Rangers Football Club. This meeting was arranged in respect of a request set out in an Application to Consent to an increase in MASH Holdings Limited's shareholding in Rangers International Football Club to a maximum of 29.9% of the issued share capital. The Board has now carefully considered the Application and has decided, unanimously, that the Application should not be granted. The Board, under Article 13 of the Scottish FA Articles of Association, is required to have due regard to the need to promote and safeguard the interests and public profile of association football, its players, spectators and others involved with the game. This test is set out in full in Article 13.6. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 I thought Phil said this was a done deal? Another scoop down the drain for Philip, he can't seem to get anything right. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 The f**k is Densboy rambling about now? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 NOW f**k OFF ASHLEY. To be replaced by who? And what? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muttonhumper Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 To be replaced by who? And what? Administration? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 To be replaced by who? And what? A.R. Mageddon. Social unrest. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Well they still have a £16M offer on the table. Not siding with anyone in this, but all you have is the word of a guy who has shown himself to be nothing like trustworthy. The £16m might not actually be on the table. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Administration? a few different options Loans from Ashley set against property Ashley appeals and wins Ashley gets a stooge to buy shares The board accept an offer from King or Kennedy Administration 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dublinarab Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 If they won't accept Ashley's clean money why would they accept Kings? I actually don't see any problem with Ashley owning rangers and Newcastle. Think the SFA will be challenged on this and lose. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 (edited) Personally, I think if he wants to, Ashley will still buy whatever shareholding he feels he has to in Rangers and will deal with the legal challenge from the SFA if and when it comes round. Still very surprised that they have knocked it back initially. Edited December 24, 2014 by Ross. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 If they won't accept Ashley's clean money why would they accept Kings? I actually don't see any problem with Ashley owning rangers and Newcastle. Think the SFA will be challenged on this and lose. Challenged in the courts? and what grounds would Ashley have? The only fly in the ointment i can see is maybe a conflict of interest with a couple of SFA board members. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 According to King all the guarantees they need will be given and the names involved will be released once the shareholders accept. According to King Easdale accepted this. According to King Somers is 'disingenuous' Not sure what other choice the shareholders now have, they have nothing to lose accepting it especially given the alternative seems to be administration which is surely not in the best interests of shareholders or the company. Any of those statements potentially a bit glib or shameless? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MEADOWXI Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Challenged in the courts? and what grounds would Ashley have? The only fly in the ointment i can see is maybe a conflict of interest with a couple of SFA board members. The membership rules of a private club (The SPFL), are they what they want I thought.......was that not the issue with golf clubs? MA may struggle to make a case. Totally separately whatever happened to Leggo........ His insane blogs used to make me laugh 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 According to King all the guarantees they need will be given and the names involved will be released once the shareholders accept. According to King Easdale accepted this. According to King Somers is 'disingenuous' Not sure what other choice the shareholders now have, they have nothing to lose accepting it especially given the alternative seems to be administration which is surely not in the best interests of shareholders or the company. Any of those statements potentially a bit glib or shameless? According to the South African legal system, Dave King should not be trusted under any circumstances. Granted, the South African legal system is not the greatest standard for honest appraisals but the comments made about king(A few of them quoted above) would make me seriously question anything he states. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Any of those statements potentially a bit glib or shameless? Don't know about glib and shameless but they are a stick on to be lies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dublinarab Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 Rules which probably wouldn't stand up in court regarding property, shareholdings etc. I am surprised at the SFA's strong stance. I half expected a hearts loss, rangers victory over hibs and Ashley given the green light to stabilise rangers leading to a re-emergence of WATP type nonsense. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 But But But But The SFA bend and break their own rules to help Rangers. They would never ever ever try and impose illegal sanctions on the club........Oh Wait. -6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 According to King all the guarantees they need will be given and the names involved will be released once the shareholders accept. According to King Easdale accepted this. According to King Somers is 'disingenuous' Not sure what other choice the shareholders now have, they have nothing to lose accepting it especially given the alternative seems to be administration which is surely not in the best interests of shareholders or the company. 'According to King' immediately sets the warning buzzers off. Who on earth would agree to any deal with guarantees to be supplied after agreement? 'madder than mad wee Jock McMad from Aberdeen' as Blackadder would say 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aDONisSheep Posted December 24, 2014 Share Posted December 24, 2014 'According to King' immediately sets the warning buzzers off. Who on earth would agree to any deal with guarantees to be supplied after agreement? 'madder than mad wee Jock McMad from Aberdeen' as Blackadder would say What could possibly go wrong, said Charles Green to Craig Whyte and Dave King. In the drawing room with candelabra. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.